Telehealth and telemedicine, Challenges, opportunities and its implementation: An emerging global research agenda

Main Article Content

Muhammad Soaib Said
Faryal Jahan
Muhammad Noumann Arif
Iqra Saleem Naz Babari
Maysoon Raed Bassam Alnajdawi
Ishfaq A Bukhari
Shafiq Ali Shah
Izharullah
Tayyaba Ghazanfar
Asif Mehmood Hashmi

Keywords

Telehealth, Telemedicine, health care system, Traditional medicines Traditional medicines

Abstract


ABSTRACT
Background: This paper discussed about telehealth, telemedicine, or e-health their challenges and opportunities, and their implementations in the healthcare system. This is a new system which is adopted during the 21st century. It provides a faster way to cure a patient's disease or improve health.
Primary objective: The objective of this study was to conduct a survey about the emergence of telehealth and telemedicine, its implementation, adaptation, awareness, and satisfaction in the community.
Method/design: A structured questionnaire including thirteen questions about telehealth, telemedicine, e-pharmacy, and e-health has been prepared and circulated among the general population through survey.
Setting: The study was conducted in Rawalakot and Islamabad.
Participants: 200 participants are involved in the study.
Intervention: The study was also conducted to communicate with larger community to give them awareness related to telehealth and its effectiveness.
Primary out commeasures. :The study was very helpful in educated and non-educated community of the specific cities.
Results: While conducting the research based on studies, it was found that about 55% people are aware of telehealth and 20% of people are using online services and 33.4% of people are satisfied with it and 50.5% of people said it is convenient than traditional health care system.
Conclusion: A significant opportunity to improve value-based clinical care, health promotion, and disease prevention is presented by the development of novel telehealth-related capabilities and their integration into care delivery systems.
Abstract 60 | Pdf Downloads 8

References

1. Voran D. Telemedicine and beyond. Missouri medicine. 2015;112(2):129.
2. Ellimoottil C, An L, Moyer M, Sossong S, Hollander JE. Challenges and opportunities faced by large health systems implementing telehealth. Health Affairs. 2018;37(12):1955-9.
3. Stumpf S, Zalunardo R, Chen RJ. Barriers to telemedicine implementation. Healthcare informatics. 2002;19(4):45-8.doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1638_21
4. Weinstein RS, Lopez AM, Joseph BA, Erps KA, Holcomb M, Barker GP, et al. Telemedicine, telehealth, and mobile health applications that work: opportunities and barriers. The American journal of medicine. 2014;127(3):183-7.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56917-4_17
5. Hersh. Compressive elevation of the literature on telehealth. 2001.
6. Pan E, Cusack C, Hook J, Vincent A, Kaelber DC, Bates DW, et al. The value of provider-to-provider telehealth. Telemedicine and e-Health. 2008;14(5):446-53.
7. Bashshur RL, Reardon TG, Shannon GW. Telemedicine: a new health care delivery system. Annual review of public health. 2000;21(1):613-37.
8. Grigsby J, Kaehny MM, Sandberg EJ, Schlenker RE, Shaughnessy PW. Effects and effectiveness of telemedicine. Health care financing review. 1995;17(1):115.
9. Craig J, Petterson V. Introduction to the practice of telemedicine. Journal of telemedicine and telecare. 2005;11(1):3-9.
10. Chike-Harris KE, Durham C, Logan A, Smith G, DuBose-Morris R. Integration of telehealth education into the health care provider curriculum: a review. Telemedicine and e-Health. 2021;27(2):137-49.https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2019.0261
11. Lucas J, Villarroel M. Telemedicine Use among Adults: United States, 2021; NCHS Data Brief, no 445. National Center for Health Statistics: Hyattsville, MD, USA. 2022.
12. Mahtta D, Daher M, Lee MT, Sayani S, Shishehbor M, Virani SS. Promise and perils of telehealth in the current era. Current cardiology reports. 2021;23:1-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-021-01544-w
13. Colucci M, Baldo V, Baldovin T, Bertoncello C. A “matter of communication”: A new classification to compare and evaluate telehealth and telemedicine interventions and understand their effectiveness as a communication process. Health informatics journal. 2019;25(2):446-60.https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582177471
14. Dinesen B, Nonnecke B, Lindeman D, Toft E, Kidholm K, Jethwani K. Personalized telehealth in the future: a global research agenda. Journal of medical Internet research. 2016;18(3):e53.
15. Giacalone A, Marin L, Febbi M, Franchi T, Tovani-Palone MR. eHealth, telehealth, and telemedicine in the management of the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond: Lessons learned and future perspectives. World Journal of Clinical Cases. 2022;10(8):2363.
16. Bashshur R, Shannon G, Krupinski E, Grigsby J. The taxonomy of telemedicine. Telemedicine and e-Health. 2011;17(6):484-94.doi: 10.1089/tmj.2011.0103.
17. Jumreornvong O, Yang E, Race J, Appel J. Telemedicine and medical education in the age of COVID-19. Academic Medicine. 2020.
18. Scott RE, Chowdhury MFU, Varghese S. Telehealth policy: looking for global complementarity. Journal of telemedicine and telecare. 2002;8(3_suppl):55-7.doi: 10.1258 /13576330260440871.
19. Miller EA. Solving the disjuncture between research and practice: telehealth trends in the 21st century. Health Policy. 2007;82(2):133-41.doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.09.011.

Most read articles by the same author(s)