EXPRESSION PATTERNS OF BRCA1, E-CADHERIN, AND VEGF IN DIFFERENT HISTOLOGICAL GRADES OF BREAST CANCER AMONG LOCAL PATIENTS

Main Article Content

Dr. Zunaira Qayyum
Dr. Saad Maroof Saeed
Dr. Iram Asrar
Dr. Sadaf Zahid
Dr. Sakina Jamil
Dr. Sarah Riaz

Keywords

Breast cancer, BRCA1, E-Cadherin, VEGF, histological grading, immunohistochemistry, biomarkers, prognosis

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer is a commonly diagnosed neoplasm with extensive heterogeneity as far as the histological grade and prognosis are concerned. Hence, the description of the expression patterns of those genes which include BRCA1, E-Cadherin, and VEGF can enhance the diagnostic precision and to an extent help in selecting treatment options that are most effective for the patient. The objectives of this study are to assess the biomarkers’ levels and their prognostic associations with the histological grades of breast cancer in a local population.


Aim: To establish the reality or likelihood of BRCA1, E-Cadherin, VEGF, and also their relation and value as biomarkers of histological grade in breast cancer patients.


Method: An historical comparative descriptive design was used, the study involved patients with histologically proven breast carcinoma whose tissue specimens were available. Specimens were obtained from surgical resection and biopsies and formally in fixed, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned according to standard pathological procedures. Additionally, a sufficient immunohistochemical staining of BRCA1, E-Cadherin and VEGF were done based on intensity and distribution of the specimens. The authors used chi-square tests and ANOVA to figure out the variables and the extent of relation between the parameters.


Results: The current qualitative investigation revealed that BRCA1, E-Cadherin, and VEGF expressions had uneven distribution of signal intensity in the different grades of histological adenocarcinomas. The results as for high-grade tumors revealed a down regulation of BRCA1 while E-Cadherin has increased levels of VEGF factor. Regression tests indicated reliable relationships between biomarkers and histological grade regarding the aggressiveness of the tumor and the prognosis of the patient. The prognostic analysis shows the correlation of a given biomarker to the result of patient’s condition, such as survival and recurrence rates.


Conclusion: BRCA1, E-Cadherin and VEGF have been demonstrated to play a critical role in the progression and characteristics of breast cancer in the findings. The differences occur in association with the histologic grades and therefore has prospect for refining the diagnostic efficacy and prognosis of the disease. Thus, the future research might revolve around the enlargement of the sample and identification of new biomarkers to improve breast cancer treatment.

Abstract 0 | Pdf Downloads 0

References

1. E. A. Rakha, "New Advances in Molecular Breast Cancer Pathology," Seminars in Cancer Biology, vol. 72, pp. 102-113, 2021.
2. S. M. Bhat, "Chapter Two - Novel insights into DNA methylation-based epigenetic regulation of breast tumor angiogenesis," International Review of Cell and Molecular Biology, vol. 380, pp. 63-96, 2023.
3. U. Mehraj, "Chemokines in triple-negative breast cancer heterogeneity: New challenges for clinical implications," Seminars in Cancer Biology, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 769-783, 2022.
4. S. A. Sosse, "Chapter 20 - The involvement of human papillomavirus in breast cancer in general and the different prognostic biomarkers in triple-negative breast cancer," Oncogenic Viruses, pp. 335-357, 2023.
5. Y. Liang, "Metastatic heterogeneity of breast cancer: Molecular mechanism and potential therapeutic targets," Seminars in Cancer Biology, vol. 60, pp. 14-27, 2020.
6. S. Jeibouei, "Human-derived Tumor-On-Chip model to study the heterogeneity of breast cancer tissue," Biomaterials Advances, vol. 162, p. 213915, 2024.
7. V. Subramaniyan, "A review on epidermal growth factor receptor's role in breast and non-small cell lung cancer," Chemico-Biological Interactions, vol. 351, p. 109735, 2022.
8. S. Ghafouri-Fard, "An update on the role of long non-coding RNAs in the pathogenesis of breast cancer," Pathology - Research and Practice, vol. 219, p. 153373, 2021.
9. N. Rahimian, "Non-coding RNAs related to angiogenesis in gynecological cancer," Gynecologic Oncology, vol. 161, no. 3, pp. 896-912, 2021.
10. O. A. Sukocheva, "The crucial role of epigenetic regulation in breast cancer anti-estrogen resistance: Current findings and future perspectives," Seminars in Cancer Biology, vol. 82, pp. 35-59, 2022.
11. E. Schoutrop, "Molecular, cellular and systemic aspects of epithelial ovarian cancer and its tumor microenvironment," Seminars in Cancer Biology, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 207-223, 2022.
12. M. Biancolella, "Genetics and Genomics of Breast Cancer: update and translational perspectives," Seminars in Cancer Biology, vol. 72, pp. 27-35, 2021.
13. D. Ribatti, "Controversial role of mast cells in breast cancer tumor progression and angiogenesis," Clinical Breast Cancer, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 486-491, 2021.
14. S. Salimifard, "Cancer associated fibroblasts as novel promising therapeutic targets in breast cancer," Pathology - Research and Practice, vol. 216, no. 5, p. 152915, 2020.
15. K. V. Anilkumar, "miRNAs in the prognosis of triple-negative breast cancer: A review," Life Sciences, vol. 333, p. 122183, 2023.
16. J. Borghesi, "Evaluation of immunohistopathological profile of tubular and solid canine mammary carcinomas," Research in Veterinary Science, vol. 136, pp. 119-126, 2021.
17. M. Habiburrahman, "Role of DEK in carcinogenesis, diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic outcome of breast cancer: An evidence-based clinical review," Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, vol. 181, p. 103897, 2023.
18. Y. Peng, "JAM2 predicts a good prognosis and inhibits invasion and migration by suppressing EMT pathway in breast cancer," International Immunopharmacology, vol. 103, p. 108430, 2022.

Most read articles by the same author(s)