ILEOSTOMY IN NEWBORNS: A COMPREHENSIVE 15-YEAR STUDY INVESTIGATING CAUSES, TIMING, AND NEUROLOGICAL OUTCOMES FOLLOWING BOWEL OBSTRUCTION
Main Article Content
Keywords
.
Abstract
Background: Advancements in perinatal care have increased the survival rates of low birth weight (LBW) infants, leading to a rise in abdominal operations, notably for conditions like necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP). Ileostomies are common in newborns with surgical abdominal emergencies, yet a research gap exists in understanding causes, timing, and outcomes, especially neurological, following bowel obstruction in this population. Methods: A 15-year observational study at a tertiary care multispecialty hospital investigated 65 infants undergoing ileostomy. Variables included indications, gestational age, age at ileostomy, weight, closure timing, and outcomes. Exclusions comprised newborns with birth asphyxia, congenital malformations, and identified neurological deficit causes. Ethics clearance was obtained, and statistical analysis involved SPSS version 16.
Results: Total 65 babies underwent ileostomy from July 2006 to July 2021.Males were 48(73.8%) and females were 17(26.2). The most common indication for ileostomy was NEC (55.4%). Mean gestational age was 33weeks(±4 weeks SD), and mean age at ileostomy was 16 days.Mean weight at Ileostomy was 2.04 Kg(±0.96Kg). Outcomes showed 69.2% recovery, 20% mortality, 7.7% left against advice, and 6.1% transferred. Of those recovered, 33.8% experienced post-ileostomy complications which included conjugated hyperbiliribinemia, failure to thrive, prolapse, adhesions, wound dehiscence,etc. One-year neurological follow-up in 38 patients revealed 35 with normal development.
Conclusion:This comprehensive study sheds light on the complex landscape of neonates undergoing ileostomy, emphasizing the prominence of NEC and the impact of gestational age on outcomes. The positive neurological outcomes at one year underscore the need for continued monitoring in this vulnerable population. While promising, the study advocates for extended follow-ups and further exploration of long-term outcomes to refine perinatal management strategies
References
2. Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF, Iams JD, Romero R. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet (London, England) [Internet]. 2008 Jan 5 [cited 2021 Dec 14];371(9606):75. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC7134569/
3. Rees CM, Eaton S, Kiely EM, Wade AM, McHugh K, Pierro A. Peritoneal drainage or laparotomy for neonatal bowel perforation? A randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg [Internet]. 2008 Jul [cited 2021 Dec 14];248(1):44–51. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18580206/
4. Moss RL, Dimmitt RA, Barnhart DC, Sylvester KG, Brown RL, Powell DM, et al. Laparotomy versus peritoneal drainage for necrotizing enterocolitis and perforation. N Engl J Med [Internet]. 2006 May 25 [cited 2021 Dec 14];354(21):2225–34. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16723614/
5. Sola JE, Tepas JJ, Koniaris LG. Peritoneal drainage versus laparotomy for necrotizing enterocolitis and intestinal perforation: a meta-analysis. J Surg Res [Internet]. 2010 Jun 1 [cited 2021 Dec 14];161(1):95–100. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/19691973/
6. Singh M, Owen A, Gull S, Morabito A, Bianchi A. Surgery for intestinal perforation in preterm neonates: anastomosis vs stoma. J Pediatr Surg [Internet]. 2006 Apr [cited 2021 Dec 14];41(4):725–9. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16567184/
7. Paradiso VF, Briganti V, Oriolo L, Coletta R, Calisti A. Meconium obstruction in absence of cystic brosis in low birth weight infants: an emerging challenge from increasing survival. 2011 [cited 2021 Dec 14]; Available from: http://www. ijponline.net/content/37/1/55
8. Kliegman RM, Fanaroff AA. Necrotizing Enterocolitis. http://dx.doi.org/101056/ NEJM198404263101707 [Internet]. 2010 Jan 13 [cited 2021 Dec 14];310(17):1093–103. Available from: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/ 10.1056/ NEJM198404263101707
9. Ferrara F, Angotti R, Burgio A, Di Maggio G, Molinaro F, Messina M. Ileostomy in extremely low birth weight and premature neonates. Minerva Pediatr. 2013 Aug;65(4):411-5. PMID: 24051974.
10. Kargl S, Wagner O, Pumberger W. Ileostomy Complications in Infants less than 1500 grams – Frequent but Manageable. J Neonatal Surg [Internet]. 2017 Dec 31 [cited 2021 Dec 14];6(1):4. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC5224761/
11. Yang HB, Han JW, Youn JK, Oh C, Kim HY, Jung SE. The Optimal Timing of Enterostomy Closure in Extremely Low Birth Weight Patients for Acute Abdomen. Sci Reports 2018 81 [Internet]. 2018 Oct 24 [cited 2021 Dec 14];8(1):1–10. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-33351-9
12. Ramaswamy R, Hegab SM, Mugheri A, Mukattash G. Surgical treatment of necrotizing enterocolitis: Single-centre experience from Saudi Arabia. Ann Pediatr Surg. 2016;12(2):43–6.
13. Crealey M, Walsh M, Awadalla S, Murphy JF. Managing newborn ileostomies. Ir Med J. 2014 May;107(5):146-8. PMID: 24908859.
14. Weber TR, Tracy TF, Silen ML, Powell MA. Enterostomy and its closure in newborns. Arch Surg [Internet]. 1995 [cited 2021 Dec 15];130(5):534–7. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7748093/
15. Blakely ML, Lally KP, McDonald S, Brown RL, Barnhart DC, Ricketts RR, et al. Postoperative outcomes of extremely low birth-weight infants with necrotizing enterocolitis or isolated intestinal perforation: a prospective cohort study by the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Ann Surg [Internet]. 2005 Jun [cited 2021 Dec 15];241(6):984–94. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15912048/