Medication communication between nurses and patients during nursing handovers on medical wards: A critical ethnographic study
Main Article Content
Keywords
.
Abstract
Effective communication is crucial for safe medication management, particularly during handover processes where nurses exchange critical patient information. While previous studies have explored handover practices generally, little attention has been given to the specific dynamics of medication communication and power relations among nurses and patients during handover.
Objectives: This study aims to investigate the dominant and submissive communication styles and power dynamics surrounding medication communication during handover among healthcare professionals and patients.
Design: Employing a critical ethnographic approach, this research delves into the social and power dynamics inherent in medication communication during handover.
Settings: The study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital
Participants: All registered nurses working in the hospital's medical wards during the study period were eligible participants. Patients who could actively engage in discussions about their medication management were also included. A total of 60 nurses and 20 patients provided written consent and participated in the study.
Methods: The research utilized participant observations, field interviews, video recordings, and reflexive focus groups to capture the nuances of medication communication during handover. Data analysis was guided by a critical discourse analytic framework.
Results: The study revealed that nurse-led handovers predominantly emphasized organizational and biomedical discourses, often neglecting in-depth discussions on medication effectiveness. Patient involvement during bedside handovers promoted a collaborative approach to medication communication, although nurses exercised discretion in discussing sensitive information away from the bedside. Communication breakdowns were observed during patient transfers between wards due to inadequate information exchange.
Conclusions: The findings suggest a need for a shift in organizational control of handover practices to empower bedside nurses in medication communication. Providing designated meeting spaces and encouraging open communication during handovers can enhance the effectiveness of medication information exchange and improve patient safety.
References
2. Bail, K., Cook, R., Gardner, A., Grealish, L. (2009). Writing ourselves into a web of obedience: a nursing policy analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46(11), 1457–1466.
3. Bangerter, A., Mayor, E., Doehler, S.P. (2011). Reported speech in conversational storytelling during nursing shift handover meetings. Discourse Processes, 48(3), 183–214.
4. Chaboyer, W., McMurray, A., Wallis, M. (2010). Bedside nursing handover: a case study. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 16(1), 27–34.
5. Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. MA Polity Press.
6. Farnell, S., Dawson, D. (2006). ‘It’s not like the wards’. Experiences of nurses new to critical care: a qualitative study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 43(3), 319–331.
7. Hagler, D.A., Brem, S.K. (2008). Reaching agreement: the structure & pragmatics of critical care nurses’ informal argument. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(3), 403–424.
8. Hammersley, M. (1992). What’s Wrong with Ethnography? Methodological Explorations. Routledge.
9. Hutchby, I., Wooffitt, R. (1998). Conversation Analysis: Principles, Practices, and Applications. Polity Press.
10. Lally, S. (1999). An investigation into the functions of nurses’ communication at the inter-shift handover. Journal of Nursing Management, 7(1), 29–36.
11. Manias, E., Aitken, R., Dunning, T. (2005). Graduate nurses’ communication with health professionals when managing patients’ medications. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 14(3), 354–362.
12. Manias, E., Street, A. (2000). The handover: uncovering the hidden practices of nurses. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, 16(6), 373–383.
13. Matic, J., Davidson, P.M., Salamonson, Y. (2011). Review: bringing patient safety to the forefront through structured computerisation during clinical handover. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 20(1-2), 184–189.
14. McMurray, A., Chaboyer, W., Wallis, M., Fetherston, C. (2010). Implementing bedside handover: strategies for change management. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 19(17-18), 2580–2589.
15. Parker, J. (1996). Handovers in a changing health care climate. Australian Nursing Journal, 4(5), 22–26.
16. Payne, S., Hardey, M., Coleman, P. (2000). Interactions between nurses during handovers in elderly care. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32(2), 277–285.
17. Polit, D.F., Beck, C.T. (2006). Essentials of Nursing Research: Methods, Appraisal, and Utilization. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
18. Reason, J. (2004). Beyond the organisational accident: the need for error wisdom on the frontline. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 13(Suppl. 2), ii28–ii33.
19. Spain, D. (1992). Gendered Spaces. University of North Carolina Press.
20. Strange, F. (1996). Handover: an ethnographic study of ritual in nursing practice. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, 12(2), 106–112.
21. Street, A. (1992). Inside Nursing: A Critical Ethnography of Clinical Nursing Practice. University of New York Press.
22. Street, M., Eustace, P., Livingston, P.M., Craike, M.J., Kent, B., Patterson, D. (2011). Communication at the bedside to enhance patient care: a survey of nurses’ experience and perspective of handover. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 17(2), 133–140.
23. Thomas, J. (1993). Doing Critical Ethnography. Sage Publications.
24. Welsh, C.A., Flanagan, M.E., Ebright, P. (2010). Barriers and facilitators to nursing handoffs: recommendations for redesign. Nursing Outlook, 58(3), 148–154.
25. Wiltshire, J., Parker, J. (1996). Containing abjection in nursing: the end of shift handover as a site of containment. Nursing Inquiry, 3(1), 23–29.
