A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN SUBCUTICUALR AND MATTRESS SUTURES IN INGUINOSCROTAL SURGERIES

Main Article Content

Dr. Menta Yaswanth Kasyap
Dr. Budamala Sarada
Dr. Bathena Sobha Rani
Dr. Shaik Nazma
Dr. Burramukku Uha Pranavi
Dr. Shaik Naseer Hussain

Keywords

Sub cuticular, Mattress, Monocryl, Ethylon

Abstract

Background: A good cosmetic scar gives patient good satisfaction along with mental ease to the surgeon performed the surgery. Cosmesis is an important aspect in present day to day scenarios. Scar is the only visible thing to patient but not the procedure of surgery. So a good cosmetic scar means good surgery for any patient. Latest advancements in surgical procedures like minimally invasive surgeries, laparoscopic surgeries and robotic surgeries are mainly to reduce the scar size for patients and to get a good cosmetic appearance. For only skin closure various techniques like various skin closure techniques, skin staples, clips, sterile strips and glue adhesives are available.


Methods: The study is conducted in 200 patients in S.V.R.R.G.G.H hospital, Tirupati in department of general surgery. First 200 patients operated for inguinoscrotal swellings who met all the inclusion criteria in Department of General Surgery in SVRRGGH, TIRUPATI. Patients was given consecutive numbers and all the patients with odd number were sutured by Mattress technique and even number were sutured by Subcuticular technique. In all the selected patients wound closure was done according to the depth in layer wise manner. Care was taken to secure good hemostasis and good approximation of wound edges. Wound size and time taken for wound closure was noted in all patients using Flexible scale and Stop watch. Post operative examination  of wound was done on 3rd day, 5th day, 1 month, 2 months and 3 months. Closure by Mattress sutures in 50% of patients and by Subcuticular sutures in other 50% of patients.


Results: In present study comparison between vertical mattress and sub cuticular  closure techniques in clean inguinoscrotal surgeries was done. In present study we get to know that, time taken for skin closure was significantly less for vertical mattress    technique when compared to sub cuticular technique. Post operative pain was more in vertical mattress technique when compared  to subcuticular technique on post operative day 0, 1, 3 and 5. Post operative wound complications were more in vertical mattress technique  when compared to subcuticular technique. Cosmesis of the scar is better in subcuticular technique when compared to  vertical mattress technique.


Conclusion: From the above findings we can get a conclusion that except in time taken for procedure Sub cuticular technique is superior when compared to Vertical mattress technique. The time taken for closure can be reduced even in cases of sub cuticular technique by more and more practice of that technique.

Abstract 110 | pdf Downloads 59

References

1. Singer AJ, Hollander JE, Valentine SM, Turque TW, McCuskey CF, Quinn JV: Prospective, randomized, controlled trial of tissue adhesive(2- octylcyanoacrylate) vs standard wound closure techniques for laceration repair. Stony Brook Octylcyanoacrylate Study Group. Acad Emerg Med.1998; 5: 94-99.
2. Nagpal BM, Gaurav Kumar, Nagi GS, Pradeep Singh: Sutureless closure of operative skin wounds. MJAFI.2004; 60: 131-133
3. Farion KJ, Osmond MH, Hartling L, Russell KF, Klassen TP,Crumley E, Wiebe N: Tissue adhesives for traumatic lacerations: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Acad Emerg Med.2003. 10: 110-8
4. Gupta C, Agarwal M, Sharma LB, Rastogi AN, Shukla VK: Sutureless closure of surgical wounds. Indian Journal of Surgery.1999; 61: 170-3.
5. [Internet]. Jaypeejournals.com. 2018 [cited 4 December 2018].Available from:http://www.jaypeejournals.com/eJournals/ShowText.aspx?ID=536&TYP=TOP&is PD F=YES.
6. Finn Gottrup, David Leaper. Wound healing: Historical Aspects EWMA
Journal 2004;4(2):21-26
7. Haribabu M. A Comparitive Study of Two Skin Closure Techniques Subcuticular Monocryl and Vertical Mattress Suture in Cases Posted For Inguinoscrotal Surgeries. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences. 2019;18(6):43–52.
8. Ghag GS, Shukla KS, Karanjkar A. A Comparative Study of Stapled VsSubcuticularVs Simple Interrupted Closure of Inguinal Hernia Incision. IOSR J Dent Med Sci 2016;15(9): 97-105.
9. Karthikeyan S, Balasubramanian S, Siddarthan R, Sarath R. Stapler Suturing Vs Conventional Suturing -A Comparitive Study on the Outcome of wound closure in Abdominal Skin Incisions. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences. 2018;17(2):9–15.
10. Sureshkumar S, Souraja D, Archana E, Sathar S, Mahalakshmy T, Palanivel C. Comparison of skin closure technique with stapler and subcuticular suture in patients with inguinal hernia undergoing lichtenstein tension-free mesh repair – An open-label randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Advanced Medical and Health Research. 2020;7(1):27.
11. Patel K, Rabari M. Comparison between interrupted vertical mattress suture versus skin stapler versus subcuticular suture for skin closure in clean surgery. Int J Res Med. 2014;3(3):164-168.
12. Abdul-Hadi Safar A. COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN INTERRUPTED MATTRESS AND CONTINUOUS SUBCUTICULAR SKIN CLOSURE IN REGARDING POST-APPENDECTOMY WOUND INFECTION. Basrah Journal of Surgery. 2016 Jun 28;22(1):17–24.
13. Joshi D. A comparative study of subcuticular versus three mattress sutures for pfannenstiel skin closure in obstetrics and gynaecological surgeries. Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research. 2016;3(4):410-413

Most read articles by the same author(s)