IMPACT OF NOVEL DENTAL IMPLANT SURFACE MODIFICATIONS ON OSSEOINTEGRATION AND EARLY HEALING

Main Article Content

Dr. Mahesh Suganna Golgeri
Dr. Ashish kumar
Dr. Priya Kumari
Dr. Pallavi Goyal
Dr. Abhijita Mohapatra
Dr.Farnaz Yasmin Shah

Keywords

Healing, Osseointegration, Dental Implant, clinical, bone

Abstract

By adjusting the etching and polishing steps, the surface roughness may be fine-tuned. Using a nanofiber-coated surface is another way to improve osteoconduction. Furthermore, we have shown that covering the titanium surface with nanofibers increases cell adherence. There are a number of methods being researched or suggested to enhance osseointegration by alteration of the implant surface. In addition to increasing and speeding up osseointegration, the use of current surfaces in dental clinical practice may also decrease peri-implant bone loss and enhance the likelihood of re-osseointegration of a damaged surface. In this work, we summarize the literature on the cellular-substrate interaction and in vivo investigations that evaluate the response to these new surfaces. Type I collagen (Koken Co. Tokyo, Japan), polylactic acid (100,000 Da, Aldrich Chemical Company, Inc., St. Louis, U.S.), and 1,1,1,3,3- hexafluoro-2-propanol (HFP, Aldrich Chemical Company, Inc., St. Louis, U.S.) were all employed in the electrospinning process. In addition to increasing and speeding up osseointegration, the use of current surfaces in dental clinical practice may also decrease peri-implant bone loss and enhance the likelihood of re-osseointegration of a damaged surface. An innovative approach to improving osseointegration with the bone regeneration concept is to use functionalized nanofibers as a surface modification for dental implants.

Abstract 101 | pdf Downloads 20

References

1. Rahimi, Siti & Fazrina, Tengku & Tengku Mohd Ariff, Tengku Fazrina & Hafizah, Nur & Kamar Affendi, Nur Hafizah & Ahmad, Rohana. (2022). Surface Modifications of Dental Implant and its Clinical Performance: A Review. Compendium of Oral Science. 9. 2022. 10.24191/cos.v9i1.16907.
2. Meng, Hsiu-Wan & Chien, Esther & Chien, Hua Hong (Ben). (2016). Dental implant bioactive surface modifications and their effects on osseointegration: A review. Biomarker Research. 4. 10.1186/s40364-016-0078-z.
3. Smeets, Ralf & Stadlinger, Bernd & Schwarz, Frank & Beck-Broichsitter, Benedicta & Jung, Ole & Precht, Clarissa & Kloss, Frank & Gröbe, Alexander & Heiland, Max & Ebker, Tobias. (2016). Impact of Dental Implant Surface Modifications on Osseointegration. BioMed Research International. 2016. 1-16. 10.1155/2016/6285620.
4. Kligman, Stefanie & Ren, Zhi & Chung, Chun-Hsi & Perillo, Michael & Chang, Yu-Cheng & Koo, Hyun & Zheng, Zhong & Li, Chenshuang. (2021). The Impact of Dental Implant Surface Modifications on Osseointegration and Biofilm Formation. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 10. 1641. 10.3390/jcm10081641.
5. Sethi, Sahil & Swarnakar, Arka & Hazarika, Pratyushman & Pandey, Sujata & Mahajan, Bela & Kumar, Pramod. (2023). Journal of Population Therapeutics & Clinical Pharmacology IMPACT OF NOVEL DENTAL IMPLANT SURFACE MODIFICATIONS ON OSSEO INTEGRATION AND EARLY HEALING. 786-792. 10.53555/jptcp.v30i16.2576.
6. Thalji GN, Nares S, Cooper LF. Early molecular assessment of osseointegration in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25:1273-1285.
7. Schwarz F, Herten M, Sager M, et al. Histological and immunohistochemical analysis of initial and early osseous integration at chemically modified and conventional SLA titanium implants: preliminary results of a pilot study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18:481-488.
8. Bosshardt DD, Salvi GE, Huynh-Ba G, et al. The role of bone debris in early healing adjacent to hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in man. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22:357-364.
9. Lang NP, Salvi GE, Huynh-Ba G, et al. Early osseointegration to hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22:349-356.
10. Pellegrini G, Seol YJ, Gruber R, et al. Pre-clinical models for oral and periodontal reconstructive therapies. J Dent Res. 2009;88:1065-1076. 20. Davies JE. Understanding peri-implant endosseous healing. J Dent Educ. 2003;67:932-949.
11. Goiato MC, Dos Santos DM, Jr Santiago JF, et al. Longevity of dental implants in type IV bone: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;43:1108-1116.
12. Sun HL, Huang C, Wu YR, et al. Failure rates of short (≤10 mm) dental implants and factors influencing their failure: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011;26:816-825.
13. . Guarnieri R, Placella R, Testarelli L, Iorio-Siciliano V, Grande M. Clinical, radiographic, and esthetic evaluation of Immediately loaded laser microtextured implants placed into fresh extraction sockets in the anterior maxilla: a 2-Year retrospective multicentric study. Implant Dent 2014; 23: 144–154.
14. von Wilmowsky C, Schwarz S, Kerl J M et al. Reconstruction of a mandibular defect with autogenous, autoclaved bone grafts and tissue engineering: an in vivo pilot study. J Biomed Mater Res A 2010; 93: 1510–1518.
15. Esposito M, Murray-Curtis L, Grusovin M, Coulthard P, Worthington H. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007; 17: CD003815. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 7: CD003815.

Most read articles by the same author(s)