Nurse-run preanaesthesia assessment clinics: an initiative towards improving the quality of perioperative care at the Hospital

Main Article Content

Zakia Mubarak Said Al Tohefan, Hamdeh Saleh Ali Al Yami, Sohylah Abdullah Hefzullah Al Hadad, Bedoor Saeed Dafer Al Demshiq, Hamad Qassas Hamad Alyami, Yahya Mohammed Hussin Al Abbas

Keywords

anesthesia, audit and feedback, nurses, patient-centered care

Abstract

Implementing nurse-led preoperative assessments has become a standard practice in ambulatory surgery settings. However, in the Middle East, this practice is relatively new and requires careful planning and preparation. This audit aims to evaluate the feasibility and quality of preoperative assessments conducted by specially trained nurses, assess patient and nurse satisfaction, and evaluate overall perioperative quality of recovery.


Methods: Nurses underwent selection and training through an accredited program. Following this, a 3-month implementation period allowed nurses to gain experience in conducting preoperative assessments. A four-step audit was then conducted to evaluate the quality of preassessment, patient satisfaction, quality of recovery, and any adverse events. Additionally, nurses' satisfaction with their advanced role was monitored.


Results: The quality of preoperative assessments by specially trained nurses showed high compliance, with 95% adherence to accepted standards. Patient satisfaction surveys, involving 152 patients, indicated that all patients were either highly satisfied or satisfied with the nurse-led service. Nurses expressed high levels of satisfaction and felt valued in their roles. Postoperative follow-up via telephone calls with ambulatory care patients revealed high levels of satisfaction. No major or minor adverse events were reported.


Conclusion: Specially trained nurses demonstrated high-quality preoperative assessments without adverse events, and both patient and staff satisfaction levels were very high. Future research will focus on strategies to reduce surgery cancellation rates, evaluate the cost-effectiveness of this approach, and provide specialized training for nurses conducting pediatric preoperative assessments. This model of care may pave the way for additional nurse-led care models in the Middle East.

Abstract 113 | PDF Downloads 69

References

1. Hines S, Munday J, Kynoch K. Effectiveness of nurse-led preoperative assessment services for elective surgery: a systematic review update. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep 2015;13:279–317. [DOI: 10.11124/01938924-201513060-00016]
2. Sau-Man Conny C, Wan-Yim I. The effectiveness of nurse-led preoperative assessment clinics for patients receiving elective orthopaedic surgery: a systematic review. J Perianesth Nurs 2016;31:465–74. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jopan.2014.08.147]
3. Malkin KF. Patients' perceptions of a pre-admission clinic. J Nurs Manag 2000;8:107–13. [DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2834.2000.00163.x]
4. Sahraoui A, Elarref M. Bed crisis and elective surgery late cancellations: an approach using the theory of constraints. Qatar Med J 2014;2014:1–11. [DOI: 10.5339/qmj.2014.1]
5. Hibbert D, Aboshaiqah AE, Sienko KA, et al.. Advancing nursing practice: the emergence of the role of advanced practice nurse in Saudi Arabia. Ann Saudi Med 2017;37:72–8. [DOI: 10.5144/0256-4947.2017.72]
6. Reed M, Wright S, Armitage F. Nurse-led general surgical pre-operative assessment clinic. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1997;42:310–3.
7. Whiteley M. The role of the nurse in the pre-admission clinic. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1998;80:192.
8. Helkin A, Jain SV, Gruessner A, et al.. Impact of ASA score misclassification on NSQIP predicted mortality: a retrospective analysis. Perioper Med 2017;6:23. [DOI: 10.1186/s13741-017-0076-1]
9. Nicholson A, Coldwell CH, Lewis SR, et al.. Nurse-Led versus doctor-led preoperative assessment for elective surgical patients requiring regional or general anaesthesia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013:Cd010160. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010160.pub2]
10. Jones A, Penfold P, Bailey M, et al.. Pre-admission clerking of urology patients by nurses. Prof Nurse 2000;15:261–6.
11. Shakeel M, Newton JR, Clark D, et al.. Patients' satisfaction with the nurse-led aural care clinic. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2008;20:81–3.
12. Arbabi H, Johnson J, Forgrave D. The effect of preceptorship on nurses’ training and preparation with implications for Qatar: A literature review. J Nurs Educ Pract 2018;8:44–50. [DOI: 10.5430/jnep.v8n7p44]
13. Appavu ST, Al-Shekaili SM, Al-Sharif AM, et al.. The burden of surgical cancellations and No-Shows: quality management study from a large regional hospital in Oman. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J 2016;16:e298–302. [DOI: 10.18295/squmj.2016.16.03.006]
14. Choi SL, Goh CF, Adam MBH, et al.. Transformational leadership, empowerment, and job satisfaction: the mediating role of employee empowerment. Hum Resour Health 2016;14:73. [DOI: 10.1186/s12960-016-0171-2]
15. Passarelli M, Landi GC, Cariola A, et al.. Open innovation in the new context of proof of concepts: evidence from Italy. EJIM 2021;24:735–55. [DOI: 10.1108/EJIM-02-2020-0052]
16. Edward GM, Razzaq S, de Roode A, et al.. Patient flow in the preoperative assessment clinic. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2008;25:280–6. [DOI: 10.1017/S0265021507003122]
17. Kinley H, Czoski-Murray C, George S, et al.. Extended scope of nursing practice: a multicentre randomised controlled trial of appropriately trained nurses and pre-registration house officers in pre-operative assessment in elective general surgery. Health Technol Assess 2001;5:1–87. [DOI: 10.3310/hta5200]