EFFECT OF WAIST HIP RATIO AND BODY MASS INDEX ON SENSORY BLOCK LEVEL OF SPINAL ANAESTHESIA AND HAEMODYNAMIC CHANGES DURING CAESAREAN SECTION

Main Article Content

Dr Vindu Yadav
Dr Priyanka Singh
Dr Jharna Mili

Keywords

waist-hip ratio, anthropometric measurement, spinal anesthesia, body mass index

Abstract

we aimed to determine the effect of some anthropometric values on sensorial block characteristics of spinal anesthesia and hemodynamics in patients undergoing elective cesarean sections performed under spinal anesthesia. Weight, length, and body mass index ,waist and hip circumferences ratio of 200 patients were measured. Spinal anesthesia was applied while the patient was sitting erect. The time of sensorial block to reach the T4 level and the maximum sensorial block level were recorded in each case. Cases who developed hypotension and bradycardia during the spinal anesthesia were recorded. In this study hypotension was observed in 54% of patients and it was determined that the prevalence of hypotension increased in patients with a higher body mass index, a higher waist/hip ratio. It was found that the prevalence of bradycardia increased in patients with a  higher body mass index and a higher waist/hip ratio. This study also determined a positive correlation between the values of height, weight  and the time of sensorial block to reach the T4 dermatome; and a positive correlation between the body mass index and the dermatome area of the maximum sensorial block In line with the values provided by simple and non-time consuming anthropometric measurements the patients who are planned to receive a spinal anesthesia may be priorly prepared against adverse effects of bradycardia and hypotension that may develop, and to estimate the sensorial block characteristics of the spinal anesthesia.

Abstract 31 | PDF Downloads 8

References

1. S Hogan QH, Prost R, Kulier A, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of cerebrospinal fluid volume and the influence of body habitus and abdominal pressure. Anesthesiology. 1996;84:1341-9
2. Richardson MG, Wissler RN. Density of lumbar cerebrospinal fluid in pregnant and nonpregnant humans. Anesthesiology. 1996;85:326–30.
3. Hirabayashi Y, Shimizu R, Fukuda H, et al. Anatomical configuration of the spinal column in the supine position: Comparison of pregnant and non-pregnant women. Br J Anaesth. 1995;75:6–8.
4. Fassoulaki A, Gatzou V, Petropoulos G, Siafaka I. Spread of subarachnoid block, intraoperative local anaesthetic requirements and postoperative analgesic requirements in Caesarean section and total abdominal hysterectomy. Br J Anaesth. 2004;93:678–82.
5. Ni TT, Zhou Y, Yong AC, Wang L, and Zhou QH, “Intra-abdominal pressure, vertebral column length, and spread of spinal anesthesia in parturients undergoing cesarean section: an observational study. PLoS one 2018; 13
6. Zhang N, He L, and Ni JX, Level of sensory block after spinal anesthesia as a predictor of hypotension in parturient. Medicine (Baltimore), 2017 96; e7184 .
7. Organization WH. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. 2000:World Health Organization.
8. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Curtin LR. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999-2008. JAMA. 2010;303(3):235-41.
9. Bergholt T, Lim LK, Jørgensen JS, Robson MS. Maternal body mass index in the first trimester and risk of cesarean delivery in nulliparous women in spontaneous labor. Am J Obstet And Gynecol. 2007;196(2):163. e1-163. e5.
10. Villamor E, Cnattingius S. Interpregnancy weight change and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes: a population-based study. The Lancet. 2006;368(9542):1164-70.
11. Rodrigues FR, Brandão MJN. Regional anaesthesia for cesarean section in obese pregnant women: A retrospective study. Braz J Anaesthesiol. 2011;61(1):13-20.
12. Nucci LB, Schmidt MI, Duncan BB, Fuchs SC, Fleck ET, Maria Margarida Santos Britto MMS. Nutritional status of pregnant women: prevalence and associated pregnancy outcomes. Revista De Saude Publica. 2001;35(6):502-07.
13. Vallejo MC. Anaesthetic management of the morbidly obese parturient. Curr Opin in Anaesthesiol. 2007;20(3):175-80.
14. Chu SY, Kim SY, Schmid CH, Dietz PM, Callaghan WM, Lau J, et al. Maternal obesity and risk of cesarean delivery: a meta-analysis. Obesity Reviews. 2007;8(5):385-94.
15. Nani FS, Torres MLA. Correlation between the body mass index (BMI) of pregnant women and the development of hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. Braz J Anaesthesiol. 2011;61(1):21-30.
16. Mitra J. Prevention of hypotension following spinal anesthesia in [10] caesarean section-then and now. Kathmandu University Medical J. 2012.8(4):415-19.
17. Gupta S. Vasopressors and tight control of maternal blood pressure during [11] cesarean delivery: a rocky alliance. J of Anaesthesiology. Clin Pharmacol. 2013;29(1):1.
18. Miller RD, Pardo M. Basics of Anaesthesia E-Book. 2011: Elsevier Health [12] Sciences.
19. Langesaeter E, Rosseland LA, Stubhaug A: Continuous invasive blood pressure and cardiac output monitoring during cesarean delivery: A randomized,double-blind comparison of low-dose versus high-dose spinal anesthesia with intravenous phenylephrine or placebo infusion. Anesthesiology,2008;109: 856–63
20. Arzola C, Wieczorek PM: Efficacy of low-dose bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia for caesarean delivery: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth,2011; 107: 308–18
21. Reyes M, Pan PH: Very low-dose spinal anesthesia for cesarean section in a morbidly obese preeclamptic patient and its potential implications. Int J Obstet Anesth, 2004; 13(2): 99–102
22. Norris MC: Height, weight, and the spread of subarachnoid hyperbaric bupivacaine in the term parturient. Anesth Analg, 1988; 67: 555–58
23. Carvalho B, Collins J, Drover DR et al: ED(50) and ED(95) of intrathecal bupivacaine in morbidly obese patients undergoing cesarean delivery. Anesth, 2011; 114: 529–35
24. Magalhães E, Govêia CS, de Araújo Ladeira LC, Nascimento BG, Kluthcouski SM. Ephedrine versus phenylephrine: prevention of hypotension during spinal block for cesarean section and effects on the fetus. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2009 Jan-Feb;59(1):11-20.
25. Ronenson AM, Sitkin SI, Savel'eva IuV. Effect of intra-abdominal pressure in pregnant women on level of spina block and frequency of hypotension during cesarean section. Anesteziol Reanimatol. 2014 Jul-Aug;59(4):26-9.
26. Marshalov DV, Shifman EM, Salov IA, Petrenko AP. Correction of local anesthetic dosage in spinal anesthesia in pregnant women with obesity. Anesteziol Reanimatol. 2014 Nov-Dec;59(6):19-23.
27. Ozkan Seyhan T, Orhan-Sungur M, Basaran B, Savran Karadeniz M, Demircan F, Xu Z, Sessler DI. The effect of intra-abdominal pressure on sensory block level of single-shot spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: an observational study. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2015 Feb;24(1):35-40.
28. Polin CM, Hale B, Mauritz AA, Habib AS, Jones CA, Strouch ZY, Dominguez JE. Anesthetic management of super-morbidly obese parturients for cesarean delivery with a double neuraxial catheter technique: a case series. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2015 Aug;24(3):276-80.
29. Ngaka TC, Coetzee JF, Dyer RA. The influence of body mass index on sensorimotor block and vasopressor requirement during spinal anaesthesia for elective Caesarean section. Anesth Analg. 2016 Dec;123(6): 1527-34.
30. Baysal PK, Golboyu BE, Ekinci M, Güden M, Ahiskalioglu A, Celik EC. Effects of anthropometric measurements on spinal anaesthesia block characteristics and hemodynamics. Medeniyet Med J. 2016;31(1):23-31.
31. Kuok CH, Huang CH, Tsai PS, Ko YP, Lee SW, Hsu WY, Hung FY. Preoperative measurement of maternal abdominal circumference relates the initial sensory block level of spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: An observational study. Taiwanese J Obstetr Gynecol. 2016;55(6):810-4.Lamon AM, Einhorn LM, Cooter M, Habib AS. The impact of body mass index on the risk of high spinal block in parturients undergoing cesarean delivery: a retrospective cohort study. J Anesth. 2017 Aug;31(4):552-8.