ANALYSIS OF THE MORPHOLOGICAL FEATURES OF EARS IN HUMAN IDENTIFICATION– A FORENSIC STUDY

Main Article Content

Dr. Rajesh Naidu
Dr. Ravi Chander.D
Dr. Aishwarya M

Keywords

Earprints, Human identification, Forensic science

Abstract

Like fingerprints, ear prints too have been used in Forensic investigation since the nineteen sixties. Earprints are unique and are found in various crime scenes mostly burglaries. Outer portion of human ears are confound structure and offers wide range of versatility between different individuals. The present study was aimed to establish a method using the morphological features of ear by using photographs of ears for the identification

Abstract 118 | pdf Downloads 78

References

1. Bajpai M, Mishra N, Yadav P, Kumar S. Efficacy of lip prints for determination of sex and inter observer variability. Euro J Exp Bio. 2011;1:81–6.
2. Oepen, Der Identifizierungswert des menschliches Ohres, Paper Presented at the Institut fu¨r Rechtsmedizin der Universita¨t Marburg, 1971.
3. Meijerman L., van der Lugt C., Maat G. J. R. Cross-sectional anthropometric study of external ear. J Forensic Sci. 2007;52:286–293.
4. Alexander K. S., Stott D. J., Sivakumar B., Kang N. Morphometric study of the human ear. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010;20:1–7.
5. Murgod V, Angadi, Hallikerimath S, Kale A. Anthropometric study of external ear and its applicability in sex identification: assessed in an Indian sample. Australian J Forensic Sci. 2013; 45(4):431-444.
6. Shreshta RN, Banstala D, Nepal D, Baral P. Estimation of stature from nasal length. J Nepal Med Assoc. 2016; 55 (204):76-78.
7. Kautilya DV, Badkha P, Poothanathan P. Determination of stature and sex from anthropometry of the foot among South Indians. International Journal of Review in Life sciences.2013:3(2):22-26.
8. Sen J, Ghosh S. Estimation of stature from foot length and foot breadth among the Rajbanshi: An indigenous population of North Bengal. Forensic Sci. Int. 2008; 181:55.e1-55.e6.
9. Agnihotri AK, Purwar B, Googooley K, Agnihotri S, Jeebws N. Estimation of stature by foot length. J Forensic Legal Med. 2017;14:279-283.
10. Bajpai M, Pardhe N, Kumar M, Agrawal SA Comparative evaluation of Gustafson’s formula and new formula for age estimation in India—a forensic study. Prague Med Rep 116:203–209.
11. Ross AH, Ubelaker DH, Kimmerie EH. Implications of dimorphism, population variations and secular changes in estimating population affinity in Iberian Peninsula. Forensic Sci Int. 2011; 206:214e.
12. Stewart TD. Essentials of forensic anthropology: especially as developed in the United States. New York, NY: Charles C Thomas; 1979.
13. Singh J, Pathak RK. Morphometric sexual dimorphism of human sternum in a north Indian autopsy sample: Sexing efficacy of different statistical techniques and methods: a comparison with other sexing methods. Forensic Sci Int. 2013; 228:174.e1-174.e10.
14. Schuknecht HF. Congenital aural atresia. Laryngoscope. 1989; 99:908–917. doi: 10.1288/00005537-198909000-00004.
15. Hunnargi SA, Menezes RG, Kanchan T, Lobo SW, Binu VS, Uysal S, Kumar HR, Baral P, Herekar NG, Garg RK. Sexual dimorphism of the human sternum in a Maharashtrian population of India: A morphometric analysis. Leg Med. 2008; 10:6–10.
16. Singh P., Purkait R. A cephalometric study among sub caste groups Dangi and Ahirwar of Khurai block of Madhya Pradesh. Anthropologist. 2006;8:215–217.
17. Thapar R, Angadi PV, Hallikerimath S, Kale AD. Sex assessment using odontometry and cranial anthropometry: evaluation in an Indian sample. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2011 DOI: 10.1007/s12024-011-9247-4.
18. Sharma A., Kumar A., Singh P. Age dependant changes in lobules of human ear and its influence on individual identification. Ind J Forensic Med Toxicol. 2008; 2:1–3.