A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE EFFECTS OF SPINAL VERSUS GENERAL ANAESTHESIA ON APGAR SCORE OF THE NEONATES AMONG PATIENTS ENDURING ELECTIVE CAESAREAN SECTION
Main Article Content
Keywords
Spinal anaesthesia, general anaesthesia, Apgar score, elective caesarean section, maternal health, neonatal outcomes,, Pakistan
Abstract
Objectives : The purpose of this research is to establish the use of spinal versus general anesthesia for elective caesarean section and how it affects the Apgar score among neonates together with the maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Materials and Methods : A cross-sectional study was planned among 200 women who were planned for elective cesarean sections at multiple centers incuding Department of Anesthesiology, Isra University Hospital Hyderabad, Pakistan and Department of Anaesthesiology and Surgical ICU Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences Hospital Jamshoro Hyderabad, Pakistan. Participants were divided into two groups based on the type of anesthesia administered: Local anesthesia that involves the use of spinal anesthesia and general anesthesia. Maternal characteristics, initial apgar scores, and neonates that required resuscitation were recorded and compared.
Results : These studies revealed neonates who were delivered under spinal anaesthesia had better mean Apgar scores at 1 minute as compared to those delivered under general anaesthesia. Nevertheless, spinal anaesthesia was found to increase the rate of maternal hypotension and vasopressor use. Neonatal resuscitation rate was however higher in general anaesthesia but maternal haemodynamics were more stable during the procedure.
Conclusion :Regarding the neonatal Apgar scores, spinal anesthesia has little advantage compared with epidural anesthesia but has more impact on maternal cardiovascular stability. Each of these two sorts of anesthesia has relative merits and demerits; they cannot be delivered in an impersonal manner.
References
2. Ahmad, M., Khan, S.U., Zafar, H., Mian, M.H.U.B., Nazir, F.N., Khan, M.T. and Chaudhary, W.A., 2024. FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH APGAR SCORE AMONG NEWBORNS DELIVERED BY CESAREAN SECTIONS; A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY. Rehman Journal of Health Sciences, 6(1), pp.103-110.
3. Hasan, S.R., Ibrahim, A. and Al-Fahdawi, T.R., 2023. Comparison between ephedrine and noradrenaline in Prevention hypotension after spinal anesthesia in cesarean section: A prospective randomized comparative clinical study. Journal of Carcinogenesis, 22(2).
4. Uluç, K., Cinar, A.S., Türk, H.Ş. and Gökdemir, E.F., 2024. COMPARİSON OF THE EFFECTS OF ANESTHESİA TECHNİQUE AND MATERNAL WARMİNG ON NEONATAL BODY TEMPERATURE İN CESAREAN SECTİON OPERATİONS: A RETROSPECTİVE STUDY. Acta Medica Nicomedia, 7(2), pp.189-195.
5. Fatima, S., Haider, S.Z., Taqi, M., Khalid, K., Aftab, M.M. and Khan, S.H., 2022. Fetomaternal Outcome Under Subarachnoid Block for Elective Caesarean Section. Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences, 16(11), pp.204-204.
6. Rajabi, M., Razavizade, M.R., Hamidi-Shad, M., Tabasi, Z., Akbari, H. and Hajian, A., 2020. Magnesium sulfate and clonidine; effects on hemodynamic factors and depth of general anesthesia in cesarean section. Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, 10(5).
7. Wang, M., Liao, C., Li, X., Chen, W., Li, Y., Zhang, W. and Wang, S., 2024. Effect of ropivacaine, mepivacaine or the combination of ropivacaine and mepivacaine for epidural anaesthesia on the postoperative recovery in patients undergoing caesarean section: a randomized, prospective, double-blind study. BMC anesthesiology, 24(1), p.54.
8. Datta, S., Chattopadhyay, S., Mandi, A.K. and Bhar, D., 2024. A Double-Blinded Prospective Randomized Control Study of Preoperative Administration of Intravenous Mephentermine Vs Intramuscular Mephentermine in Preventing Post-Spinal Hypotension in Caesarean Section. Journal of Obstetric Anaesthesia and Critical Care, 14(1), pp.37-44.
9. Zanfini, B.A., Di Muro, M., Biancone, M., Catarci, S., Piersanti, A., Frassanito, L., Ciancia, M., Toni, F., Santantonio, M.T. and Draisci, G., 2023. Ultrasound-Guided Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block vs. Ultrasound-Guided Bilateral Posterior Quadratus Lumborum Block for Postoperative Analgesia after Caesarean Section: An Observational Closed Mixed Cohort Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12(24), p.7720.
10. Novakovic, S.S., Uletilovic, S., Mandic-Kovacevic, N., Cvjetkovic, T., Stojiljkovic, M.P., Skrbic, R. and Loncar-Stojiljkovic, D., 2024. Comparative Effects of Target-Controlled Infusion of Propofol Versus Spinal and Thiopental-Sevoflurane Anesthesia on Lipid Peroxidation in Elective Cesarean Section: A Prospective, Open-Label Study. Cureus, 16(6).
11. Kanashiro, G.P., Lima, C.M., Nicácio, I.P., Nicácio, G.M., Brinholi, R.B. and Cassu, R.N., 2024. Maternal and neonatal effects of epidural levobupivacaine combined with fentanyl or sufentanil for elective cesarean-section in brachycephalic breeds. Topics in Companion Animal Medicine, 60, p.100873.
12. Liu, S., Luo, S., Jiang, R., Su, S. and Zhao, M., 2024. Left-lateral position versus phenylephrine prophylactic treatment for hypotension following combined spinal epidural anesthesia during elective cesarean section. Heliyon, 10(9).
13. Aydin Güzey, N. and Uyar Türkyilmaz, E., 2022. Evaluation of 254 cesarean sections with COVID-19 in terms of anesthesia and clinical course: 1-year experience. Journal of Anesthesia, 36(4), pp.514-523.
14. Thada, B., Sethi, S.K., Meena, Y.K., Rathore, M. and Yadav, R.L., 2024. A Randomized Comparative Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine used as an Adjuvant to Isobaric 1% 2-Chloroprocaine in Parturients Undergoing Elective Lower Segment Cesarean Section under Subarachnoid Block. Journal of Obstetric Anaesthesia and Critical Care, 14(1), pp.60-66.
15. MeenaKumari, R. and Sathyanarayana, V., 2021. A study of phenylephrine administration for the prevention and treatment of hypotension in cesarean section during spinal anaesthesia. Journal of Cellular & Molecular Anesthesia, 6(3).