Main Article Content

Dr. Muhammad Zaheer Khan
Dr. Farrukh Shahzad
Dr. Nouman Khaliq
Dr. Ehtesham ul Hiq
Dr. Nazia Malik
Masroor Ahmad
Dr. Muhammad Idrees
Muhammad Saeed Ahmad
Dr. Muhammad Hussain
Mujahid Iqbal


Social Safety net Interventions (SNNIs), disability, Persons with Disabilities (PWDs), Pakistan


This study is designed to explore the social safety net interventions particularly for persons with disabilities (PWD). There is a broad range of social safety net interventions; however, the present study focuses on social assistance broadly in the form of cash transfer, health care facilities, and accessibility to social safety net interventions by the persons with disabilities in Pakistan. In Pakistan, private safety net interventions in the form of informal and formal arrangements by the state help lessen the adverse outcomes on marginalized segment. The goal of social safety net Interventions (SSNIs) is to protect marginalized segment from the economic and social consequences of a large plunge in family earnings. As compare to savings or financial institution accounts, SSNIs are mostly projected to provide as a redistributive instrument, distributing money to the poorest of the poor to lift them out of poverty, as well as to give beneficiaries better opportunities to shrink their risk of incurring tragic monetary loss. Quantitative information gathered through 500 disabled persons registered in BISP Database i.e. National Socio-Economic Registry (NSER). Data was coded and entered in SPSS-20.  Descriptive statistics and Bi-variate analysis was conducted to know the relationship between explanatory variable and response variable. Findings reveal that social safety nets interventions social protection empowers persons with disability.


Abstract 244 | pdf Downloads 101


1 Bitler, M., Hoynes, H., & Kuka, E. (2017). Child poverty, the great recession, and the social safety net in the United States. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 36(2), 358-389.
2 Coleridge, P. (1993) Disability, Liberation and Development. OXFAM: OxfordDohmen, Josh, (2016). “Disability as Abject: Kristeva, Disability, and Resistance”, Hypatia, 31(4): 762–778. doi:10.1111/hypa.12266
3 Fox, A., M. (2017). “We Must Be Critical: The Current Purpose of Disability Studies”, Disability Studies Quarterly, 37(3). doi:10.18061/dsq.v37i3.5925
4 Hussain, S., Shahzad, F., & Ahmad, S. (2023). A Classification Framework for Analyzing the War and Peacemaking Potential of News Media in Pakistan. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 58(5), 794-811.
5 Kahane, G., and J. Savulescu, (2009), “The Welfarist Account of Disability,” in Disability and Disadvantage (eds.) Brownlee, K.; Cureton, A., New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 14–53.
6 Sadoulet, E. and A. de Janvry (2004), Making Conditional Cash Transfers More Efficient, Working Paper, University of California, Berkeley
7 Safety Net Programs and Poverty Reduction: Lessons from Cross-Country Experience, The World Bank, Washington, D.C, 2014..
8 San Emeterio, C., Menéndez, H., Guillén-Rogel, P., & Marín, P. J. (2022). The reliability of a smartphone application in measuring the foot structure of cyclists during sitting and standing. Footwear Science, 14(1), 45-56.
9 Shahzad, Farrukh, and S. A. Siraj. "Analysing intermedia agenda setting influence between social media and electronic media: A perspective from Pakistan." Journal of Peace, Development and Communication 4.2 (2020): 478-496.
10 Sifat, R. I. (2020). Social Safety Net (SSN) Programs in Bangladesh: Issues and Challenges. Journal of Social Service Research, 1-3.
11 Subbarao, K. (1997), Namibia’s Social Safety Net: Issues and Options for Reform, The World Bank. Subbarao, K., A. Bonnerjee, J. Braithwaite, S. Carvalho, K. Ezemenari, C. Graham, and A. Thompson (1997), WHO (2001), International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, Geneva, World Health Organization.
12 World Health Organization. (2014). Disabilities. Retrieved September 18, 2014, from, A. and T. Burchardt (2003), Comparing Incomes When Needs Differ: Equivalisation for the Extra Costs of Disability in the UK, CASE paper 64, London School of Economics