MORPHOLOGICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL (SDS-PAGE) PROFILING OF CHICKPEA CULTIVARS TREATED WITH DIFFERENT CONCENTRATION OF SALT (NaCl)
Main Article Content
Keywords
Salt Stress, Chickpea, SDS-PAGE, Multi-Statistical Analyzing Tools (MSAT), Cluster analysis, PCA.
Abstract
The research was conducted at the University of Swat, delved into the impact of salt (NaCl) stress on chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars including; Karak-1, KC-98, Lawaghar-2000, Sheenghar, Karak-2, Karak-3, Fakhar-e-Thal and Chattan obtained from Agricultural Research Station Ahmad Wala Karak, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pakistan with three local varieties; Bittal-2016, Noor-91 and Noor-2013. The study encompassed eight distinct traits evaluated under varying NaCl concentrations, including control, 50, 100, and 200 mM. The average mean of plant height was recorded as 26.75±8.410063cm, number of primary branches 75±1.493039, secondary branches 8.75±2.657536, days of flowering 112.33±1.45, number of flowerings 4.04±2.33, number of pods 1.76±5.66 and plant biomass 33.33±1.76. The obtained data was analyzed with statistical software PAST 4.08 version using Multi-statistical Analysing Tools (MSAT) for significance results. Principle component Analysis (PCA) scattered plot showed positive correlation in a bulk of variance at Component-I in Primary branches (Pr.Br.), secondary branches (S. Br), pods per plants (PPP), while Cluster- II (Number of flower (NOF),100 Seed weight (100 SW) and Cluster-III (Plant height (PH), Days of flowering (DOF) with very little contribution of some scattered genotypes. The first two axis represent 85% of variance in the correlation matrix, while the first 3 axis represent 94% of variance that signifies our results. Principal Component-1, having 75% of variance while PC-2 and 3 with 15% and 12% variance respectively. The SDS-PAGE, dendrogram shows the protein profile relates three distinct Clusters; Cluster- I (Chattan and Sheenghar) Cluster- II (Karak-3, Fakhar-e-Thal and KC-98) while Karak-2 made a separate outline. The tolerable genotypes showed 100% performance in Cluster-II. Noteworthy findings emerged, such as the significant increase in a 43 kDa protein in the salt-tolerant genotype Fakhar-e-Thal compared to Chattan. Furthermore, the investigation unveiled distinct protein profiles and clustering patterns among genotypes based on their origins and salt tolerance. This research underscores the relevance of comprehending salt stress adaptation in chickpea cultivation, particularly in regions prone to salinity stress. The study identified the accessions KC-89, Fakhar-e-Thal and Karak-3 potential against salinity up to 50mM NaCl concentration. These cultivars also found with a similar protein banding pattern and clustered in a same group by analyzing through a reliable biochemical technique, SDS-PAGE.
References
2. Ahmad, Z., Mumtaz, A., Nisar, M. and Khan, N. (2012). Diversity analysis of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) germplasm and its implications for conservation and crop breeding. Agricultural sciences, 3(5),723-731.
3. Arefian, M., Vessal, S., & Bagheri, A. (2014). Biochemical changes in response to salinity in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) during early stages of seedling growth. Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, 24(6), 1849-1857.
4. Asghar, R., Siddique, T., & Afzal, M. (2003). Inter and intra-specific variation in SDS-PAGE electrophoregrams of total seed protein in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) germplasm. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 6(24), 1991-1995.
5. Flowers, T.J., Gaur, P.M., Gowda, C.L.L., Krishnamurthy, L., Samineni, S., Siddique, K.H.M., Turner, N.C., Vadez, V., Varshney, R.K., & Colmer, T.D. 2009. Salt sensitivity in chickpea. Plant, cell and Environment, 33, 490-509.
6. IBPGR, ICRISAT and ICARDA. 1993. Descriptor for chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) International Board for Plant Genetic Resources, Italy; International Crop Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru, India and International Center for Agricultural Research in Dry Areas,
a. Aleppo, Syria.
7. Jukanti, A.K., Gaur, P.M., Gowda, C.L. & Chibbar, R.N. (2012) Nutritional Quality and Health Benefits of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): A Review. British Journal of Nutrition, 108 (S1), S11-S26.
8. Jiang, Y. Yan, Y Wang, X. Zhu, G. Xu, Y.J. (2016) Hepcidin inhibition on the effect of Osteogenesis in Zebrafish, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 476(1):1-6.
9. Molassiotis, A., Sotiropoulos, T., Tanou, G., Diamantidis, G., & Therios, I. (2006). Boron-induced oxidative damage and antioxidant and nucleolytic responses in shoot tips culture of the apple rootstock EM 9 (Malus domestica Borkh). Environmental and Experimental Botany, 56: 54-62.
10. Netra, N., and Prasad, S. R., (2007) Identification of rice hybrids and their parental lines based on seed, seedling characters, chemical tests and gel electrophoresis of total soluble seed proteins. Seed Science and Technology, 35(1), 176-186.
11. Nisar, M., Ghafoor, A., Khan, M. R., Ahmad, H., Qureshi, A. S., & Ali, H. (2007). Genetic diversity and geographic relationship among local and exotic chickpea germplasm. Pak. J. Bot, 39(5), 1575-1581.
12. Roy, F., Boye, J. I., & Simpson, B. K. (2010). Bioactive proteins and peptides in pulse crops: Pea, chickpea and lentil. Food research international, 43(2), 432-442.
13. Silva, P., & Gerós, H. (2009). Regulation by salt of vacuolar H+-ATPase and H+-pyrophosphatase activities and Na+/H+ exchange. Plant signaling & behavior, 4(8), 718-726.
14. Toker, C., Lluch, C., Tejera, N. A., Serraj, R., & Siddique, K. H. M. (2007). 23 Abiotic Stresses. Chickpea breeding and management, 474.
15. Varshney, R. K., Thudi, M., Nayak, S. N., Gaur, P. M., Kashiwagi, J., Krishnamurthy, L., & Viswanatha, K. P. (2014). Genetic dissection of drought tolerance in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 127, 445-462.
16. Wadood, H. Z., Latif, A., Mukhtar, H., Javed, M., Mukhtar, H., & Rehman, Y. (2021). Planktonic cells of Staphylococcus and Bacillus species capable of faster chromium reduction in short incubation times as compared to their biofilms. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 14, 1-9.