PHARMACOVIGILANCE STUDY OF SIDE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH LEVONORGESTROL -ETHINYL ESTRADIOL AND DEPOTMEDROXY PROGESTERONE ACETATE

Main Article Content

Dr. Huma Dilshad
Dr. Rabia Ismail Yousuf
Dr. Harris Shoaib
Javeria Sheikh
Asra Mansoor
Ayesha Kiran
Saroush Kiran
Sahar Iqtidar
Sidra Sohail
Qurat-ul-ain Riaz

Keywords

Pharmacovigilance, Adverse effects, Levonorgestrol -Ethinyl estradiol, Depotmedroxy progesterone acetate

Abstract

Background: Levonorgestrol & Ethinyl estradiol (COCs) and Depotmedroxy progesterone acetate (Depo-Provera) are commonly prescribed contraceptives by family planning centers in Pakistan and compliance to these agents is reducing day by day due to associated side effects.


 Objective: Monitoring side effects associated with the use of hormone replacement therapy in contraception.


 Method: It was a population based retrospective study of 1149 cases, maintained on these contraceptives for minor side effects (nausea, vomiting, hair loss and weight gain) and were divided into, groups receiving Drug-I i.e. COCs (n=365; 45.9%) and  Drug-II Depo-Provera (n=431; 54.1%). The occurrence of side effects were correlated with Age I (19-35 years) and Age II (36-50 years), and Duration I (6months-1 year) and Duration-II (1-2 years).


 Results: Women receiving Drug-I (n=365) were more likely to show nausea than Drug-II, [OR= 1.26; 95% CI, 1.17-1.37]. The odd of vomiting of Drug-I was 1.83 times greater than Drug-II [95% CI, 1.62-2.10], vomiting was found more related with Age I, [OR=1.46; 95% CI, 1.100-1.942] and the risk of vomiting was high in Duration-I [OR= 3.32; 95% CI, 2.46-4.48]. Drug-I showed more hair loss than Drug-II, [OR=2.36; 95% CI, 2.27-3.49], and hair loss was found more associated with Age II [OR=1.932; 95% CI, 0.776-1.371], but its relation with duration and age was insignificant (p>0.05).The likelihood of weight gain was found more with Drug-II, Age I and Duration II at 95% CI with OR of 2.36, 2.88 and 1.431 (p<0.05) respectively.


 Conclusion: The most commonly observed side effects with COCs were nausea, vomiting and hair loss, whereas weight gain was found more associated with Depo-Provera.

Abstract 55 | PDF Downloads 15

References

1. Waller P. An introduction to pharmacovigilance. John Wiley & Sons; 2011.
2. Shoaib MH, Tazeen J, Merchant HA, Yousuf RI. Evaluation of drug release kinetics from ibuprofen matrix tablets using HPMC. Pak J Pharm Sci. 2006;19(2):119-24.
3. Khan Z, Muhammad K, Karatas Y, Bilen C, Khan FU, Khan FU. Pharmacovigilance and incidence of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized pediatric patients: a mini systematic review. Egyptian Pediatric Association Gazette. 2020 Dec;68:1-7.
4. Postlethwaite D, Trussell J, Zoolakis A, Shabear R, Petitti D. A comparison of contraceptive procurement pre-and post-benefit change. Contraception. 2007;76(5):360-5.
5. Ismael YM, Ahmed MA. Study of Women's Knowledge and Information about Family Planning at Al-Kansaa and Al-Salam Hospital In Mosul City. Mosul Journal of Nursing. 2021 Jul 4;9(2):154-66.
6. Rothschild CW, Richardson BA, Guthrie BL, Kithao P, Omurwa T, Mukabi J, Callegari LS, Lokken EL, John‐Stewart G, Unger JA, Kinuthia J. Contributions of side effects to contraceptive discontinuation and method switch among Kenyan women: a prospective cohort study. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2022 May;129(6):926-37.
7. Akhtar S, Ahmed H, Khan G. Knowledge and practice of family planning methods in women of childbearing age. Journal of Bashir Institute of Health Sciences. 2021 Dec 25;2(2):63-73.
8. Lopez LM, Grimes DA, Gallo MF, Schulz KF. Skin patch and vaginal ring versus combined oral contraceptives for contraception. The Cochrane Library. 2008.
9. Machado RB, Ushikusa TE, Monteiro IM, Guazzelli CA, Bella ZJ, Politano CA, Sakamoto LC. Different perceptions among women and their physicians regarding contraceptive counseling: results from the TANCO Survey in Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2020 Jun 22;42:255-65.
10. Frohwirth L, Mueller J, Anderson R, Williams P, Kochhar S, Castle SK, Kavanaugh ML. Understanding contraceptive failure: an analysis of qualitative narratives. Women's Reproductive Health. 2023 Apr 3;10(2):280-302.
11. Fleischer K, Van Vliet H, Rosendaal F, Rosing J, Tchaikovski S, Helmerhorst F. Effects of the contraceptive patch, the vaginal ring and an oral contraceptive on APC resistance and SHBG: a cross-over study. Thrombosis research. 2009;123(3):429-35.
12. www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/family_planning/9789290215080/en/indx. Accessed 10th November 2015.
13. Lopez LM, Tolley EE, Grimes DA, Chen-Mok M. Theory-based strategies for improving contraceptive use: a systematic review. Contraception. 2009;79(6):411-7.
14. Schober P, Vetter TR. Logistic regression in medical research. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2021 Feb 1;132(2):365-6.
15. Kauppila M, Backman JT, Niemi M, Lapatto-Reiniluoto O. Incidence, preventability, and causality of adverse drug reactions at a university hospital emergency department. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2021 Apr;77:643-50.
16. Zazzara MB, Palmer K, Vetrano DL, Carfì A, Graziano O. Adverse drug reactions in older adults: a narrative review of the literature. European geriatric medicine. 2021 Jun;12:463-73.
17. Fitchett JR. Global Access Diagnostics: Transforming the Path for Equitable Access to Life Science innovations for Epidemics (Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University).
18. Ezzatvar Y, Izquierdo M, Nunez J, Calatayud J, Ramirez-Velez R, Garcia-Hermoso A. Cardiorespiratory fitness measured with cardiopulmonary exercise testing and mortality in patients with cardiovascular disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of sport and health science. 2021 Dec 1;10(6):609-19.
19. Kuemmerle A, Dodoo A, Olsson S, Van Erps J, Burri C, Lalvani PS. Assessment of global reporting of adverse drug reactions for anti-malarials, including artemisinin-based combination therapy, to the WHO Programme for International Drug Monitoring. Malar J. 2011;10:57.
20. Anastassakis K. Hormonal Contraceptives. InAndrogenetic Alopecia From A to Z: Vol. 2 Drugs, Herbs, Nutrition and Supplements 2022 Oct 27 (pp. 187-192). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
21. Dal'Ava N, Bahamondes L, Bahamondes MV, Bottura BF, Monteiro I. Body weight and body composition of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate users. Contraception. 2014;90(2):182-7.
22. Beksinska ME, Smit JA, Kleinschmidt I, Milford C, Farley TM. Prospective study of weight change in new adolescent users of DMPA, NET-EN, COCs, nonusers and discontinuers of hormonal contraception. Contraception. 2010;81(1):30-4.
23. Häni D, Imthurn B, Merki-Feld G. [Weight gain due to hormonal contraception: myth or truth?]. Gynakologisch-geburtshilfliche Rundschau. 2008;49(2):87-93.
24. Beksinska ME, Kleinschmidt I, Smit JA, Farley TM, Rees HV. Bone mineral density in young women aged 19–24 after 4–5 years of exclusive and mixed use of hormonal contraception. Contraception. 2009;80(2):128-32.
25. Berenson AB, van den Berg P, Williams KJ, Rahman M. Effect of injectable and oral contraceptives on glucose and insulin levels. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2011;117(1):41.
26. Delvaux T, Jespers V, Benova L, van de Wijgert J. Acceptability and satisfaction of contraceptive vaginal rings in clinical studies: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. Frontiers in global women's health. 2021 Dec 14; 2:799963.