CLINICAL MEASUREMENT OF PROXIMAL CONTACT AREAS OF MAXILLARY ANTERIOR DENTITION

Main Article Content

Dr. Umber Zahra Sarfraz Syed
Prof. Dr. Saima Razzaq Khan
Dr. Aisha Butt
Dr. Anam Fayyaz
Dr. Moeen ud Din Ahmad
Dr. Aosaf Anwar Memon

Keywords

Anterior (MeSH), Area (MeSH), Contact (MeSH), Dentition (MeSH), Digital Vernier Caliper (Non-MeSH), Measurement (MeSH), Proximal (MeSH), Teeth (MeSH)

Abstract

Objectives: The primary aim of this study was to establish a database detailing the apico-incisal dimensions of proximal contact areas (PCA) and their corresponding proximal contact area proportions (PCAP) for maxillary anterior teeth (MAT).


Methods: This morphometric cross-sectional study involved 200 healthy participants was conducted at Lahore Medical & Dental College. A Digital Vernier Caliper (6-inch, 150 mm) was utilized and the clinical measurements were directly taken within each participant's oral cavity. Clinical parameters, the heights of PCAs and clinical crowns from the right to the left maxillary premolar, were recorded. PCAP values were derived using the formula: PCAP = (Height of mesial PCA of the corresponding tooth / Crown Length) × 100.


 


Results: A total of 1400 interdental sites (7 per participant) were measured. The statistical analysis revealed no significant relationship between age, gender, and the heights of proximal contact areas (P > 0.05). According to the Paired sample t-test, PCA dimensions exhibited significant differences on both sides of each tooth (P value < 0.0001). Mesial contacts areas were larger than distal contacts for each anterior tooth. 


Conclusion: The study's findings showed a bilateral decrease in mean PCA and PCAP values as one moves away from the midline. Mean PCA values for contacts between central incisors, central-lateral incisors, and lateral incisor-canine were measured at 4 mm, 3 mm, and 2 mm, respectively. The generated database serves as a valuable guide for clinicians, aiding them in achieving optimal outcomes in restorative dentistry.

Abstract 327 | PDF Downloads 163

References

1. Bento VAA, Gomes JM, Lemos CA, Limirio JP, Rosa CD, Pellizzer EP. Prevalence of proximal contact loss between implant-supported prostheses and adjacent natural teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2023;129(3):404-12.
2. Ahmed N, Khalid S, Vohra F, Halim MS, Al-Saleh S, Tulbah HI, et al. Analysis of recurrent esthetic dental proportion of natural maxillary anterior teeth: A systematic review. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2022.
3. Kedia S, Kumathalli K, Sridhar R, Parwani S, Tekade S, Warekar A. Influence of interdental embrasures on interdental papilla. Journal of Craniomaxillofacial Research. 2021:197-209.
4. Zhang Y, Hong G, Zhang Y, Sasaki K, Wu H. Minimally invasive procedures for deficient interdental papillae: A review. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2020;32(5):463-71.
5. Gracis S, Llobell A, Chu SJ. Contemporary concepts on periodontal complications from prosthetic and restorative therapies. Periodontology 2000. 2023;92(1):159-96.
6. Kolte AP, Kolte RA, Bawankar P. Proximal contact areas of maxillary anterior teeth and their influence on interdental papilla. The Saudi dental journal. 2018;30(4):324-9.
7. Stappert CF, Tarnow DP, Tan JH, Chu SJ. Proximal contact areas of the maxillary anterior dentition. The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry. 2010;30(5):471.
8. Kolte AP, Kolte RA, Purohit MJ, Bajaj VA. Proportions in papilla, crestal papilla, and proximal contact area in maxillary anterior teeth: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology. 2022;26(5):492.
9. Cho J-H, Çakmak G, Yi Y, Yoon H-I, Yilmaz B, Schimmel M. Tooth morphology, internal fit, occlusion, and proximal contacts of dental crowns designed by deep learning-based dental software: A comparative study. Journal of Dentistry. 2023:104830.
10. Patil VA, Desai MH. Assessment of gingival contours for esthetic diagnosis and treatment: A clinical study. Indian Journal of Dental Research. 2013;24(3):394-5.
11. Sghaireen MG, Al-Zarea BK, Al-Shorman HM, Al-Omiri MK. Clinical measurement of the height of the interproximal contact area in maxillary anterior teeth. International Journal of Health Sciences. 2013;7(3):325.
12. Tarnow DP, Magner AW, Fletcher P. The effect of the distance from the contact point to the crest of bone on the presence or absence of the interproximal dental papilla. Journal of periodontology. 1992;63(12):995-6.
13. Suilkowski A. Aesthetic Restorative Dentistry: Principles and Practice. 2008.
14. Martegani P, Silvestri M, Mascarello F, Scipioni T, Ghezzi C, Rota C, et al. Morphometric study of the interproximal unit in the esthetic region to correlate anatomic variables affecting the aspect of soft tissue embrasure space. Journal of periodontology. 2007;78(12):2260-5.
15. de Santana RB, de Miranda JLC, de Santana CMM. The relationship between open versus normal contact point and inter‐proximal papilla dimensions in periodontally healthy young adults: A controlled clinical trial. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2017;44(11):1164-71.
16. Sghaireen MG, Albhiran HM, Alzoubi IA, Lynch E, Al-Omiri MK. Intraoral versus extraoral measurement of the height of the interproximal contact area in maxillary anterior teeth. Medical Principles and Practice. 2015;24(2):136-41.
17. Chen M-C, Chan C-P, Tu Y-K, Liao Y-F, Ku Y-C, Kwong L-K, et al. Factors influencing the length of the interproximal dental papilla between maxillary anterior teeth. Journal of Dental Sciences. 2009;4(3):103-9.
18. Özdemir H, Köseoğlu M, Bayindir F. An investigation of the esthetic indicators of maxillary anterior teeth in young Turkish people. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2018;120(4):583-8.
19. Mahasneh SA, Goodwin M, Pretty I, Cunliffe J. The use of radiographs to assess the impact of the distance between the contact area and the crest of the bone to predict the presence or absence of interdental papilla: an in vivo study. British Dental Journal. 2023:1-6.