IMPLANON FAILURE LEADING TO THE RUPTURED ECTOPIC PREGNANCY: AN UNUSUAL OCCURANCE

Main Article Content

Dr. Saima Najam
Dr. Azza Algharbawy
Dr. Nida Rizwan Haider
Syeda Ifra Hassan

Keywords

Ectopic, implanon, pregnancy, bhcg, Failure, etonogestrel

Abstract

Implanon is a contraceptive implant pre-loaded in a disposable applicator for the women of reproductive age. It is a single small soft, flexible plastic rod of 4.0 cm length and 2.0mm in diameter, which is placed subcutaneously under the skin of the non-dominant arm 3-4 cm below the vascular groove between the biceps and the triceps muscles and 8-10 cm above the medial epicondyle of the humerus bone. It is effective for 3.0 years and has etonogestrel 68 mg, out of which a small amount of the etonogestrel in continuously released in the blood stream. It is made up of ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer, a plastic that will not dissolve in the body. It also contains a small amount of barium sulfate which renders it visible under X-Ray. We do not have many studies available about the pregnancy with the Implanon. How ever the failure rate of the implanon was claimed as 1 in 1000 insertions. We report a case where the implanon was inserted for 17 months and the patient presented with the continuous bleeding and the abdominal pain, and the pregnancy was diagnosed by doing the serial BHCG levels and was found to be ectopic.  She was admitted for the medical management, however, during admission, it was ruptured which was diagnosed and immediately shifted for the laparotomy. Her left salpingectomy was done, and the patient remained stable thereafter.

Abstract 128 | PDF Downloads 105

References

1. Moray, K.V.; Chaurasia, H.; Sachin, O.; Joshi, B. A systematic review on clinical effectiveness, side-effect profile and meta-analysis on continuation rate of etonogestrel contraceptive implant. Reprod. Health 2021, 18, 4.
2. Thaxton, L.; Lavelanet, A. Systematic review of efficacy with extending contraceptive implant duration. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2019, 44, 2–8.
3. Harrison-Woolrych M, Hill R. Unintended pregnancies with the etonogestrel implant (Implanon): a case series from postmarketing experience in Australia. Contraception. 2005 Apr;71(4):306-8.
4. Graesslin O, Korver T. The contraceptive efficacy of Implanon: a review of clinical trials and marketing experience. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2008 Jun;13 Suppl 1:4-12.
5. Lazorwitz A, Aquilante CL, Sheeder J, et al. Relationship between patient characteristics and serum etonogestrel concentrations in contraceptive implant users. Contraception 2019;100:37–41.
6. Callahan R, Yacobson I, Halpern V, et al. Ectopic pregnancy with use of progestin-only injectables and contraceptive implants: a systematic review. Contraception 2015;92:514–22.
7. Bennink HJ. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of Implanon, a single rod etonogestrel contraceptive implant. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2000 Sep;5(2):12-20.
8. Henderson PMN, Gillespie MD. Ectopic pregnancy with Implanon. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2007;33:125–6.
9. Reed, S., Minh, T. D., Lange, J. A., Koro, C., & Heinemann, K. (2023). Pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes in a prospective cohort study: Final results from the Nexplanon Observational Risk Assessment Study (NORA). Contraception, 120, 109920.
10. Rocca M. L., Palumbo, A. R., Visconti, F., & Di Carlo, C. Safety and Benefits of Contraceptives Implants: A Systematic Review. Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2021;14(6): 548.
11. Hedley AA, Ogden CL, Johnson CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, Flegal KM. Prevalence of overweight and obesity among US children, adolescents, and adults, 1999–2002. JAMA. 2004;291:2847–50.
12. Society of Family Planning. Clinical Guidelines: Contraceptive considerations in obese women. Contraception. 2009;80:583–90.
13. Xu, H., Wade, J. A., Peipert, J. F., Zhao, Q., Madden, T., & Secura, G. M. (2012). Contraceptive failure rates of etonogestrel subdermal implants in overweight and obese women. Obstetrics and gynecology, 120(1), 21–26.
14. Edwards, J. E., & Moore, A. (1999). Implanon. A review of clinical studies. The British journal of family planning, 24(4 Suppl), 3–16
15. Bouquier J, Fulda V, Bats A-S, et al. A life-threatening ectopic pregnancy with etonogestrel implant. Contraception 2012;85:215–7.
16. Olowu O, Karunaratne J, Odejinmi F. Ectopic pregnancy with Implanon® as a method of contraception in a woman with a previous ectopic pregnancy - case report. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2011;16:229–31.
17. Henderson PMN, Gillespie MD. Ectopic pregnancy with Implanon. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2007;33:125–6.
18. Patni S, Ebden P, Kevelighan E, et al. Ectopic pregnancy with Implanon. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2006;32:115
19. Oluseun SO, Omolola BR, Olowokure O.A,Tunde OA. Ruptured ectopic pregnancy in a woman with implanon failure: a case report.GSJ.2023.volume 11, issue 12.
20. Rodrigues ML, Branco R, Landim E.Ectopic pregnancy with etonogestrel implant.BMJ Case Reports CP 2021;14:e245175
21. Mansour M, Louis-Sylvestre C, Paniel B-J. Grossesse extra-utérine survenue sous contraception par implant d’étonogestrel (Implanon®) : premier cas. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 2005;34:608–9.
22. Lynn, M.M.; Holdcroft, C. New concepts in contraception: Norplant subdermal implant. Nurse Pract. 1992, 17, 85–89.
23. Cooper, M. Norplant. Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1991, 31, 265–272.

Most read articles by the same author(s)