CODING OF HEART FAILURE DIAGNOSES IN SASKATCHEWAN: A VALIDATION STUDY OF HOSPITAL DISCHARGE ABSTRACTS
Main Article Content
Keywords
Diagnosis, heart failure, validation, epidemiology
Abstract
Background
Validity of Heart Failure (HF) diagnoses from administrative records has not been extensively evaluated, especially with respect to small / unselected hospitals.
Objectives
To determine the positive predictive value of a primary / most responsible diagnosis of HF among a general population of subjects discharged from Saskatchewan hospitals.
Methods
Using administrative health records from the Province of Saskatchewan, Canada, we identified subjects experiencing their first HF hospitalization between 1994 and 2003. From this cohort, we randomly selected 500 subjects for individual validation using Framingham and Carlson criteria.
Results
The 466 charts available for analysis, 74% (345/466) and 63.9% (298/466) of subjects met criteria for a clinical diagnosis of HF based on Framingham or Carlson criteria, respectively; 57.5% (268/466) met both criterion. Provincial hospitals (located in the largest urban centres) were associated with the highest proportion of confirmed HF diagnoses (87.8% by Framingham criteria) compared to progressively smaller hospitals (regional 77.9%; district 64.2%; and community 60.0%). Accuracy also differed when stratified by physician category. Cardiologists and internists were associated with the highest rates of confirmed diagnoses [97.5% (39 / 40) and 85.0% (34 / 40)] compared to general practitioners [73.1% (95 / 130)] and other physicians [69.1% (177 / 256)], by Framingham criteria.
Conclusions
Hospital discharge abstracts indicating HF are frequently inaccurate. These findings have important implications for the epidemiologic study of HF as well as the clinical management of patients.
References
2. Hunt SA, Abraham WT, Chin MH, et al. Focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2005 guidelines for the diagnosis and management of heart failure in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2009;119:1977-2016.
3. Arnold JMO, Liu P, Demers C, et al. Canadian Cardiovascular Society consensus conference recommendations on heart failure 2006: Diagnosis and management. Can J Cardiol 2006;22:23-45.
4. Lamb DA, Eurich DT, McAlister FA, et al. Changes in adherence to evidence-based medications in the first year after initial hospitalization for heart failure. Observational cohort study from 1994 to 2003. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2009;2:228-35.
5. Lee DS, Mamdani MM, Austin PC, et al. Trends in Heart Failure Outcomes and Pharmacotherapy: 1992 to 2000. Am J Med 2004;116:581-9.
6. Gislason GH, Rasmussen JN, Abildstrom SZ, et al. Persistent use of evidence-based pharmacotherapy in heart failure is associated with improved outcomes. Circulation 2007;116:737-44.
7. Blackledge HM, Tomlinson J, Squire IB. Prognosis for patients newly admitted to hospital with heart failure: survival trends in 12,220 index admissions in Leicestershire 1993-2001. Heart 2003;89: 615-20.
8. Schaufelberger M, Swedberg K, Koster M, Rosen M, Rosengren A. Decreasing one-year mortality and hospitalization rates for heart failure in Sweden: Data from the Swedish hospital discharge registry 1988 to 2000. Eur Heart J 2004;25:300-7.
9. Cowie MR, Mosterd A, Wood DA, et al. The epidemiology of heart failure. Eur Heart J 1997;18:208-25.
10. Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada. The growing burden of heart disease and stroke in Canada 2003. Ottawa, Canada 2003.
11. Curkendall SM, DeLuise C, Jones JK, et al. Cardiovascular disease in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Saskatchewan Canada. Ann Epidemiol 2006;16:63-70.
12. Goff DC, Pandey DK, Chan FA, Ortiz C, Nichaman MZ. Congestive heart failure in the United States: Is there more than meets the I (CD Code)? The Corpus Christi Heart Project. Arch Intern Med 2000;160(2):197-202.
13. Lee DS, Donovan L, Austin PC, et al. Comparison of coding of heart failure and comorbidities in administrative and clinical data for use in outcomes research. Med Care 2005;43:182-8.
14. Quan H, Parsons GA, Ghali WA. Validity of information on comorbidity derived from ICD- 9-CCM administrative data. Med Care 2002;40:675-85.
15. Fonesca C, Sarmento PM, Marques F, Ceia F. Validity of a discharge diagnosis of heart failure: implications of misdiagnosing. Congest Heart Fail 2008;14:187-91.
16. Ingelsson E, Arnlov J, Sundstrom J, Lind L. The validity of a diagnosis of heart failure in a hospital discharge register. Eur J Heart Fail 2005;7:787-91.
17. Khand AU, Shaw M, Gemmel I, Cleland JGF. Do discharge codes underestimate hospitalisation due to heart failure? Validation study of hospital discharge coding for heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail 2005;7:792-7.
18. Kumler T, Gislason GH, Kirk V, et al. Accuracy of a heart failure diagnosis in administrative registers. Eur J Heart Fail 2008;10:658-60.
19. Merry AHH, Boer JMA, Schouten LJ, et al. Validity of coronary heart diseases and heart failure based on hospital discharge and mortality data in the Netherlands using the cardiovascular registry of Maastricht cohort study. Eur J Epidemiol 2009;24:237-47.
20. Stewart S, MacIntyre K, MacLeod MMC, Bailey AEM, Capewell S, McMurray JJV. Trends in hospitalization for heart failure in Scotland, 1990 - 1996. Eur Heart J 2001;22:209-17.
21. Tsuyuki RT, Shibata MC, Nilsson C, Hervas- Malo M. Contemporary burden of illness of congestive heart failure in Canada. Can J Cardiol 2003;19(4):436-8.
22. Lien CTC, Gillespie ND, Struthers AD, McMurdo MET. Heart failure in frail elderly patients: diagnostic difficulties, co-morbidities, polypharmacy and treatment dilemmas. Eur J Heart Fail 2002;4: 91-8.
23. Di Bari M, Pozzi C, Cavallini MC, et al. The diagnosis of heart failure in the community. Comparative validation of four sets of criteria in unselected older adults: The ICARe Dicomano Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:1601-8.
24. Remes J, Miettinen H, Reunanen A, Pyorala K. Validity of clinical diagnosis of heart failure in primary health care. Eur Heart J 1991;12:315- 21.
25. Statistics Canada. Canadian Classification of Diagnostic, Therapeutic, and Surgical Procedures (CCP). 2nd ed. Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services Canada; 1986.
26. Carlson KJ, Lee DC, Goroll AH, Leahy M, Johnson RA. An analysis of physicians' reasons for prescribing long-term digitalis therapy in outpatients. J Chron Dis 1985;38(9):733-9.
27. McKee PA, Castelli WP, McNamara PM, Kannel WB. The natural history of congestive heart failure: the Framingham Study. N Engl J Med 1971;285:1441-6.
28. Von Korf M, Wagner EH, Saunders K. A chronic disease score from automated pharmacy data. J Clin Epidemiol 1992;45(2):197-203.
29. Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic heart failure: executive summary (update 2005). Euro Hrt J 2005;26:1115-40.
30. Haldeman GA, Croft JB, Giles WH, Rashidee A. Hospitalization of patients with heart failure: National hospital discharge survey, 1985 to 1995. Am Heart J 1999;137:352-60.
31. Owan TE, Hodge DO, Gerges RM, Jacobsen SJ, Roger VL, Redfield MM. Trends in prevalence and outcome of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. N Engl J Med 2006;355:251-9.