A PRACTICAL GUIDE TO UNDERTAKING SCOPING REVIEWS FOR PHARMACY CLINICIANS, RESEARCHERS, AND POLICYMAKERS
Main Article Content
Keywords
Evidence synthesis, mapping, methodology, scoping reviews
Abstract
Scoping reviews are a valuable evidence synthesis methodology. They can be used to map the evidence related to any topic to allow examination of practice, methods, policy, and where (and how) future research could be undertaken. As such, they are a useful form of evidence synthesis for pharmacy clinicians, researchers and policy makers to review a broad range of evidence sources.
References
1. Arksey, H. and L. O'Malley, Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework.
International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 2005. 8(1): p. 19-32.
2. Levac, D., H. Colquhoun, and K.K. O'Brien, Scoping studies: advancing the methodology.
Implementation Science, 2010. 5(1): p. 69.
3. MDJ, P., et al., Chapter 11: Scoping Reviews (2020 version), in JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis, A. E and M. Z, Editors. 2020, JBI: Adelaide.
4. MDJ, P., et al., Scoping Reviews (2020 version), in JBI Reviewer's Manual, A. E and M. Z, Editors. 2020, JBI.
5. Peters, M.D., et al., Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evidence Implementation, 2021. 19(1): p. 3-10.
6. Khalil, H., et al., Conducting high quality scoping reviews-challenges and solutions. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2021. 130: p. 156-160.
7. Khalil, H., et al., An evidence-based approach to scoping reviews. Worldviews on Evidence- Based Nursing, 2016. 13(2): p. 118-123.
8. Peters, M.D.J., Managing and Coding References for Systematic Reviews and Scoping Reviews in EndNote. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 2017. 36(1): p. 19-31.
9. Khalil, H., et al., Evaluation of the JBI scoping reviews methodology by current users. JBI Evidence Implementation, 2020. 18(1): p. 95-100.
10. Davies, E.L., et al., Needs of individuals recovering from a first episode of mental illness: A scoping review. International journal of mental health nursing, 2018. 27(5): p. 1326-1343.
11. Tricco, A.C., et al., A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2016. 16(1): p. 15.
12. Khalil, H. and C. Huang, Adverse drug reactions in primary care: a scoping review. BMC health services research, 2020. 20(1): p. 1-13.
13. Khalil, H. and M. Kirschbaum, Adverse drug reactions in primary care: a scoping review protocol. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 2018. 16(3): p. 615-621.
14. Hoppe, D., E. Ristevski, and H. Khalil, The attitudes and practice strategies of community pharmacists towards drug misuse management: A scoping review. Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics, 2020. 45(3): p. 430-452.
15. Khalil, H., M. Shahid, and L. Roughead, Medication safety programs in primary care: a scoping review. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 2017. 15(10): p. 2512-2526.
16. Munn, Z., et al., Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2018. 18(1): p. 143.
17. Munn, Z., et al., What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2018. 18(1): p. 5.
18. Walther, F., D. Kuester, and J. Schmitt, Impact of Complex Quality-Interventions on Patient Outcome: A Systematic Overview of Systematic Reviews. Inquiry. 56: p. 46958019884182.
19. Peters, M.D., et al., Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI evidence synthesis, 2020. 18(10): p. 2119-2126.
20. Jordan, Z., et al., Redeveloping the JBI model of evidence based healthcare. JBI Evidence Implementation, 2018. 16(4): p. 227-241.
21. Pollock, D., et al., Undertaking a scoping review: A practical guide for nursing and midwifery students, clinicians, researchers, and academics. Journal of advanced nursing, 2021. 77(4): p. 2102-2113.
22. Pham, M.T., et al., A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Res Synth Methods, 2014. 5(4): p. 371-85.
23. McMillan, S.S., et al., Pharmacy participation in dental and oral health care: a scoping review protocol. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 2021. 19(7): p. 1651-1658.
24. Buckingham, P., et al., Scoping review of pharmacy-based initiatives for preventing unintended pregnancy: protocol. BMJ open, 2020. 10(1): p. e033002.
25. Aromataris, E. and D. Riitano, Constructing a search strategy and searching for evidence. A guide to the literature search for a systematic review. Am J Nurs, 2014. 114(5): p. 49-56.
26. Munn, Z., et al., The development of software to support multiple systematic review types: the Joanna Briggs Institute System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information (JBI SUMARI). Int J Evid Based Healthc, 2019. 17(1): p. 36-43.
27. Mirzaei, A., S.R. Carter, and C.R. Schneider, Marketing activity in the community pharmacy sector–a scoping review. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 2018. 14(2): p. 127-137.
28. Alhusein, N. and M.C. Watson, Quality indicators and community pharmacy services: a scoping review. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 2019. 27(6): p. 490-500.
29. Moher, D., et al., PRISMA statement. Epidemiology, 2011. 22(1): p. 128.
30. Tricco, A.C., et al., PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Annals of internal medicine, 2018. 169(7): p. 467.
31. Cottrell, E., et al., Defining the benefits and challenges of stakeholder engagement in systematic reviews. Comparative Effectiveness Research, 2015. 5: p. 13-19.
32. Bakaki, P.M., et al., A transdisciplinary team approach to scoping reviews: the case of pediatric polypharmacy. BMC medical research methodology, 2018. 18(1): p. 1-9.
International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 2005. 8(1): p. 19-32.
2. Levac, D., H. Colquhoun, and K.K. O'Brien, Scoping studies: advancing the methodology.
Implementation Science, 2010. 5(1): p. 69.
3. MDJ, P., et al., Chapter 11: Scoping Reviews (2020 version), in JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis, A. E and M. Z, Editors. 2020, JBI: Adelaide.
4. MDJ, P., et al., Scoping Reviews (2020 version), in JBI Reviewer's Manual, A. E and M. Z, Editors. 2020, JBI.
5. Peters, M.D., et al., Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evidence Implementation, 2021. 19(1): p. 3-10.
6. Khalil, H., et al., Conducting high quality scoping reviews-challenges and solutions. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2021. 130: p. 156-160.
7. Khalil, H., et al., An evidence-based approach to scoping reviews. Worldviews on Evidence- Based Nursing, 2016. 13(2): p. 118-123.
8. Peters, M.D.J., Managing and Coding References for Systematic Reviews and Scoping Reviews in EndNote. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 2017. 36(1): p. 19-31.
9. Khalil, H., et al., Evaluation of the JBI scoping reviews methodology by current users. JBI Evidence Implementation, 2020. 18(1): p. 95-100.
10. Davies, E.L., et al., Needs of individuals recovering from a first episode of mental illness: A scoping review. International journal of mental health nursing, 2018. 27(5): p. 1326-1343.
11. Tricco, A.C., et al., A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2016. 16(1): p. 15.
12. Khalil, H. and C. Huang, Adverse drug reactions in primary care: a scoping review. BMC health services research, 2020. 20(1): p. 1-13.
13. Khalil, H. and M. Kirschbaum, Adverse drug reactions in primary care: a scoping review protocol. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 2018. 16(3): p. 615-621.
14. Hoppe, D., E. Ristevski, and H. Khalil, The attitudes and practice strategies of community pharmacists towards drug misuse management: A scoping review. Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics, 2020. 45(3): p. 430-452.
15. Khalil, H., M. Shahid, and L. Roughead, Medication safety programs in primary care: a scoping review. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 2017. 15(10): p. 2512-2526.
16. Munn, Z., et al., Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2018. 18(1): p. 143.
17. Munn, Z., et al., What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2018. 18(1): p. 5.
18. Walther, F., D. Kuester, and J. Schmitt, Impact of Complex Quality-Interventions on Patient Outcome: A Systematic Overview of Systematic Reviews. Inquiry. 56: p. 46958019884182.
19. Peters, M.D., et al., Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI evidence synthesis, 2020. 18(10): p. 2119-2126.
20. Jordan, Z., et al., Redeveloping the JBI model of evidence based healthcare. JBI Evidence Implementation, 2018. 16(4): p. 227-241.
21. Pollock, D., et al., Undertaking a scoping review: A practical guide for nursing and midwifery students, clinicians, researchers, and academics. Journal of advanced nursing, 2021. 77(4): p. 2102-2113.
22. Pham, M.T., et al., A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Res Synth Methods, 2014. 5(4): p. 371-85.
23. McMillan, S.S., et al., Pharmacy participation in dental and oral health care: a scoping review protocol. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 2021. 19(7): p. 1651-1658.
24. Buckingham, P., et al., Scoping review of pharmacy-based initiatives for preventing unintended pregnancy: protocol. BMJ open, 2020. 10(1): p. e033002.
25. Aromataris, E. and D. Riitano, Constructing a search strategy and searching for evidence. A guide to the literature search for a systematic review. Am J Nurs, 2014. 114(5): p. 49-56.
26. Munn, Z., et al., The development of software to support multiple systematic review types: the Joanna Briggs Institute System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information (JBI SUMARI). Int J Evid Based Healthc, 2019. 17(1): p. 36-43.
27. Mirzaei, A., S.R. Carter, and C.R. Schneider, Marketing activity in the community pharmacy sector–a scoping review. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 2018. 14(2): p. 127-137.
28. Alhusein, N. and M.C. Watson, Quality indicators and community pharmacy services: a scoping review. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 2019. 27(6): p. 490-500.
29. Moher, D., et al., PRISMA statement. Epidemiology, 2011. 22(1): p. 128.
30. Tricco, A.C., et al., PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Annals of internal medicine, 2018. 169(7): p. 467.
31. Cottrell, E., et al., Defining the benefits and challenges of stakeholder engagement in systematic reviews. Comparative Effectiveness Research, 2015. 5: p. 13-19.
32. Bakaki, P.M., et al., A transdisciplinary team approach to scoping reviews: the case of pediatric polypharmacy. BMC medical research methodology, 2018. 18(1): p. 1-9.
Article Sidebar
Published
Aug 24, 2022
Article Details
How to Cite
Fahda Dakheel Baker Al enazi, Hanan Saleh Almasmary, Sara Basheer Shelash AlEnzy, Eman Mohammad Omar Alshammari, Safiyah Mohammad Saeed Alghamdi, Maha Abdulrahman Ibrahim alowais, Mashail Kaid Aloudah, Amal muhammad alasmari. (2022). A PRACTICAL GUIDE TO UNDERTAKING SCOPING REVIEWS FOR PHARMACY CLINICIANS, RESEARCHERS, AND POLICYMAKERS. Journal of Population Therapeutics and Clinical Pharmacology, 29(02), 330–337. https://doi.org/10.53555/jptcp.v29i02.5442
Section
Articles
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All articles published in JPTCP are licensed under Copyright Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.