HELIOSEAL WITH OR WITHOUT BONDING AGENT TO FIND THE ROLE OF BONDING AGENT IN FLUOROSED MOLARS - AN INVIVO STUDY
Main Article Content
Keywords
.
Abstract
AIM: To evaluate and compare the retention and longevity of non-fluoridated pit and fissure sealants (Helioseal) placed with and without use of bonding agents in young permanent molars affected by Dental Fluorosis in an interval of 1week, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months follow up. OBJECTIVE: To assess and compare the retention and longevity between HELIOSEAL pit and fissure sealants with bonding agent and without bonding agent in young permanent molar affected by dental fluorosis in an interval of 1 week, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months follow up.
MATERIAL AND METHODOLOGY: The Children were selected from the age group of 7-13 years of either gender. Written informed consent was procured from parents /guardians of all participants prior to the study. A clinical intervention was done among 7-13 years old children reporting to the Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry of Vivekananda dental college for women in Namakkal Dt., the study sample consists of 45 children.
RESULTS: Comparison of Group A (With Bonding Agent) and Group B (Without Bonding Agent) in HELIOSEAL Sealant with respect to its retention at 1 week, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months by Mann–Whitney U test. The Mean+SD retention was 1+0.00 after 1 week and 1-month follow-up while at 3 month it was1.18+0.39 and 1.04+0.20 for both the groups respectively. After 6 months follow-up Mean+SD retention was 1.40 + 0.58 and 1.11 + 0.31 in Helioseal with and without bonding agent groups respectively. After 12 months the Mean+SD was 1.89+0.83 and 1.46+0.72 for both the groups respectively.
CONCLUSION: HELIOSEAL (Group-IB) without bonding agent showed the higher retention rate when compared to HELIOSEAL (Group-IA) with bonding agent which was more evident after 6 and 12 months and was statistically significant.
References
2. Beauchamp, J., Caufield, P.W., Crall, J.J., Donly, K., Feigal, R., Gooch, B., Ismail, A., Kohn, W., Siegal, M., Simonsen, R., 2008. Evidence-based clinical recommendations for the use of pit-and fissure sealants: a report of the American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 139, 257–268.
3. Moore K, Avery DR. Dental materials. In: McDonald, Avery, Dean. editors. Dentistry for the child and adolescent. 8th ed. Mosby: 2004. p. 35
4. Mason PN, Ferrari M, Cagidiaco MC, Davidson CL. Shear bond strength of four dentinal adhesives applied in vivo and in vitro. J Dent 1996 May;24(3):217-222.
5. Lussi A, Duangthip D. Microleakage and penetration ability of resin sealant versus bonding system when applied following contamination. Pediatr Dent 2003;25:505-11.
6. Boksman L, McConnell RJ, McCutcheon-Jones EF. A 2-year clinical evaluation of two pit and fissure sealants placed with and without the use of a bonding agent. Quintessence International. 1993 Feb 1;24(2).
7. Ansari ZJ, Hashemi SM. Effect of enamel bonding agents on pit and fissure sealant retention in an isolated situation. Journal of Dentistry of Tehran University of Medical Sciences. 2008;5(4):156-60.
8. Sakkas C, Khomenko L, Trachuk I. A comparative study of clinical effectiveness of fissure sealing with and without bonding systems: 3-year results. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry. 2013 Apr 1;14(2):73-81.
9. Griffin SO, Jones K, Gray SK, Malvitz DM, Gooch BF. Exploring four-handed delivery and retention of resin-based sealants. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2008 Mar 1;139(3):281-9
10. Gupta N, Kathuria N, Gulati M, Mehta LK. Bonding: foundation of dentistry. J Innov Dent. 2011 Sep;1:60-.63
11. Feigal RJ, Musherure P, Gillespie B, Levy-Polack M, Quelhas I, Hebling J. Improved sealant retention with bonding agents: a clinical study of two-bottle and single-bottle systems. Journal of Dental Research. 2000 Nov;79(11):1850-6.
12. Maher MM, Elkashlan HI, El-Housseiny AA. Effectiveness of a self-etching adhesive on sealant retention in primary teeth. Pediatric dentistry. 2013 Jul 15;35(4):351-4.
13. Tandon V, Lingesha RT, Tangade PS, Tirth A, Pal SK, Lingesha CT, Arora V, Yadav V. Effect of Adhesive Application on Sealant Success: A Clinical Study of Fifth and Seventh Generation Adhesive Systems. Journal of dentistry (Tehran, Iran). 2015 Oct;12(10):712.
14. Mascarenhas AK, Nazar H, Al-Mutawaa S, Soparkar P. Effectiveness of primer and bond in sealant retention and caries prevention. Pediatric dentistry. 2008 Jan 1;30(1):25-8.
15. Ravikumar A, Khan SM. Prevalence of Dental Fluorosis among Primary School Children in Rural Areas of Tiruchengode block, Namakkal District, TN, India. J. Environ. Nanotechnol. 2015;4(1):67-75.
16. Prabakar J, John J, Arumugham IM, Kumar RP, Sakthi DS. Comparative evaluation of the viscosity and length of resin tags of conventional and hydrophilic pit and fissure sealants on permanent molars: An In vitro study. Contemporary clinical dentistry. 2018 Jul;9(3):388.
17. Pinar A, Sepet E, Aren G, Bolukbasi N, Ulukapi H, Turan N. Clinical performance of sealants with and without a bonding agent. Quintessence Int 2005; 36(5):355–60.
18. Zimmer S, Strafela N, Bastendorf KD, Bartsch A, Lang H, Barthel CR. Klinische Erfolgsraten von Fissurenversiegelungen mit Kompomer oder bis-GMA nach drei Jahren. Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnheilkunde. 2009;31:8-12.
19. Skrinjaric K, Vranic DN, Glavina D, Skrinjaric I. Heat‐treated glass ionomer cement fissure sealants: retention after 1 year follow‐up. International journal of paediatric dentistry. 2008 Sep;18(5):368-73.
20. Ganss C, Klimek J, Gleim A. One year clinical evaluation of the retention and quality of two fluoride releasing sealants. Clinical oral investigations. 1999 Dec 1;3(4):188-93.
21. Bargale S, Raju O. The retention of glass ionomer and light cure resin pit and fissure sealant using replica technique–An in vivo study. Internet J Dent Sci. 2011;9:37-41.
22. Nogourani MK, Janghorbani M, Khadem P, Jadidi Z, Jalali S. A 12-month clinical evaluation of pit-and-fissure sealants placed with and without etch-and- rinse and self-etch adhesive systems in newly-erupted teeth. Journal of Applied Oral Science. 2012 Jun;20(3):352-6