COMPARING THE EFFECTS OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING AND TRADITIONAL LECTURES ON STUDENTS' ABILITY TO THINK CRITICALLY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY

Main Article Content

Dr. Parkha Afridi
Dr. Ismail Alam Khan
Dr. Bushra Afridi
Dr. Dawood Khan
Dr. Malghalara Khattak
Dr. Khadijah Bibi

Keywords

.

Abstract

Academic skill is a very important component in the higher learning institutions particularly in medical and dental faculties whereby advanced skills have to be used in making clinical decisions. This article therefore seeks to analyze the impact of Problem-Based Learning (PBL) and Traditional Lectures on Development of Critical Thinking Skills among Students. The current study involves a systematic literature analysis and review as well as a survey with a set of closed-ended questions with a group of selected undergrad students using standard measures such as the critical thinking skills test. Tables are utilized in the presentation of results with special consideration to the comparison of students exposed to PBL with students exposed to conventional lecturing techniques. It first serves to get an understanding of the numerous benefits that are in store if the learning process is made more interesting and more student-centered as opposed to making it more formal and instructor-centered.

Abstract 42 | PDF Downloads 10

References

1. Gennep A Van, Gennep A Van. Critical thinking [Internet]. Darbellay F, editor. Elgar Encyclopedia of Interdisciplinarity and Transdisciplinarity. Edward Elgar Publishing; 2024 [cited 2024 Sep 20]. 124–128 p. Available from: https://www.elgaronline.com/display /book/9781035317967/ch27.xml
2. Assistant Professor Education R. Promoting Critical Thinking Skills in the Classroom. Univers Res Reports [Internet]. 2024 May 17 [cited 2024 Sep 20];11(2):154–8. Available from: https://urr.shodhsagar.com/index.php/j/article/view/1276
3. Norman GR, Schmidt HG. Effectiveness of problem-based learning curricula: Theory, practice and paper darts. Med Educ. 2000;34(9):721–8.
4. Koh GCH, Khoo HE, Wong ML, Koh D. The effects of problem-based learning during medical school on physician competency: A systematic review. C Can Med Assoc J. 2008;178(1):34–41.
5. Azer SA. Problem-based learning in the fifth, sixth, and seventh grades: Assessment of students’ perceptions. Teach Teach Educ [Internet]. 2009;25(8):1033–42. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.03.023
6. Dolmans D, Gijbels D. Research on problem-based learning: Future challenges. Med Educ. 2013;47(2):214–8.
7. Dunaway GA. Adaption of team learning to an introductory graduate pharmacology course. Teach Learn Med [Internet]. 2005 [cited 2024 Sep 17];17(1):56–62. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/8040500_DEVELOPMENTS_Adaption_of_Team_Learning_to_an_Introductory_Graduate_Pharmacology_Course
8. Strobel J, Barneveld A van. When is PBL More Effective? A Meta-synthesis of Meta-analyses Comparing PBL to Conventional Classrooms. Interdiscip J Probl Learn [Internet]. 2009 Mar 24 [cited 2024 Sep 17];3(1):4. Available from: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/ijpbl/vol3/iss1/4
9. De Grave WS, Boshuizen HPA, Schmidt HG. Problem based learning: Cognitive and metacognitive processes during problem analysis. Instr Sci. 1996;24(5):321–41.
10. Barrows HS. Problem-based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief overview. New Dir Teach Learn. 1996;1996(68):3–12.
11. Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn? on JSTOR [Internet]. [cited 2024 Sep 17]. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23363859
12. Albanese. Albanese1993.Pdf.
13. Schmidt HG, Rotgans JI, Yew EHJ. The process of problem-based learning: What works and why. Med Educ. 2011;45(8):792–806.
14. Dochy F, Segers M, Van den Bossche P, Gijbels D. Effects of problem-based learning: a meta-analysis. Learn Instr. 2003 Oct 1;13(5):533–68.
15. Prince M, Felder R. The Many Faces of Inductive Teaching and Learning. J Coll Sci Teach. 2007;
16. Kirschner PA, Sweller J, Clark RE. Educational Psychologist Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching. 2010 [cited 2024 Sep 17]; Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=hedp20
17. Hmelo-Silver CE, Duncan RG, Chinn CA. Scaffolding and Achievement in Problem-Based and Inquiry Learning: A Response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educ Psychol [Internet]. 2007 [cited 2024 Sep 17];42(2):99–107. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00461520701263368
18. Loyens SMM, Magda J, Rikers RMJP. Self-directed learning in problem-based learning and its relationships with self-regulated learning. Educ Psychol Rev. 2008 Dec;20(4):411–27.
19. Belland BR, Kim C, Hannafin MJ. Educational Psychologist A Framework for Designing Scaffolds That Improve Motivation and Cognition. 2013 [cited 2024 Sep 17]; Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=hedp20
20. Schmidt HG, Moust JHC. What makes a tutor effective? A structural‐equations modeling approach to learning in problem‐based curricula. Acad Med. 1995;70(8):708–14.
21. Loyens SMM, Kirschner P, Paas F. Problem-Based Learning. Oxford Res Encycl Educ. 2019;