CLINICAL RELEVANCE OF CT VALUE ASSESSMENT: ENHANCING PRECISION IN URINARY STONE TREATMENT

Main Article Content

Muhammad Rizwan Farooqi
Muhammad Yasin Chaudhry
Rabia Noor
Wang Yu Jie

Keywords

Urinary stone disease, CT values, Chemical composition, Ethnic variations, Personalized treatment

Abstract

Background:


Urinary stone disease poses a significant health burden globally, impacting approximately 15% of the population. Ethnic variations in prevalence and the high recurrence rate underscore the complexity of this urological disorder. This study focuses on evaluating the role of CT values in discerning the chemical composition of upper urinary tract stones, offering insights into personalized treatment strategies.


Methods:


Conducted in Xinjiang, China, the retrospective study analyzed 120 patients with diverse demographics and stone types. Various surgical treatments were employed, and postoperatively, stone specimens underwent qualitative chemical composition analysis using infrared spectroscopy. CT values were recorded through scans conducted upon admission, and statistical analyses were performed to determine correlations between CT values and stone composition.


Results:


The study identified four types of pure stones and various mixed stones, with uric acid, calcium oxalate, hydroxyapatite, L-cystine, and struvite as the primary components. Significant differences in CT values were observed among pure uric acid stones, calcium oxalate stones, and hydroxyapatite stones. The average CT value to stone maximum transverse diameter ratio differentiated uric acid stones from calcium oxalate and hydroxyapatite stones. A CT value threshold of 550 HU exhibited high sensitivity (92.3%) and specificity (98.1%) in predicting pure uric acid stones.


Conclusion:


The study underscores the importance of considering ethnic variations in stone prevalence for accurate diagnosis. CT values, particularly in the soft tissue window, show promise in preoperative assessments, aiding differentiation between stone types. The average CT value to stone maximum transverse diameter ratio emerges as a useful metric, guiding treatment decisions based on stone hardness and structure. Despite inconclusive results in the bone window, the predictive accuracy of a 550 HU threshold for pure uric acid stones highlights the clinical utility of CT scans in enhancing diagnostic precision and personalized treatment strategies for urinary stone disease.

Abstract 149 | PDF Downloads 58

References

1. Romero, V., Akpinar, H., Assimos, D. G., & Kidney Stones Task Force of the American Urological Association. (2010). Kidney stones: a global picture of prevalence, incidence, and associated risk factors. Reviews in Urology, 12(2-3), e86.
2. Türk, C., Neisius, A., Petřík, A., Seitz, C., Tepeler, A., Thomas, K., ... & Knoll, T. (2016). EAU Guidelines on Urolithiasis. European Urology, 69(3), 475-482.
3. Pearle, M. S., Goldfarb, D. S., Assimos, D. G., Curhan, G., Denu-Ciocca, C. J., Matlaga, B. R., ... & American Urological Association. (2014). Medical management of kidney stones: AUA guideline. Journal of Urology, 192(2), 316-324.
4. Türk, C., Skolarikos, A., Neisius, A., Petřík, A., Seitz, C., Thomas, K., ... & Knoll, T. (2020). EAU Guidelines on Urolithiasis. European Urology, 78(4), 475-502.
5. Ferraro, P. M., Bargagli, M., Trinchieri, A., Gambaro, G., & Delvecchio, F. (2018). Dual-energy CT in the diagnosis of urinary calculi. Journal of Nephrology, 31(4), 513-520.
6. Rule, A. D., Bergstralh, E. J., Melton, L. J., Li, X., & Weaver, A. L. (2009). Kidney stones and the risk for chronic kidney disease. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 4(4), 804-811.
7. Antonelli, J. A., Maalouf, N. M., Pearle, M. S., Lotan, Y., & Urinary Stone Disease Research Network. (2018). Use of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey to calculate the impact of obesity and diabetes on cost and prevalence of urolithiasis in 2030. European Urology, 73(2), 243-250.
8. Strohmaier, W. L., Ciganek, L., Freudenthaler, M., Klimpfinger, M., Zabernigg, A., & Hubner, W. A. (2007). Late recurrence and spontaneous passage of renal and ureteral calculi. European Urology, 52(1), 154-160.
9. Eisner, B. H., Eisenberg, M. L., & Stoller, M. L. (2010). Relationship between body mass index and quantitative 24-hour urine chemistries in patients with nephrolithiasis. Urology, 75(6), 1289-1293.
10. Youssef, R. F., Neisius, A., Goldfarb, D. S., & Bird, V. G. (2016). Does obesity affect the outcomes of shockwave lithotripsy for renal stones? A matched pair analysis. Journal of Endourology, 30(5), 496-501.
11. Penniston, K. L., Antonelli, J. A., Viprakasit, D. P., Averch, T. D., Chahal, A. M., Chi, T.,& Pais, V. M. Jr. (2019). Validation and reliability of the endoscopic stone treatment step rating scale: a standardized evaluation tool for the endoscopic treatment of urolithiasis. Journal of Endourology, 33(10), 828-833.
12. Assimos, D., Krambeck, A., Miller, N. L., Monga, M., Murad, M. H., Nelson, C. P., ... & Wolf Jr, J. S. (2016). Surgical management of stones: American urological association/Endourological Society guideline, PART II. The Journal of Urology, 196(4), 1161-1169.
13. Skolarikos, A., Straub, M., Knoll, T., Sarica, K., Seitz, C., Petřík, A., ... & Türk, C. (2015). Metabolic evaluation and recurrence prevention for urinary stone patients: EAU guidelines. European Urology, 67(4), 750-763.
14. Lange, J. N., & Mufarrij, P. W. (2015). The impact of bariatric surgery on renal function. Seminars in Dialysis, 28(4), 461-465.
15. Canvasser, N. E., & Oredein-McCoy, O. (2019). Modern imaging of the urinary tract. Surgical Clinics, 99(1), 137-155.
16. Lemos, G. C., & Thielke, T. S. (2020). Hyperparathyroidism and kidney stones. In StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing.
17. Wright, A., Rukin, N., Smith, D., De la Rosette, J., & Somani, B. K. (2018). ‘Mini, ultra, micro’–nomenclature and cost of these new minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) techniques. Therapeutic Advances in Urology, 10(9), 263-268.
18. Miyaoka, R., Monga, M., & Usawachintachit, M. (2021). Future directions in endourology. World Journal of Urology, 39(1), 1-7.

Most read articles by the same author(s)