A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE EFFECTS OF INTRAVENOUS ESMOLOL, FENTANYL AND LIGNOCAINE ON ATTENUATION OF HEMODYNAMIC RESPONSE TO LARYNGOSCOPY AND ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION
Main Article Content
Keywords
Esmolol, Fentanyl, Lignocaine, Stress Response, Laryngoscopy, Intubation
Abstract
BACKGROUND
This study was conducted to assess the effectiveness and compare the effects of intravenous lignocaine, fentanyl, and esmolol on the reduction of the hemodynamic response to endotracheal intubation and laryngoscopy.
METHODS
After receiving approval from the institutional ethics committee and signed informed consent from the study participants, a prospective comparative study based in a hospital was carried out among 267 patients who underwent elective non-cardiac surgeries at the Department of Anaesthesiology, Government Medical College, Thrissur, between January 2020 and January 2021.
RESULTS
Heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and mean arterial pressure were measured before premedication (baseline), before drug infusion, during laryngoscopy and intubation, and at 1, 3, 5, and 10 minutes following laryngoscopy and intubation. During laryngoscopy and intubation, the hemodynamic response was attenuated in all three groups (esmolol, lignocaine, and fentanyl). Of these, esmolol demonstrated a significant reduction in heart rate, while fentanyl demonstrated a significant reduction in blood pressure during and for up to 10 minutes following laryngoscopy and intubation.
CONCLUSION
The study's findings also show that, when administered prior to the procedure, intravenous fentanyl and esmolol are more effective than preservative-free intravenous lignocaine at reducing the pressor response to laryngoscopy and intubation. Fentanyl has a greater impact on lowering mean, diastolic, and systolic blood pressure than esmolol does on heart rate reduction.
References
2. Aouad MT, Sayyid SS, Zalaket MI, Baraka AS. Intravenous lidocaine as adjuvant to sevoflurane anesthesia for endotracheal intubation in children. Anesth Analg 2003;96(5):1325-7.
3. Abou-Madi MN, Keszler H, Yacoub JM. Cardiovascular reactions to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation following small and large intravenous doses of lidocaine. Can Anaesth Soc J 1977;24(1):12-9.
4. Miller CD, Warren SJ. Lignocaine fails to attenuate the cardiovascular response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth 1990;65(2):216-9.
5. Hamill JF, Bedford RF, Weaver DC, Colohan AR. Lidocaine before endotracheal intubation: intravenous or laryngotracheal? Anesthesiology 1981;55(5):578-80.
6. Wilson IG, Meiklejohn BH, Smith G. Intravenous lignocaine and sympathoadrenal responses to laryngoscopy and intubation. Anaesthesia 1991;46(3):177-80.
7. Helfman SM, Gold MI, DeLisser EA, Herrington CA. Which drug prevents tachycardia and hypertension associated with tracheal intubation: lidocaine, fentanyl, or esmolol? Anesth Analg 1991;72(4):482-6.
8. Feng CK, Chan KH, Liu KN, Or CH, Lee TY. A comparison of lidocaine, fentanyl, and esmolol for attenuation of cardiovascular response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. Acta Anaesthesiol Sin 1996;34(2):61-7.
9. Tamaskar A, Bhargava S, Rao M, Bhargava S, Singh M. Effect of Esmolol hydrochloride on attenuation of stress response during laryngoscopy and intubation in ear, nose and throat (ENT) procedures. Int J Med Res Rev 2015;3(11):1370-7.
10. Parvez G, Ommid M, Kumar Gupta A, Humariya H, Hashia AH. Attenuation of the pressor response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation with intravenous diltiazem and esmolol intravenous in controlled hypertensive surgical patients. Colomb J Anestesiol 2010;38(4):457-69.