Assessment of Radiological Practices: Knowledge of Irradiation, Medical Imaging Prescriptions, and Clinical Imaging Referral Guidelines among Physicians

Main Article Content

Alhanouf Raed Alhussinan, Hind Faisal Almutairi, Ahlam Mohammed ALANAZI, Salha Aowad Alanazi, Khalid Zaben Oudah Alanazi, Faihan Marzouq Faihan Alotaibi, Majed Moqed Mobereek Alwasari, Sami Abdulrahman Fardis Alqarni

Keywords

.

Abstract

Clinical imaging guidelines (CIGs) serve as valuable tools for improving the justification of imaging procedures among physicians.


Objective: This study aims to assess physicians' knowledge regarding irradiation, their self-perception of imaging prescriptions, and the utilization of CIGs.


Materials and Methods: A questionnaire comprising 21 items was self-administered to 155 referring physicians working in seven university-affiliated hospitals . The questionnaire covered aspects such as imaging referral practices, the use and need for CIGs, knowledge of radiation doses for specific radiologic procedures, and awareness of the harmful effects of radiation. Scores were assigned to each question to gauge participants' knowledge.


Results: Out of 180 administered questionnaires, 155 were completed (86.1% response rate). Participants included 90 (58%) females, 63 (40.64%) specialists, 53 (34.20%) residents/interns, and 39 (25.16%) general practitioners, with an average professional experience of 7.4 years (ranging from 1 to 25 years). The mean knowledge score was 11.5 out of 59, with no significant influence of sex, years of experience, or professional category. Users of CIGs scored higher than non-users (means 14.2 versus 10.6; p < 0.01). Most physicians (80%) underestimated radiation doses for routine imaging exams. About half of the participants were aware of CIGs, with half of them utilizing these guidelines. Criteria such as "impact on diagnosis" and "impact on treatment decision" were commonly used for justifying imaging requests, while unjustified requests often stemmed from "patient expectation or will" or "research motivations." The majority (96%) of interviewees believed that the availability of national CIGs would improve justification practices.


Conclusion: The study highlights a lack of awareness among physicians regarding radiation doses for routine imaging procedures. While some physicians are familiar with CIGs, there is a general consensus on the potential benefits of national CIGs in improving the justification of imaging procedures. Continuous training on radiation protection and the implementation of national CIGs are recommended to enhance practices in this area.

Abstract 93 | pdf Downloads 11

References

1. Ujah FO, Akaagerger NB, Agba EH, Iortile JT. A comparative study of patients' radiation levels with standard diagnostic reference levels in Federal Medical Center and Bishop Murray Hospitals in Makurdi. Archives of Applied Science Research. 2012;4(2):800–802.
2. United Nations. Sources and effects of ionizing radiation: United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation: UNSCEAR 2008 Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes. New York, NY, USA: United Nations; 2010.
3. ACR Appropriateness Criteria®. American College of Radiology, July 2014.
4. European Commission. Radiation Protection N° 178: Referral Guidelines for Medical Imaging Availability and Use in the European Union. 2014. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/178.pdf
5. Société Française de Radiologie. Guide du bon Usage des Examens d’Imagerie Médicale. Paris, France: Editions SFR; 2005. Available from: http://gbu.radiologie.fr/
6. Moifo B, Ndeh Kamgnie M, Ninying Fuh F, Zeh OF. Pertinence des indications d’examens d’imagerie médicale à Yaoundé—Cameroun. Health Sciences and Diseases. 2013;14(4):1–8.
7. Moifo B, Ndeh KM, Fuh FN, et al. Assessment of the completeness of medical imaging request forms in a sub-Saharan African setting. Medecine et Sante Tropicales. 2014;24(4):392–396. doi: 10.1684/mst.2014.0382.
8. Ongolo-Zogo P, Nguehouo MB, Yomi J, Nko'o Amven S. Knowledge in radiation protection: a survey of professionals in medical imaging, radiation therapy and nuclear medicine units in Yaounde. Radioprotection. 2013;48(1):39–49. doi: 10.1051/radiopro/2012017.
9. Ongolo-Zogo P, Mpeke Mokubangele C, Moifo B, Gonsu Fotsin J. Evaluating pediatric patient dose during computed tomography in two university teaching hospitals in Yaoundé—Cameroun. Radioprotection. 2012;47(4):533–542. doi: 10.1051/radiopro/2012016.
10. Moifo B, Edzimbi AL, Tebere H, et al. Referring physicians’ knowledge on justification of medical exposure in diagnostic imaging in a sub-saharan African country, Cameroon. Open Journal of Radiology. 2014;4(1):60–68. doi: 10.4236/ojrad.2014.41008.
11. Ghazikhanlou Sani K, Jafari M, Mohammadi M, Mojiri M, Rahimi A. Iranian physicians' knowledge about radiation dose received by patients in diagnostic radiology. Iranian Journal of Radiation Research. 2009;6(4):207–211.
12. Borgen L, Stranden E. Radiation knowledge and perception of referral practice among radiologists and radiographers compared with referring clinicians. Insights into Imaging. 2014;5(5):635–640. doi: 10.1007/s13244-014-0348-y.
13. Ahidjo A, Garba I, Mustapha Z, Abubakar AM. Referring doctors' knowledge about radiation doses in patients undergoing common radiological examinations. Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences. 2012;3(4):222–225.
14. Thomas KE, Parnell-Parmley JE, Haidar S, et al. Assessment of radiation dose awareness among pediatricians. Pediatric Radiology. 2006;36(8):823–832. doi: 10.1007/s00247-006-0170-x.
15. Shiralkar S, Rennie A, Snow M, Galland RB, Lewis MH, Gower-Thomas K. Doctors' knowledge of radiation exposure: questionnaire study. British Medical Journal. 2003;327(7411):371–372. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7411.371.
16. Quinn AD, Taylor CG, Sabharwal T, Sikdar T. Radiation protection awareness in non-radiologists. British Journal of Radiology. 1997;70:102–106. doi: 10.1259/bjr.70.829.9059306.
17. Lee CI, Haims AH, Monico EP, Brink JA, Forman HP. Diagnostic CT scans: assessment of patient, physician, and radiologist awareness of radiation dose and possible risks. Radiology. 2004;231(2):393–398. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2312030767.
18. Jacob K, Vivian G, Steel JR. X-ray dose training: are we exposed to enough? Clinical Radiology. 2004;59(10):928–934. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2004.04.020.
19. Arslanoglu A, Bilgin S, Kubal Z, et al. Doctors’ and intern doctors’ knowledge about patients' ionizing radiation exposure doses during common radiological examinations. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology. 2007;13(2):53–55.
20. Singh P, Aggarwal S, Kapoor AMS, Kaur R, Kaur A. A prospective study assessing clinicians' attitude and knowledge on radiation exposure to patients during radiological investigations. Journal of Natural Science, Biology and Medicine. 2015;6(2):398–401. doi: 10.4103/0976-9668.160019.
21. Prabhat M, Sudhakar S, Kumar B, Ramaraju P. Attitude and perception (KAP) of dental undergraduates interns on radiographic protection: a questionnaire-based cross-sectional study. Journal of Advanced Oral Research. 2011;2:45–50.
22. Brenner DJ, Hricak H. Radiation exposure from medical imaging: time to regulate? Journal of the American Medical Association. 2010;304(2):208–209. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.973.
23. Soye JA, Paterson A. A survey of awareness of radiation dose among health professionals in Northern Ireland. British Journal of Radiology. 2008;81(969):725–729. doi: 10.1259/bjr/94101717.
24. Rice HE, Frush DP, Harker MJ, Farmer D, Waldhausen JH. Peer assessment of pediatric surgeons for potential risks of radiation exposure from computed tomography scans. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 2007;42(7):1157–1164. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.02.007.
25. Renston JP, Connors AF Jr, Dimarco AF. Survey of physicians' attitudes about risks and benefits of chest computed tomography. Southern Medical Journal. 1996;89(11):1067–1073. doi: 10.1097/00007611-199611000-00008.
26. Heyer CM, Peters S, Lemburg S. Awareness of radiation exposure of thoracic CT scans and conventional radiographs: what do non-radiologists know? Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2007;179(3):261–267.
27. Finestone A, Schlesinger T, Amir H, Richter E, Milgrom C. Do physicians correctly estimate radiation risks from medical imaging? Archives of Environmental Health. 2003;58(1):59–61. doi: 10.3200/AEOH.58.1.59-62.
28. Correia MJ, Hellies A, Andreassi MG, Ghelarducci B, Picano E. Lack of radiological awareness among physicians working in a tertiary-care cardiological center. International Journal of Cardiology. 2005;103(3):307–311. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2004.08.070.
29. Borgen L, Stranden E, Espeland A. Clinicians’ justification of imaging: do radiation issues play a role? Insights into Imaging. 2010;1(3):193–200. doi: 10.1007/s13244-010-0029-4.
30. Abdellah RF, Attia SA, Fouad AM, Abdel-Halim AW. Assessment of physicians’ knowledge, attitude, and practices of radiation safety at Suez Canal University Hospital, Egypt. Open Journal of Radiology. 2015;5(4):250–258. doi: 10.4236/ojrad.2015.54034.
31. Mohammad H, Iortile JT, Garba I, Suwaid MA. Knowledge of radiation and its effects among doctors in Makurdi, North Central Nigeria. International Research Journal of Basic and Clinical Studies. 2013;1(7):103–106.
32. Newton J, Knight D, Woolhead G. General practitioners and clinical guidelines: a survey of knowledge, use, and beliefs. British Journal of General Practice. 1996;46(410):513–517.