ASSESSMENT OF FUNCTIONAL AND SURGICAL OUTCOMES IN COMBINED APPROACH MASTOIDECTOMY FOR CHRONIC OTITIS MEDIA SQUAMOSAL TYPE.

Main Article Content

Dr. Vikas Patel
Dr. Surendra Singh Moupachi
Dr. Pallavi Indurkar
Dr. Neeraj Dubey
Dr. Ankita Kujur

Keywords

.

Abstract

Patients who need ossicular chain reconstruction, have recurring infections, or have large or complex cholesteatomas benefit most from Combined Approach Mastoidectomy. More accurate removal of diseased tissue, better preservation of the ear's architecture, and better results in terms of hearing restoration and recurrence prevention are all made possible by the dual access. The process is customized to the patient's pathology, with technique modifications made in response to the severity of the illness and the ear's anatomical characteristics.


Compared to conventional methods, this strategy has shown a notable decrease in cholesteatoma recurrence rates and enhanced hearing results. To reduce problems like facial nerve damage or lingering disease, it necessitates meticulous patient selection, thorough preoperative imaging, and proficiency with both techniques.


The combination strategy continues to develop with advancements in surgical technology, such as the use of endoscopy and intraoperative imaging, and provides a promising remedy for difficult ear diseases.

Abstract 111 | pdf Downloads 80

References

1. Jaya Chrisanthus, Shibu George:Mastoidectomy: retrospective analysis of 137 cases in a tertiary care hospital International Journal of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery Chrisanthus J et al. Int J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Jan;4(1):93-99
2. Anant chouhan et. al:Modified intact canal wall mastoidectomy technique in chronic suppurative otitis media: A prospective study of 50 cases. Indian Journal of Basic and Applied Medical Research; September 2014: Vol.-3, Issue- 4, P. 332-340
3. Yusof, A.N.M., Boon, W.J., Ali, A. et al. Outcomes of canal wall down mastoidectomy in cholesteatoma: a 5-year experience. Egypt J Otolaryngol 39, 50 (2023).
4. Mousumi Modhumita Agarwala et al., Complications of Mastoid SurgeryJournal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2024 Jun, Vol-18(6): MC01-MC04
5. Harris AT, Mettias B, Lesser THJ. Pooled analysis of the evidence for open cavity, combined approach and reconstruction of the mastoid cavity in primary cholesteatoma surgery. The Journal of Laryngology & Otology. 2016;130(3):235-241
6. Tshifularo, M. Tympanoplasty success based on surgeon and patient-reported outcomes perspectives: a 10-year review in a tertiary center. Egypt J Otolaryngol 38, 15 (2022)
7. Al Hamoud M, Alzubaidi A, Al Shahrani K, et al. (February 28, 2024) Degree of Hearing Improvement and Reduction of Air-Bone Gap After Tympanoplasty in a Tertiary Hospital in Saudi Arabia. Cureus 16(2): e55159.
8. Kaya E, Kaya F, Kaya Mİ, Çaklı H, İncesulu ŞA. A study on the efficacy of combined surgery in advanced-stage congenital cholesteatoma with canal-wall-up surgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Nov;281(11):5747-5752.
9. Roth TN, Ziglinas P, Haeusler R, Caversaccio MD (2013) Cholesteatoma surgery in children: long-term results of the inside-out technique. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 77(5):843–846.
10. Bo Li, Lingyun Zhou, Miaowei Wang, Yanwen Wang, Jian Zou, Endoscopic versus microscopic surgery for treatment of middle ear cholesteatoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis, American Journal of Otolaryngology, Volume 42, Issue 2, 2021, 102451, ISSN 0196-0709,
11. Sajjadi H. Endoscopic middle ear and mastoid surgery for cholesteatoma. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Spring;25(71):63-70. PMID: 24303422; PMCID: PMC3846264.
12. Rong BG, Chen WL, Ding YP, Ding SL, Xu AT, Chen Y, Wang TD. [Clinical study of combined approach of tympanoplasty and mastoidectomy with close technique]. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2005 Jun;40(6):449-51. Chinese. PMID: 16144344.