MAPPING COUNSELING STRATEGIES: A SCOPING REVIEW OF HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS' COUNSELLING SKILLS FOR FACILITATING MODERN CONTRACEPTIVE USE IN FAMILY PLANNING

Main Article Content

Dr. Farrah Pervaiz
Dr Humaira Mahmood
Dr. Faiza Rabbani
Dr. Shabana Saleem
Dr. Mariyum Sarfraz
Dr. Muhammad Farrukh Habib

Keywords

Client-Centered Counseling, Healthcare providers, Modern contraceptives, Training

Abstract

Background: The International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD) and the Bruce Quality of Care Framework underscored the significance of high-quality, person-centered contraceptive counseling. Despite various frameworks, few address the interpersonal aspects of counseling or the negative experiences faced by clients. Recent shifts towards a human rights framework emphasize quality care as an intrinsic goal, intertwining person-centered counseling with increased contraceptive prevalence, which may create conflicting priorities.


Objectives: This scoping review aims to map the strategies and skills healthcare providers use to facilitate modern contraceptive use, especially Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptives (LARC). It seeks to synthesize existing evidence on counseling strategies, evaluate their effectiveness, and highlight knowledge gaps to inform future research and policy development.


Methods: Following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, a systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Cochrane Library, Taylor & Francis, and Google Scholar for articles published between January 2019 and July 2024. The search strategy included keywords and synonyms related to family planning, counseling, and healthcare providers. Two reviewers independently screened and selected studies based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria.


Results: The review identified several key strategies and skills used by healthcare providers in counseling for modern contraceptive use. Effective counseling strategies included privacy, confidentiality, respect, empathy, and trust, along with specific steps in the counseling process. The review also highlighted gaps in the literature, particularly in addressing the negative experiences of clients and the interpersonal aspects of counseling.


Conclusions: The scoping review highlights the importance of various interventions in family planning counseling, emphasizing the positive impact of educational initiatives on healthcare providers' confidence and knowledge, particularly regarding LARCs. High-quality, client-centered counseling and shared decision-making are crucial for informed patient choices and reduced discontinuation rates. Continuous professional development and training significantly enhance LARC service provision, while addressing provider biases improves empathetic care and accessibility for young people. Regular training is essential for improving contraceptive uptake and providing client-centered counseling. 

Abstract 36 | PDF Downloads 11

References

1. Ermias Y, Averbach SH, Dey AK, Gebrehanna E, Holt K. The association between quality of contraceptive counseling and selection of contraceptive method post-counseling among women in Ethiopia. Contraception. 2023;124:110060.
2. family-planning-rights-brief.
3. Parasiuk V, Оnyshko О. Protection of the person’s reproductive rights in Ukraine and in the European countries. Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence. 2023 Jun 23;(2):120–8.
4. Hardee K, Jordan S. Advancing Rights-Based Family Planning from 2020 to 2030 Plain Language Summary. Open Access J Contracept [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2024 Jul 12];2021:12–157. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2147/OAJC.S324678
5. Teresa M, Sánchez R, Gurashi R, Ferreri E, Corvino I, Andrea FD’, et al. Èquipe, community, traditional values, and reproductive rights. [cited 2024 Jul 12]; Available from: https://demo.istat.it/strasaaaaa/index.html.
6. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Ann Intern Med [Internet]. 2018 Oct 2 [cited 2024 Jul 12];169(7):467–73. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30178033/
7. Travis Satnarine. Systematic Review Methodology: Conducting High-Quality Reviews and Understanding Their Significance in Evidence-Based Practice. Journal For International Medical Graduates. 2023 May 4;2(1).
8. Viera Valencia LF, Garcia Giraldo D. 済無No Title No Title No Title. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 951–952. 2019;2:0–31.
9. Danna K, Angel A, Kuznicki J, Lemoine L, Lerma K, Kalamar A. Leveraging the Client-Provider Interaction to Address Contraceptive Discontinuation: A Scoping Review of the Evidence That Links Them. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2021;9(4):948–63.
10. Hardee K, Jordan S. Advancing Rights-Based Family Planning from 2020 to 2030. Open Access J Contracept. 2021;Volume 12:157–71.
11. Suchman L, Vallin J, Quintero Veloz X, Kanchan L, Gebrehanna E, Uttekar B, et al. Balancing client preferences and population-level goals: a qualitative study of the ways in which public health providers and facility administrators interpret and incentivise quality of care in contraceptive counselling in Ethiopia, Mexico and India. Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2023;31(1).
12. Soin KS, Yeh PT, Gaffield ME, Ge C, Kennedy CE. Health workers’ values and preferences regarding contraceptive methods globally: A systematic review. Contraception. 2022;111:61–70.
13. Thompson CM, Broecker J, Dade M. How long-acting reversible contraception knowledge, training, and provider concerns predict referrals and placement. Journal of the American Osteopathic Association. 2019;119(11):725–34.
14. Teklu AM, Paul’s Hospital S, Yimam H, Medhin G. Competency of Level-4 Health Extension Workers to provide Long Acting Reversible Contraceptives: A task shifting initiative in Ethiopia. 2019;1–12.
15. Tuya SW, Gatere R, Njuguna S. Continuous Professional Development in Long Acting Reversible Contraception for Nurses and its influence on Services provided to women at Mbagathi County Hospital in Nairobi , Kenya. 2023;11(2).
16. Sieverding M, Schatzkin E, Shen J, Liu J. Bias in contraceptive provision to young women among private health care providers in south west Nigeria. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2018 Mar 1;44(1):19–29.
17. Lindsay SF, Woodhams EJ, White KO, Drainoni ML, Johnson NL, Yinusa-Nyahkoon L. Understanding Barriers to Contraception Screening and Referral in Female Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2020 Feb;9(1):63–71.
18. Stokholm Bækgaard R, Gjærevold Damhaugh E, Mrema D, Rasch V, Khan K, Linde DS. Training of healthcare providers and use of long-acting reversible contraception in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021;100(4):619–28.
19. Wynne EE, Hofmeyr GJ. Provision of postpartum long-acting reversible contraception: A quality improvement intervention with pre-and post-intervention evaluation. S Afr J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022;28(1):26–9.
20. MacLachlan E, Agali BI, Maytan-Joneydi A, Chaibou S, Garba SA, Halidou IC, et al. Qualitative assessment of providers’ experiences with a segmentation counseling tool for family planning in Niger. Reprod Health. 2023;20(1):1–12.
21. Taft A, Watson CJ, McCarthy E, Black KI, Lucke J, McGeechan K, et al. Sustainable and effective methods to increase long-acting reversible contraception uptake from the ACCORd general practice trial. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2022;46(4):540–4.
22. Makins A, Hearing F, Taghinejadi N, Kiarie J, Kabra R, Arulkumaran SS, et al. The impact of cascade training—A FIGO and WHO Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research collaboration to improve access to quality family planning globally. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2024;164(1):75–85.
23. Durante JC, Sims J, Jarin J, Gold MA, Messiah SE, Francis JK. Long-Acting Reversible Contraception for Adolescents: A Review of Practices to Support Better Communication, Counseling, and Adherence. Adolesc Health Med Ther. 2023;Volume 14(May):97–114.
24. Holland AC, Shah B, Metcalf HN, Pridgen K. Preparing for intrauterine device consults and procedures. Women’s Healthcare: A Clinical Journal for NPs. 2020;8(6):37–43.
25. Viera Valencia LF, Garcia Giraldo D. 済無No Title No Title No Title. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 951–952. 2019;2:0–31.
26. Meekers D, Elkins A, Obozekhai V. Tools for patient-centred family planning counselling: A scoping review. J Glob Health [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Jul 13];14:4038. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC10846870/
27. Abrahams TL, Pather MK, Swartz S. Knowledge, beliefs and practices of nurses with longacting reversible contraception, Cape Town. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2023;15(1):1–8.
28. Thompson CM, Broecker J, Dade M. How long-acting reversible contraception knowledge, training, and provider concerns predict referrals and placement. Journal of the American Osteopathic Association. 2019;119(11):725–34.
29. Soin KS, Yeh PT, Gaffield ME, Ge C, Kennedy CE. Health workers’ values and preferences regarding contraceptive methods globally: A systematic review. Contraception. 2022;111:61–70.
30. Kariman N, Hashemi S, Ghanbari S, Pourhoseingholi M, Alimoradi Z, Fakari F. The effect of an educational intervention based on the theory of planned behavior on childbearing intentions in women: A quasi-experimental study. J Educ Health Promot [Internet]. 2020 Jan 1 [cited 2024 Jul 13];9(1). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32509904/
31. Mahmood H, Khan Z, Masood S. Effects of male literacy on family size: A cross sectional study conducted in Chakwal city. J Pak Med Assoc. 2016 Apr 1;66(4):399-403.

Most read articles by the same author(s)