DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF SELF REPORT MEASURE OF GRATITUDE SCALE FOR PAKISTANI YOUTH

Main Article Content

Zara Haroon
Amna Khawar
Amina Muazzam

Keywords

gratitude, flourishment, youth, self-report measure

Abstract

In today's fiercely competitive society, the expression for genuine gratitude is diminishing. The focus is on what we need rather than on what we have. Despite, gratitude being a crucial aspect of humanity, has received recognition recently. Gratitude is not merely a passing emotion rather it is a practice that can transform lives and can improve overall well-being. Gratitude plays a crucial role in the growth and development of young people as their transition from being dependent on their families in childhood to becoming independent adults who actively participate in society. Gratitude is less practiced by youth making them susceptible to many mental health problems.[1] It has been acknowledged through literature that gratitude has multiple dimensions that are not measured through a single construct in Pakistan. The purpose of the study was to develop a culturally promising, well-founded, valid, reliable and indigenous measure of Gratitude for Pakistani Youth.  In the first phase, the item pool of 33 items was generated by extensive literature review, semi structured interviews and focus groups. Content Validity index (CVI) Lynn`s [2] was established on six experts rating. The total CVI calculated was 0.84 and 27 items were retained. Pilot study was conducted on n=40 participants on pre liminary scale to check its face validity. In the next phase Exploratory Factor Analysis (N=370) emerged three factors such as Gratitude towards God, Social Gratitude and Expression of Gratitude with significant internal consistency ɑ=.92, ɑ=.91 and ɑ=.89. To confirm the emerged factors Confirmatory Factor Analysis (N=534) was run on youth sample with age range 15-24 years (M=19.76, SD=2.35) which revealed the consistent factor structure as EFA. Psychometric Properties of the SRMG were also established. Convergent validity (N=534) was established by using Positive Emotions Scale (r=.65, p<.01) whereas Discriminant validity(N=534) was established through DASS-21 (r=-.10, p<.05). [3, 4] The Test–retest reliability(N=45) of the Gratitude Scale was established by re administering the test after two weeks of interval (r=.80, p<.001). Finally, the 27 items Self Report Measure of Gratitude scale measuring three factors was developed. The value added by this study encourages educationists, School and college counselors, and clinicians to design better development programs to inculcate gratitude in youth.

Abstract 473 | PDF Downloads 167

References

1. Chopik WJ, Newton NJ, Ryan LH, Kashdan TB, Jarden AJ. Gratitude across the life span: Age differences and links to subjective well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology. 2017 Dec 15;14(3):292–302.
2. Lynn MR. Determination and Quantification of Content Validity. Nursing Research. 1986 Nov;35(6):382–6.
3. Shamim A, Muazzam A. Positive Emotions Scale: Construct Development and Validation. Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research. 2020 Sep 11;35(3):429–54.
4. Lovibond PF, Lovibond SH. The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS) with the beck depression and anxiety inventories. Behavior Research and Therapy [Internet]. 1995;33(3):335–43. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7726811/
5. Liu L, Jones BF, Uzzi B, Wang D. Data, measurement and empirical methods in the science of science. Nature Human Behavior [Internet]. 2023 Jun 1;1–13. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-023-01562-4
6. Froh JJ, Fan J, Emmons RA, Bono G, Huebner ES, Watkins P. Measuring gratitude in youth: Assessing the psychometric properties of adult gratitude scales in children and adolescents. Psychological Assessment. 2011;23(2):311–24.
7. Senf K, Liau AK. The Effects of Positive Interventions on Happiness and Depressive Symptoms, with an Examination of Personality as a Moderator. Journal of Happiness Studies. 2012 May 20;14(2):591–612.
8. Gärling T, Jansson M. Sustainable Investment: Consequences for Psychological Well-Being. Sustainability. 2021 Aug 18;13(16):9256.
9. Fredrickson BL. The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist. 2001;56(3):218–26.
10. McCullough ME, Kilpatrick SD, Emmons RA, Larson DB. Is gratitude a moral affect? Psychological Bulletin. 2001;127(2):249–66.
11. McCullough ME, Emmons RA, Tsang JA. The grateful disposition: A conceptual and empirical topography. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2002;82(1):112–27.
12. Diessner R, Lewis G. Further Validation of the Gratitude, Resentment, and Appreciation Test (GRAT). The Journal of Social Psychology. 2007 Aug;147(4):445–7.
13. Morgan B, Gulliford L, Kristjánsson K. A new approach to measuring moral virtues: The Multi-Component Gratitude Measure. Personality and Individual Differences. 2017 Mar; 107:179–89.
14. Wood AM, Maltby J, Stewart N, Linley PA, Joseph S. A social-cognitive model of trait and state levels of gratitude. Emotion. 2008;8(2):281–90.
15. Amjad, N., Ahmad, S., & Zaidi, G. (2013). Exploring gratitude in a Muslim Pakistani context.
16. Anas MA, Husain A, Khan SM, Aijaz A. Development and Standardization of the Gratitude Scale. Journal of Educational, Health and Community Psychology. 2017 Apr 2;5(3):1.
17. Buja A, Swayne DF, Littman ML, Dean N, Hofmann H, Chen L. Data Visualization with Multidimensional Scaling. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics. 2008 Jun;17(2):444–72.
18. Young FW. Multidimensional Scaling. 2013.
19. Park N, Peterson C. Character Strengths and Happiness among Young Children: Content Analysis of Parental Descriptions. Journal of Happiness Studies. 2006 Sep;7(3):323–41.
20. Wang J. Culture Differences and English Teaching. English Language Teaching [Internet]. 2011 Jun 1;4(2):223. Available from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1080734.pdf
21. BBC (2014). Languages - Urdu - A Guide to Urdu - 10 Facts About the Urdu Language. Available online at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/languages/other/urdu/ guide/facts.shtml.
22. Qualitative research: introduction, sampling and approaches - Part II - Lynn Gertiser [Internet]. Gfmer.ch. 2014 [cited 2024 Aug 27]. Available from: https://www.gfmer.ch/SRH-Course-2013/Geneva-Workshop/Qualitative-research-2-Gertiser-2014.htm
23. Waltz CF, Strickland OL, Lenz ER. Measurement in Nursing and Health Research. 2016 Jul 1;
24. Kaiser HF. The Application of Electronic Computers to Factor Analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 1960 Apr;20(1):141–51.
25. Norm O'rourke, Hatcher L. a Step-By-Step Approach to Using SAS for Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling, Second Edition. 2013.
26. McGraw KO, Wong SP. Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods. 1996;1(1):30–46.
27. Weir JP. Quantifying Test-Retest Reliability Using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient and the SEM. The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research [Internet]. 2005;19(1):231. Available from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/d99a/790cce43f7f20d742f9d379b79de4f767740.pdf
28. Slick D. Psychometrics in neuropsychological assessment. In: Strauss E, Sherman E, Spreen O, editors. A compendium of neuropsychological tests. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2006. p. 1–43.
29. Wu B. Analysis of a Large-Scale Cold Air Weather Process in China during January 2021. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection. 2023 Jan 1;11(09):54–63.
30. Shaughnessy JJ, Zechmeister EB, Zechmeister JS. Research methods in psychology. Boston; London: Mcgraw-Hill Higher Education; 2009.
31. Arias, M. R. M., Lloreda, M. J. H., & Lloreda, M. V. H. (2014). Psicometría. S.A.: Alianza Editorial.
32. Nunnally JC. Psychometric theory. 2nd ed. New York: Mcgraw-Hill; 1978.
33. Colombo L, Chiara Ghislieri. The work-to-family conflict: Theories and measures. 2008 Jan 1;15(1):35–55.