EFFECT OF ADDING DEXMEDETOMIDINE VERSUS FENTANYL TO INTRATHECAL HYPERBARIC BUPIVACAINE ON SPINAL BLOCK FOR INFRAUMBILICAL ELECTIVE SURGERIES

Main Article Content

Dr. Jayesh Hadiya
Dr. Bhushan Ambare
Dr. Monika Masare
Dr. Vinay Dhakate
Dr. Prashant Patil

Keywords

Dexmedetomidine, Fentanyl, Intrathecal Hyperbaric Bupivacaine, Spinal Block, Infraumbilical Elective Surgeries

Abstract

Background: This study was conducted to compare the two adjuvant agents, dexmedetomidine (5μg) and fentanyl (25μg) added to 15mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine introduced intrathecally for infraumbilical surgeries.


Methods: This was a hospital-based prospective, randomized clinical study conducted among 90 adult patients belonging to ASA Grades I and II of either sex undergoing elective infra-umbilical surgeries. The study was carried out in a tertiary care centre in the Department of Anaesthesiology of the Medical College and Hospital, from November 2011 to June 2013 after obtaining clearance from the institutional ethics committee and written informed consent from the study participants.


Results: The mean time to achieve sensory regression to the T12 level in group C was shorter as compared to groups F and D and these differences were found to be highly significant statistically. The difference in the results between group D and group F was statistically significant, with group D having a longer duration of sensory block. The differences in mean duration of complete motor block, complete analgesia, and mean time of rescue analgesia between the three groups were found to be statistically highly significant. Thus, dexmedetomidine (group D) has a longer duration than bupivacaine (group C) and fentanyl (group F).


Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant significantly prolongs the duration of complete analgesia and the time of rescue analgesia as compared to fentanyl and bupivacaine. The postoperative analgesic requirement was less for dexmedetomidine as compared to fentanyl and bupivacaine, leading to improved quality of analgesia.

Abstract 273 | pdf Downloads 149

References

1. Bajwa SJS, Kaur J, Singh G, Singh G, Arora V, Gupta S, et al. Dexmedetomidine and clonidine in epidural anaesthesia. Indian J Anesth 2011;55(2):116-21.
2. Labbene I, Lamine K, Gharsallah H, Jebali A, Adhoum A, Ghozzi S, et al. Spinal anesthesia for endoscopic urological surgery. Middle East J Anesthesiol 2007;19(2):369-84.
3. Gupta R, Verma R, Bogra J, Kohli M, Raman R, Kushwaha JK. A comparative study of intrathecal dexmedetomidine and fentanyl as adjuvants to bupivacaine. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2011;27(3):339-43.
4. Al-Ghanem, SM, Massad IM, Al-Mustafa MM, Al-Zaben KR, Qudaisat IY, et al. Effect of adding dexmedetomidine versus fentanyl to intrathecal bupivacaine on spinal block characteristics in gynecological procedures: a double blind controlled study. Am J Applied Sci 2009;6(5):882-7.
5. Al-Mustafa MM, Abu-Halaweh SA, Aloweidi AS, Murshidi MM, Ammari BA, Awwad ZM, et al. Effect of dexmedetomidine added to spinal bupivacaine for urological procedures. Saudi Med J 2009;30(3):365-70.
6. Eid HE, Shafie MA, Youssef H. Dose-related prolongation of hyperbaric bupivacaine spinal anesthesia by dexmedetomidine. Ain Shams J Anesthesiology 2011;4(2):83-95.
7. Yegin A, Sanli S, Hadimioglu N, Akbas M, Karsli B. Intrathecal fentanyl added to hyperbaric ropivacaine for transurethral resection of the prostate. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2005;49(3):401-5.
8. Motiani P, Chaudhary S, Bahl N, Sethi AK. Intrathecal Sufentanil versus Fentanyl for lower limb surgeries – a randomized controlled trial. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2010;26(4):507-13.
9. Khezri MB, Yaghobi S, Hajikhani M, Asefzadeh S. Comparison of postoperative analgesic effect of intrathecal magnesium and fentanyl added to bupivacaine in patients undergoing lower limb orthopedic surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan 2012;50(1):19-24.
10. Kanazi GE, Aouad MT, JabbourKhoury SI, Al-Jazzar MD, Alameddine MM, AlYaman R, et al. Effect of low-dose dexmedetomidine or clonidine on the characteristics of bupivacaine spinal block. Acta Anesthesiol Scand 2006;50(2):222-7.