COMPARISON OF BUFFERED WITH STANDARD LOCAL ANESTHESIA IN ODONTOGENIC INFECTIONS; A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Main Article Content

Syeda Mahnoor Fatima
Muhammad Ishaq
Ali Akhtar Khan
Raeha Nadeem
Zahra Saeed
Syeda Soveba Zaidi

Keywords

alkalinization, adjusting pH, Buffering, local anesthetic, Pain, sodium bicarbonate visual analog scale (VAS)

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy of buffered local anesthetic with standard local anesthetic for insight into pain reduction and speed of onset of anesthesia in the presence of odontogenic infections for maxillary or mandibular infiltration.


Study Design: Double-blinded, Randomized clinical trial (Clinical trial number: IRCT202306220 58557N2).


Place and Duration of Study: Department of Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry, Rawalpindi, from March 2020 to September 2023.


Patients and Methods: A total of 100 (Group I-50, Group II-50) patients were included in the study who presented with odontogenic infection. All 100 patients received 2% lignocaine hydrochloride with adrenaline 1:100,000 and of these 100 patients,50 received a 1:10 dilution of the anesthetic cartridge with 0.18 ml solution of 8.4% sodium bicarbonate. The pain was accessed on a Visual analog scale before and after injection. The onset speed was measured by the time taken for the tissues injected to become numb after retrieval of the needle.


Results: According to the Visual Analog Scale score, the mean (SD) level of pain perceived after injection in Group I was 2.80 (0.83), and in Group II was 4.067 (1.65) which is statistically significant result (p=0.001). The mean (SD) time of onset of anesthesia in minutes was 1.32 (0.41) for the buffered group compared to 2.82 (0.45) for the non-buffered group respectively (p= <0.001).


Conclusion: The use of buffered anesthesia significantly reduced the pain and time for the onset of anesthesia compared to standard lignocaine cartridges, particularly in infected areas, thus increasing the effectiveness of local anesthetic injections.

Abstract 126 | pdf Downloads 57

References

1. Becker DE, Reed KL. Local Anesthetics: Review of Pharmacological Considerations. Anesthesia Prog. 2012;59(2):90–102. https://doi.org/10.2344/0003-3006-59.2.90
2. Körner J, Albani S, Sudha Bhagavath Eswaran V, Roehl AB, Rossetti G, Lampert A. Sodium Channels and Local Anesthetics—Old Friends With New Perspectives. Front. Pharmacol. 2022;13: 837088. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.837088
3. Cherobin AC, Tavares GT. Safety of local anesthetics. An Bras Dermatol. 2020;95(1):82-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abd.2019.09.025
4. Strazar AR, Leynes PG, Lalonde DH. Minimizing the pain of local anesthesia injection. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132(3):675-84. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31829ad1e2
5. Bartfield JM, Gennis P, Barbera J, Breuer B, Gallagher EJ. Buffered versus plain lidocaine as a local anesthetic for simple laceration repair. Ann Emerg Med. 1990;19(12):1387-9.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0196-0644(05)82603-4
6. Senthoor P, Janani K, Ravindran C. A Prospective, Randomized Double-Blinded Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Buffered Local Anesthetics in Infected and Inflamed Pulp and Periapical Tissues. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2020;19(2):246-50.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-019-01188-y
7. Best CA, Best AA, Best TJ, Hamilton DA. Buffered lidocaine and bupivacaine mixture - the ideal local anesthetic solution?. Plast Surg (Oakv). 2015;23(2):87-90.
https://doi.org/10.4172/plastic-surgery.1000913
8. Frank SG, Lalonde DH. How acidic is the lidocaine we are injecting, and how much bicarbonate should we add? Can J Plast Surg. 2012;20(2):71-3.
https://doi.org/10.1177/229255031202000207
9. Woolf CJ. What is this thing called pain? J Clin Invest. 2010;120(11):3742-4. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI45178
10. Kashyap VM, Desai R, Reddy PB, Menon S. Effect of alkalinisation of lignocaine for intraoral nerve block on pain during injection, and speed of onset of anaesthesia. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;49(8):72-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2011.04.068
11. Saeed SA. Mahmood S. Baig NJ. Khan NA. Rasheed N. Kakar NA. Effect of warming anesthetic solution on pain perception during maxillary infiltration: a split mouth randomized controlled trial. Pak Armed Forces Med J. 2022;72(1):240-3
https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v72i1.6860
12. Fitton AR. Ragbir M. Milling MAP. The use of pH adjusted lignocaine in controlling operative pain in the day surgery unit: a prospective, randomised trial. Br J Plast Surg. 1996;49(6):404-8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0007-1226(96)90011-9
13. Keswani ES, Venkateshwar G. Odontogenic Maxillofacial Space Infections: A 5-Year Retrospective Review in Navi Mumbai. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2019;18(3):345-3.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-018-1152-x
14. Arora G, Degala S. Dasukil S. Efficacy of buffered local anaesthetics in head and neck infections. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019; 57(9); 857-60.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2019.06.021
15. Madeswaran. Sathyasree. Jayachandran. Sivakumarl. Sodium Bicarbonate: A Review and its Uses in Dentistry. Indian Journal of Dental Research. 2018;29(5):672-7.
https://doi.org/10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_30_17
16. Senewiratne NL, Woodall A, Can AS. Sodium Bicarbonate [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 [cited 2023 Dec 1]. Available from:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK559139/#__NBK559139_ai_
17. Bala M. Taiwo AO. Ibikunle AA. Olasoji HO. Sulaiman AO.Chukwuma BC et al. Effectiveness of buffered and non-buffered local anaesthetic in inferior alveolar nerve block: a randomised study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023;61(5):351-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2023.03.015
18. Tirupathi SP, Rajasekhar S. Buffered versus unbuffered local anesthesia for inferior alveolar nerve block injections in children: a systematic review. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2020;20(5):271-9. https://doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2020.20.5.271
19. Dhake P, Nagpal D, Chaudhari P, Lamba G, Hotwani K, Singh P. Buffered articaine infiltration for primary maxillary molar extractions: a randomized controlled study. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2022 Oct;22(5):387-94. https://doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2022.22.5.387

Most read articles by the same author(s)