DO REUSABLE LEARNING OBJECTS IMPROVE THE LEARNING EXPERIENCE OF CRITICAL CARE NURSES AND INCREASE THEIR ACCESS TO UPDATE THEIR INFORMATION

Main Article Content

Abdulhadi Mohammed Alahmadi
Omar Alsalemi
Majed Dakhel Alahmadi
Waleed thuwab Al-Jabri
Mohammed Hamed Alahmadi

Keywords

RLOs, critical care nurses, professional development, Saudi Arabia, perceptions

Abstract

Objective: Online learning platforms offer accessibility and personalization, but traditional courseware models often fail to maximize their advantages. Reusable learning objects (RLOs), self-contained digital learning modules, hold potential for individualized and adaptive learning experiences. However, their effectiveness in critical care nursing education, particularly in culturally diverse contexts like Saudi Arabia, remains underexplored. This study investigates the perceptions and experiences of critical care nurses in Saudi Arabia regarding RLOs as tools for professional development. 


Methods: A cross sectional design was employed, integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches. A validated online questionnaire was distributed to 260 critical care nurses in governmental healthcare facilities in Madinah, Saudi Arabia, assessing demographics, RLO perceptions, usage patterns, challenges, and views on future integration. Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and correlation analyses were performed using SPSS. Qualitative data from open-ended survey questions underwent thematic analysis.. 


Results: Nurses hold diverse views on RLOs, with 52.3% having a positive perception and 47.7% a negative one. Higher education levels and extended experience positively correlate with favorable RLO perceptions. Nurses appreciate RLOs' convenience, potential for engagement, and contribution to clinical knowledge and skills. Challenges include lack of awareness, time constraints, and content not tailored to Saudi context. Nurses advocate for RLO integration in future professional development, seeking engaging formats and culturally relevant content. 


Conclusion: RLOs hold promise for enhancing critical care education in Saudi Arabia, but successful implementation requires addressing awareness, accessibility, and cultural sensitivity.

Abstract 88 | PDF Downloads 14

References

1. Gause G, Mokgaola IO, Rakhudu MA: Technology usage for teaching and learning in nursing education: An integrative review. Curationis 2022, 45(1):e1-e9.
2. McGarity T, Monahan L, Acker K, Pollock W: Nursing Graduates’ Preparedness for Practice: Substantiating the Call for Competency-Evaluated Nursing Education. Behavioral Sciences 2023, 13(7):553.
3. Khan E, Tarling M, Calder I: Reusable learning objects for nurse education: development, evaluation, challenges and recommendations. British Journal of Nursing 2019, 28(17):1136-1143.
4. Gee BM, Strickland J, Salazar L: The role of reusable learning objects in occupational therapy entry-level education. The Open Journal of Occupational Therapy 2014, 2(4):6.
5. Alebaikan RA: Developing reusable learning objects (RLOs): The importance of social and cultural contexts. In: EdMedia+ Innovate Learning: 2013: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE); 2013: 1239-1245.
6. Redmond C, Davies C, Cornally D, Adam E, Daly O, Fegan M, O'Toole M: Using reusable learning objects (RLOs) in wound care education: Undergraduate student nurse's evaluation of their learning gain. Nurse Educ Today 2018, 60:3-10.
7. Williams J, O'Connor M, Windle R, Wharrad HJ: Using reusable learning objects (rlos) in injection skills teaching: Evaluations from multiple user types. Nurse Educ Today 2015, 35(12):1275-1282.
8. Risling T: Educating the nurses of 2025: Technology trends of the next decade. Nurse Educ Pract 2017, 22:89-92.
9. Smart D, Ross K, Carollo S, Williams-Gilbert W: Contextualizing Instructional Technology to the Demands of Nursing Education. Comput Inform Nurs 2020, 38(1):18-27.
10. Al-Yateem N, AlYateem S, Rossiter R: Cultural and Religious Educational Needs of Overseas Nurses Working in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. Holist Nurs Pract 2015, 29(4):205-215.
11. Uttley J: Power Analysis, Sample Size, and Assessment of Statistical Assumptions—Improving the Evidential Value of Lighting Research. LEUKOS 2019, 15(2-3):143-162.
12. DeSouza K, Pit SW, Moehead A: Translating facilitated multimodal online learning into effective person-centred practice for the person living with dementia among health care staff in Australia: an observational study. BMC Geriatr 2020, 20(1):33.
13. Alfaleh R, East L, Smith Z, Wang S-Y: Nurses' perspectives, attitudes and experiences related to e-learning: A systematic review. Nurse Education Today 2023:105800.
14. Gadioli B, Fulquini FL, Kusumota L, Gimenes FRE, Carvalho ECd: Construction and validation of a virtual learning object for the teaching of peripheral venous vascular semiology. Escola Anna Nery 2018, 22.
15. Windle RJ, McCormick D, Dandrea J, Wharrad H: The characteristics of reusable learning objects that enhance learning: A case‐study in health‐science education. British Journal of Educational Technology 2011, 42(5):811-823.