EFFICACY OF 3% HYPERTONIC SALINE NEBULIZATION IN CHILDREN HOSPITALIZED WITH BRONCHIOLITIS

Main Article Content

Dr. Samiah Mazhar
Dr. Muhammad Faisal Shafiq
Dr. Iqra Amjad
Dr. Areej Fatima Khan
Dr. Syeda Ayesha Mazhar
Dr. Muhammad Ali Khan

Keywords

Bronchiolitis, Clinical Severity Score (CSS), Hypertonic Saline, Hospital Stay, Nebulization, Normal Saline

Abstract

Background: Acute bronchiolitis is a prevalent respiratory condition in newborns and young children, often requiring hospitalization.


Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of nebulization with 3% hypertonic saline in children who are hospitalized with bronchiolitis.


Study Design: Randomized Control Trial (RCT)


Study Setting: This study was conducted at the Department of Pediatrics CMH, Multan From November 2023 to February 2024.


Methodology: Within the Combined Military Hospital in Multan, the department of pediatrics was the location where this study was carried out. A total of 124 individuals diagnosed with acute bronchiolitis were split into two groups for the purpose of this study: The nebulized hypertonic saline was administered to Group A, while the nebulized normal saline was administered to Group B instead. Clinical severity scores (CSS) were assessed at baseline, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours. Recovery times and length of hospital stay were recorded. The data that was gathered was analyzed using IBM SPSS, specifically version 27.0.


Results:  The mean age of patients in Group A was 7.0 months, with a standard deviation of 4.61 months, while in Group B it was 5.97 ± 4.29 months. At the start of the study, Group A had an average oxygen saturation of 92.5±1.25% and Group B had an average of 92.2±0.91% (p=0.075). Group A had a mean oxygen saturation that was 98.3±0.60% higher by discharge than Group B, which was 97.6±0.91% (p<0.001). The mean CSS for the Group A was documented at 7. 9 ± 0. Group A had a mean CSS of 68 at the beginning of the study while that of Group B was 8. 2 ± 0. 68 (p=0. 017). At 12 hours, again there was an overall improvement in CSS and the mean CSS of Group A stood at 6. 9 ± 0. The mean composite satisfaction score of Group A was 65 while that of Group B was mean CSS of 7. 5 ± 0. 62 (p<0. 001). Finally, by 24 hours, Group A had a mean CSS of 4; Therefore, the results indicate that weitinger and colleagues were right to predict that using preoperative antibiotics for SP will decrease the incidence of SSI. 2 ± 0. 68, compared to 5. 4 ± 0. A total of twenty five percent in the Group B scored 64 percent and above (n = 64, that is p < 0. 001). On the average at 48 hours, the CSS for the Group A was 2. 6 ± 0. 59 which is relatively less compared to total number of respondents belongs to the group B which os only 3. 9 ± 0. 66 (p<0. 001). Within 72 hours, the Group A subjects had a mean CSS of 1. 5 ± 0. A confirmity test for equality of variances leaving to F (2,53) = 2. 7 ± 0. 65 (p<0. 001). The overall use of oxygen therapy showed significantly an increase in Group B (23. 3±2. 37 hours) as compared to Group A (16. 2±2. 47 hours); p<0. 001.


Conclusion: Thus, nebulized hypertonic saline holds the advantage of significantly more favorable such clinical severity, length of hospital stay, and recovery in acute bronchiolitis. These results suggest that hypertonic saline should be used as a better treatment choice of this illness.


 

Abstract 26 | pdf Downloads 4

References

1. Linssen RS, Teirlinck AC, van Boven M, Biarent D, Stona L, Amigoni A, Comoretto RI, Leteurtre S, Bruandet A, Bentsen GK, Drage IM. Increasing burden of viral bronchiolitis in the pediatric intensive care unit; an observational study. Journal of critical care. 2022 Apr 1;68:165-8.
2. Ghazaly MM, Abu Faddan NH, Raafat DM, Mohammed NA, Nadel S. Acute viral bronchiolitis as a cause of pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome. European Journal of Pediatrics. 2021 Apr;180:1229-34.
3. Bottau P, Liotti L, Laderchi E, Palpacelli A, Calamelli E, Colombo C, Serra L, Cazzato S. Something is changing in viral infant bronchiolitis approach. Frontiers in Pediatrics. 2022 Apr 14;10:865977.
4. Kawilarang M, Santoso TA, Dharmansyah RP, Angela A, Ferdiaananda MR. Nebulization Therapy in Pediatric Patients with Bronchiolitis: A Literature Review. Jurnal Keperawatan. 2024;16(2):821-40.
5. Mammas IN, Drysdale SB, Rath B, Theodoridou M, Papaioannou G, Papatheodoropoulou A, Koutsounaki E, Koutsaftiki C, Kozanidou E, Achtsidis V, Korovessi P. Update on current views and advances on RSV infection. International Journal of Molecular Medicine. 2020 Aug 1;46(2):509-20.
6. Sebina I, Phipps S. The contribution of neutrophils to the pathogenesis of RSV bronchiolitis. Viruses. 2020 Jul 27;12(8):808.
7. Douros K, Everard ML. Time to say goodbye to bronchiolitis, viral wheeze, reactive airways disease, wheeze bronchitis and all that. Frontiers in pediatrics. 2020 May 5;8:218.
8. Nazif JM, Taragin BH, Azzarone G, Rinke ML, Liewehr S, Choi J, Esteban-Cruciani N. Clinical factors associated with chest imaging findings in hospitalized infants with bronchiolitis. Clinical Pediatrics. 2017 Oct;56(11):1054-9.
9. Katiyar SK, Gaur SN, Solanki RN, Sarangdhar N, Suri JC, Kumar R, Khilnani GC, Chaudhary D, Singla R, Koul PA, Mahashur AA. Indian Guidelines on nebulization therapy. indian journal of tuberculosis. 2022 Jan 1;69:S1-91.
10. Goralski JL, Wu D, Thelin WR, Boucher RC, Button B. The in vitro effect of nebulised hypertonic saline on human bronchial epithelium. European Respiratory Journal. 2018 May 1;51(5).
11. Wang EE, Milner R, Allen U, Maj H. Bronchodilators for treatment of mild bronchiolitis: A factorial randomised trial. Arch Dis Child. 1992; 67:289–93
12. Toivonen L, Karppinen S, Schuez-Havupalo L, Teros-Jaakkola T, Mertsola J, Waris M, Peltola V. Respiratory syncytial virus infections in children 0–24 months of age in the community. Journal of Infection. 2020 Jan 1;80(1):69-75.
13. Salman MK, Ahmed J, Khan M, et al. Comparison of hypertonic saline and normal saline nebulization in treating infants with acute viral bronchiolitis. Pak J Med Sci. 2022;38(5):1174-78.
14. Ralston SL, Lieberthal AS, Meissner HC, et al. Clinical practice guideline: The diagnosis, management, and prevention of bronchiolitis. Pediatrics. 2014;134(5)
15. Gupta HV, Gupta VV, Kaur G. Effectiveness of 3% hyper- tonic saline nebulization in acute bronchiolitis among Indian children: A quasi-experimental study. Perspect Clin Res 2016;7(2): 88-93
16. Elesh H, El-khaleegy H. Efficacy of Nebulized Hypertonic Saline 3% in comparison to Nebulized Normal Saline 0.9% in Children with Acute Bronchiolitis. International Journal of Medical Arts. 2021 Jul 1;3(3):1584-8.
17. Islam KT, Mollah AH, Matin AB, Begum MA. Comparative efficacy of nebulized 3% hypertonic saline versus 0.9% Normal saline in children with acute bronchiolitis. Bangladesh J Child Health. 2018 Dec 17;42(3):130-7.
18. Hossain RM, Shams S, Kader MA, Pervez M, Bhuiyan MF, Hasan MM, Mollah MA. Efficacy of nebulized hypertonic saline versus normal saline and salbutamol in treating acute bronchiolitis in a tertiary hospital: a randomized control trial. Int J Contemp Pediatr. 2022 Jun;9:523-8.
19. Nizam R, Khalid A, Shafique M, Imtiaz M, Masood S, Masood MK. Comparison of Mean Hospital Stay after Nebulization with 3% Hypertonic Saline vs Salbutamol in Treatment of Bronchiolitis. National Journal of Health Sciences. 2024 Jun 28;9(2):110-4.
20. Zhang L, Mendoza-Sassi RA, Wainwright C, Klassen TP. Nebulized hypertonic saline solution for acute bronchiolitis in infants. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2018; 4: CD006458
21. Saleem M, Saleem M, Khurshid A. Hypertonic saline versus normal saline nebulization in hospitalized children with acute bronchiolitis. Professional Med J 2020; 27(12):2734-2738.