THE DYNAMICS OF GLOBAL WARMING: ANALYSIS OF CAUSES, IMPACTS, AND INTERNATIONAL MEASURES

Main Article Content

Syeda Lubna
Dr. Nosheen Qayyum
Naila Rafique
Dr. Tahir Hamid Ullah
Amina Iqbal
Arifa Naheed Rana
Maria Ashraf

Keywords

global, economics, Kyoto Protocol, green housegreen house, climate, carbon dioxide.

Abstract

Global warming is not solely a scientific issue but it also extends to various domains including, geopolitics, economics, local politics, sociology and individual lifestyles. The primary driver of global warming is carbon dioxide emissions, primarily resulting from the combustion of fossil fuels. Human activities significantly exacerbate the problem. Among the key international efforts to address global warming is the Kyoto Protocol, an international treaty established in Kyoto, Japan, which imposes obligations on industrialised nations to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Additionally, the intergovernmental Panel on climate change (IPCC) represents a crucial and effective initiative in combating global warming.

Abstract 83 | PDF Downloads 4

References

1. Ackerman, K. V., and E. T. Sundquist. 2008. Comparison of two U.S. power-plant carbon dioxide emissions data sets. Environmental Science & Technology 42(15):5688-5693.
2. Adams, P. N., and D. L. Inman. 2009. Climate Change and Potential Hotspots of Coastal Erosion Along the Southern California Coast—Final Report. CEC-500-2009-022-F, Sacramento, California Energy Commission.
3. Adger, W. N., J. Paavola, S. Huq, and M. J. Mace, eds. 2006. Fairness in Adaptation to Climate Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Adger, W. N., S. Agrawala, M. M. Q. Mirza, C. Conde, K. L. O’Brien, J. Pulhin, R. Pulwarty, B. Smit, and K. Takahashi. 2007. Assessment of adaptation practices, options, constraints and capacity. In Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability: Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. M. L. Parry, O. F. Canziani, J. P. Palutikof, C. E. Hanson, and P. J. Van Der Linden, eds. Cambridge:M. L. Parry, O. F. Canziani, J. P. Palutikof, C. E. Hanson, and P. J. Van Der Linden, eds. Cambridge:Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Adger, W. N., I. Lorenzoni, and K. O’Brien. 2009a. Adaptation now. In Adapting to Climate Change: Thresholds, Values, Governance. W. N. Adger, I. Lorenzoni, and K. L. O’Brien, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Adger, W. N., S. Dessai, M. Goulden, M. Hulme, I. Lorenzoni, D. R. Nelson, L. O. Naess, J. Wolf, and A. Wreford. 2009b. Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change? Climatic Change 93(3-4):335-354.
7. Adler, M. D., and E. A. Posner. 2006. New Foundations of Cost-Benefit Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Agrawala, S. 2004. Adaptation, development assistance and planning: Challenges and opportunities. IDS Bulletin—Institute of Development Studies 35:50-54.
8. Agrawal, A. 2008. The role of local institutions in adaptation to climate change. In Social Dimensions of Climate Change Workshop. Washington, DC: Social Development Department, The World Bank.
9. Agrawal, A., and N. Perrin. 2008. Climate Adaptation, Local Institutions, and Rural Livelihoods. Ann Arbor, MI: International Forestry Resources and Institutions Program, University of Michigan.
10. AGU (American Geophysical Union). 2009. Geoengineering the Climate System. A Position Statement of the American Geophysical Union (adopted by the AGU Council on December 13, 2009). Washington, DC: AGU.
11. Airame, S., J. E. Dugan, K. D. Lafferty, H. Leslie, D. A. Mcardle, and R. R. Warner. 2003. Applying ecological criteria to marine reserve design: A case study from the California Channel Islands. Ecological Applications 13 (1):S170-S184.
12. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2010. Advancing the Science of Climate Change. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/12782.
13. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2007). Atlas of Science Literacy, Volumes 1 and 2. Project 2061. Washington, DC: Author.
14. Ardoin, N.M., Falk, J., Heimlich, J.E., and Foutz, S. (2009). Behavior-change theories and free-choice environmental learning. In J.H. Falk (Ed.), Free-Choice Learning and the Environment (Ch. 4, pp. 57-76). Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
15. Bostrom, A., Morgan, M.G., Fischhoff, B., and Read, D. (1994). What do people know about global climate change? 1. Mental models. Risk Analysis, 14(6), 959-970.
16. Boyes, E., and Stanisstreet, M. (1993). The greenhouse effect: Children’s perceptions of causes, consequences, and cures. International Journal of Science Education, 15, 531-552.
17. Boyes, E., and Stanisstreet, M. (1997). Children’s models of understanding of two major global environmental issues (ozone layer and greenhouse effect). Research in Science and Technological Education, 15(1), 19-28.
18. Boyes, E., and Stanisstreet, M. (2001). Plus ca change, plus c’est la meme chose? School students’ ideas about the “greenhouse effect” a decade on. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 6, 77-101.
19. California Academy of Sciences. (2008). “Altered State” Exhibit Addresses Climate Change in California and Around the World: An Ongoing Exhibit. San Francisco.
20. Chabot Space and Science Center. (2010). Bill Nye’s Climate Lab Exhibit. Oakland, CA.
21. Coyle, K. (2005). Environmental Literacy in America: What Ten Years of NEETF/Roper Research and Related Studies Says About Environmental Literacy in the U.S. Washington, DC: National Environmental Education and Training Foundation.
22. Coyle, K. (2010). Training, Educating and Activating U.S. Hunters and Anglers and Other Constituencies on Climate Change. Reston, VA: Education and Training National Wildlife Federation.National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011.
23. Climate Change Education: Goals, Audiences, and Strategies: A Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13224.