THE IMPACT OF ROTARY INSTRUMENTATION SYSTEMS ON CANAL SHAPING AND CLEANING EFFICIENCY
Main Article Content
Keywords
rotary instruments, canal shaping, endodontics, cleaning efficiency
Abstract
Rotary instrumentation systems have revolutionized endodontic therapy by enhancing canal shaping and cleaning efficiency, significantly outperforming traditional hand files. These systems, primarily fabricated from nickel-titanium, offer marked improvements in speed, precision, and the maintenance of canal integrity during procedures. Factors such as material composition, the complexity of root canal anatomy, and operational parameters critically influence their effectiveness. Innovations in nickel-titanium alloy processing and file design have increased the flexibility and fatigue resistance of these instruments, facilitating safer and more effective navigation through complex canal geometries. Comparative studies consistently demonstrate that rotary systems achieve more uniform and precise canal shapes, effectively reducing procedural errors such as ledging, zipping, or canal transportation. The integration of advanced rotary systems with enhanced irrigation techniques also leads to superior debris removal, which is vital for successful infection control and root canal disinfection. This synergy between mechanical instrumentation and chemical cleaning significantly lowers the risk of treatment failures due to residual bacterial contamination. Despite the advantages, the success of rotary instrumentation requires careful consideration of the specific clinical scenario and the anatomical challenges presented by each patient's canal system. The correct adjustment of operational settings, such as the rotational speed and torque, and the clinician's proficiency with these tools are paramount in optimizing treatment outcomes. Continuous professional development and hands-on experience are essential for endodontists to fully leverage the potential of these advanced systems in clinical practice. As endodontic technology continues to evolve, staying abreast of the latest developments and incorporating them into routine practice will be crucial for maintaining high standards of care in endodontics.
References
2. Siqueira JF, Rôças IN, Ricucci D. Biofilms in endodontic infection. Endodontic Topics. 2010 Mar;22(1):33-49.
3. Yared G. Canal preparation using only one Ni-Ti rotary instrument: preliminary observations. Int Endod J. 2008;41(4):339-44.
4. Bürklein S, Hinschitza K, Dammaschke T, Schäfer E. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single‐file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper. International endodontic journal. 2012 May;45(5):449-61.
5. Peters OA, Laib A, Gohring TN, Barbakow F. Changes in root canal geometry after preparation assessed by high-resolution computed tomography. J Endod. 2001;27(1):1-6
6. Peng B, Shen Y, Cheung GS, Xia TJ. Defects in ProTaper S1 instruments after clinical use: longitudinal examination. International Endodontic Journal. 2005 Aug;38(8):550-7.
7. Haapasalo M, Shen Y, Qian W, Gao Y. Irrigation in endodontics. Dental Clinics. 2010 Apr 1;54(2):291-312.
8. Parashos P, Messer HH. Rotary NiTi instrument fracture and its consequences. Journal of endodontics. 2006 Nov 1;32(11):1031-43.
9. Sattapan B, Nervo GJ, Palamara JE, Messer HH. Defects in rotary nickel-titanium files after clinical use. Journal of endodontics. 2000 Mar 1;26(3):161-5.
10. Gambarini G. Rationale for the use of low-torque endodontic motors in root canal instrumentation. Endod Dent Traumatol. 2000;16(3):95-100.
11. Yared GM, Dagher FE, Machtou P. Influence of rotational speed, torque and operator proficiency on failure of Greater Taper files. Int Endod J. 2002;35(1):7-12.
12. Pruett JP, Clement DJ, Carnes DL Jr. Cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod. 1997;23(2):77-85.
13. Berutti E, Chiandussi G, Gaviglio I, Ibba A. Comparative analysis of torsional and bending stresses in two mathematical models of nickel-titanium rotary instruments: ProTaper versus ProFile. J Endod. 2003;29(1):15-19.
14. Hülsmann M, Peters OA, Dummer PMH. Mechanical preparation of root canals: shaping goals, techniques and means. Endod Topics. 2005;10(1):30-76.
15. Rödig T, Bozkurt M, Konietschke F, Hülsmann M. Comparison of the effectiveness of various irrigation techniques in debriding curved root canals. J Endod. 2010;36(5):860-64
16. Alapati SB, Brantley WA, Iijima M, Clark WA, Kovarik L, Buie C, Liu J, Ben Johnson W. Metallurgical characterization of a new nickel-titanium wire for rotary endodontic instruments. J Endod. 2009;35(11):1589-93.
17. Shen Y, Zhou HM, Zheng YF, Peng B, Haapasalo M. Current challenges and concepts of the thermomechanical treatment of nickel-titanium instruments. J Endod. 2013;39(2):163-72.
18. Gambarini G, Grande NM, Plotino G, Somma F, Garala M, De Luca M. Fatigue resistance of engine-driven rotary nickel-titanium instruments produced by new manufacturing methods. J Endod. 2008;34(8):1003-05.
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All articles published in JPTCP are licensed under Copyright Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Mousa Ibrahim Bakawwasah
Muhayil Dental Center, Muhayil General Hospital, Muhayil Aseer, Saudi Arabia
Ali Hussain Alsaif
Department of Endodontics, Eastern 1st Health Cluster, Ministry of Health, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
Abdullah Khalaf Saleh Alghamdi
Dental Department, Prince Mishari bin Saud Hospital in Baljurashi, Albaha, Saudi Arabia
Ahmed Ibrahim Qadri
Muhayil Dental Center, Muhayil General Hospital, Muhayil Aseer, Saudi Arabia
Mohammed Ahmad Alabdullah
Aljafer Primary Healthcare, Ministry of Health, Al-Ahsaa, Saudi Arabia