A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SUPRACLAVICULAR BRACHIAL PLEXUS BLOCK USING NERVE STIMULATOR VERSUS ULTRASOUND GUIDED METHOD IN INDIAN POPULATION

Main Article Content

Dr Anupriya Chaturvedi
Dr. Archana Vaidya
Dr. Vinay A
Dr. Shweta Nayar

Keywords

Supraclavicular block, Nerve stimulator guided, USG guided, Orthopedic, Sensory, Motor block

Abstract

Background: Peripheral nerve blocks can be performed by several methods. The present study was undertaken to compare peripheral nerve stimulator and US guided supraclavicular block for upper limb orthopedic surgeries in Indian population.


Method: A total 50 patients undergoing upper limb surgeries were enrolled in the study and randomly divided into two groups of 25 patients in each group. Group PNS (Nerve stimulator guided) and Group USG (USG guided) supraclavicular brachial plexus block.


Results: The mean time for block execution in group USG was less (4.12±1.53) compared to group PNS (7.98±1.78), (P<0.05). The mean time of onset of sensory and motor block as well as mean time taken for complete sensory and motor block in group USG was less as compared to group PNS and this was statistically significant, (P<0.05). The quality of sensory and motor block in group PNS was poor as compared to group USG, (p<0.05). Intra and post-operative haemodynamic parameters of patients from Group USG were more stable as compared to Group PNS at different time intervals with no statistical significance, (P>0.05). Majority of patients among Group USG had bradycardia (16%) than group PNS (8%). Most of the patients among Group USG had good success rate (96%) compared to group PNS (76%) with statistically significant difference, (p<0.05).


Conclusion: The supra clavicular brachial plexus block using ultrasound guided method is an improved nerve block technique due to visualization of nerves with more success, decreased complication rate, and less time consuming, smaller volume of local anaesthetic agent required, as compared to nerve stimulator.

Abstract 536 | pdf Downloads 240

References

1. Perlas A, Chan VW, Simmons M. Brachia! plexus examination localization using ultrasound and electrical stimulation, volanter study. Anesthesiology 2003; 99: 42935.
2. Moore DC. Traditional or supraclavicular technique. RegAnaesth 1980; 5:3-5.
3. Tarkase AA, Chauhan SD, Deshmukh S. Evaluation of supraclavicular brachial plexus block using a nerve stimulator versus ultrasound guidance. MedPulse International Journal of Anesthesiology. September 2020; 15(3): 77-81.
4. Carty S, Nicholls B. Ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia. Continuing Education in Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain. 2007;1:20–4.
5. Brown DL, Cahill DR, Bridenbaugh LD. Supraclavicular nerve block: Anatomic analysis of a method to prevent pneumothorax. Anesth Analg. 1993;76:530–4.
6. Casati A., Danelli G., Baciarello M., et al. A prospective, randomized comparison between ultrasound and nerve stimulation guidance for multiple injection axillary brachial plexus block. Anesthesiology. 2007;106(5):992–996.
7. Gili S., Abreo A., GóMez-Fernández M., Solà R., Morros C., Sala-Blanch X. Patterns of distribution of the nerves around the axillary artery evaluated by ultrasound and assessed by nerve stimulation during axillary block. Clinical Anatomy. 2019;32(1):2–8.
8. Fozzard HA, Lee PJ, Lipkind GM. Mechanism of local anesthetic drug action on voltage-gated sodium channels. Current pharmaceutical design. 2005;11(21):2671-86.
9. Dullenkopf A, Borgeat A. Local anesthetic differences and similarities of-caine. The anesthesiologist. 2003;4(52):329-40.
10. Ratnawat A, Bhati FS, Khatri C, Srinivasan B, Sangwan P, Chouhan DP. Comparative study between nerve stimulator guided technique and ultrasound guided technique of supraclavicular nerve block for upper limb surgery. Int J Res Med Sci. 2016;4(6):2101-06.
11. Harikumar A. Comparative Study of Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block Using Nerve Stimulator Vs Ultrasound Guided Method. JMSCR. 2017; 5 (6): (64-69.
12. Rupera KB, Khara BN, Shah VR, Parikh BK. SupraClavicular Brachial Plexus Block: Ultra-Sonography Guided Technique Offer Advantage Over Peripheral Nerve Stimulator Guided Technique. Natl J Med Res. 2013;3(3):241-4.
13. Duncan M, Shetti AN, Tripathy DK, Roshansingh D, Krishnaveni N. A comparative study of nerve stimulator versus ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Anesthesia, essays and researches. 2013;7(3):359.
14. Singh G, Mohammed YS. Comparison between conventional technique and USG guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block in upper limb surgeries. IJSS 2014;2(8):169-76.
15. Simpson G, Nicholls B. Use of ultrasound in chronic pain medicine. Part 1: neuraxial and sympathetic blocks. Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain. 2013;13:145-51.
16. Ryu T, Kil BT, Kim JH. Comparison between ultrasound-guided supraclavicular and interscalene brachial plexus blocks in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery: a prospective, randomized, parallel study. Medicine. 2015;94(40):11-19.
17. Dureja J, Siwach RC, Singh J, Chaudhry G, Bansal P. Comparative evaluation of techniques in supraclavicular brachial plexus block: Conventional blind, nerve stimulator guided, and ultrasound guided. International Journal of Scientific Study. 2015;2(12):125-8.