A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LEVOBUPIVACAINE AND LEVOBUPIVACAINE PLUS DEXMEDETOMIDINE IN CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL INFUSION FOR INTRA OPERATIVE ANALGESIA IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING OPEN RENAL TRANSPLANT SURGERIES
Main Article Content
Keywords
Epidural anaesthesia, L-bupivacaine, Dexmedetomidine
Abstract
Background and aims: General anaesthesia with epidural anaesthesia is preffered technique for renal transplant surgery as it provides superior muscle relaxation and controlled diaphragmatic movement during surgery with added advantage of stable hemodynamics and better perioperative field. Dexmedetomidine, a selective alpha-2 agonist has been found to be a better epidural adjuvant with more stable cardio-respiratory parameters, higher sedation score and prolongs postoperative analgesia.
Method: Prospective, randomised, double blind study. It was conducted on 80 adult ASA III or IV patients of either sex, scheduled for elective renal transplant surgery requiring general and epidural anaesthesia (during 2018-2020). Group-L received epidural bolus dose of 0.25% L-bupivacaine(10ml) followed by infusion of 0.125% L-bupivacaine @0.1ml/kg/hr, Group-LD received epidural bolus dose of 0.25% L- bupivacaine plus dexmedetomidine 10mcg(10 ml) followed by infusion of 0.125% L-bupivacaine plus dexmedetomidine 40mcg(20ml) @0.1ml/kg/hr. In both the groups intraoperative hemodynamics, depth of anaesthesia, requirement of inhalational agents and muscle relaxants, duration of postoperative analgesia and requirement of rescue analgesia were compared.
Result: There is statistically significant difference was observed in hemodynamics intraoperative as well as postoperatively (p<0.01). Requirement of inhalational agent and muscle relaxants was significantly less in group-LD(p<0.01). Duration of postoperative analgesia was prolonged and requirement of total no. of rescue analgesia were significantly less in group-LD(p<0.01). Postoperative sedation (Ramsay sedation scale) was higher initially in group-LD.
Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine better adjuvant to L-bupivacaine as it has longer duration of analgesia, hemodynamic stability, muscle relaxant and inhalational agent sparing effect and better sedation.
References
2. Bajwa SJ, Kaur J, Singh BA. A comparative evaluation of epidural and general anaesthetic technique for renal surgeries: A randomised prospective study. Indian journal of anaesthesia. 2014 Jul;58(4):410.
3. Suryavanshi VS, Sahu A, Harde M. Efficacy of combined epidural general anesthesia for attenuating haemodynamic responses in gynaecological laparoscopic surgery. International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research. 2016;3:1354-8.
4. Gupta K, Rastogi B, Gupta PK, Jain M, Gupta S, Mangla D. Epidural 0.5% levobupivacaine with dexmedetomidine versus fentanyl for vaginal hysterectomy: A prospective study. Indian Journal of pain. 2014 Sep 1;28(3):149.
5. Bajwa SJ, Kaur J, Singh A. A comparative evaluation of epidural and general anaesthetic technique for renal surgeries : A randomised prospective study. Indian J Anaesthesia 2014;58:410-5.
6. Bajwa SJS, Arora V, Kaur J, et al. Comparative evaluation of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl for epidural analgesia in lower limb orthopedic surgeries. Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia. 2011;5:365– 70.
7. Eappen S, Kissin I. Effect of subarachnoid bupivacaine block on anesthetic requirements for thiopental in rats. Anesthesiology 1998;88:1036–42.
8. Atia AM, Abdel-Rahman KA. Combined Thoracic Epidural with General Anesthesia vs. General Anesthesia Alone for Major Abdominal Surgery: Anesthetic Requirements and Stress Response. J Anesth Clin Res. 2016;7(616):2.
9. Usubiaga JE, Standaert F. The effects of local anesthetics on motor nerve terminals. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1968;159:353–61.
10. Jaakola ML, Salonen M, Lehtinen R, Scheinin H. The analgesic action of dexmedetomidine—a novel α2-adrenoceptor agonist—in healthy volunteers. Pain. 1991 Sep 1;46(3):281-5