Main Article Content

Dr Daya Shankar
Dr Anuj Kumar Choudhary
Dr Ravi Anjan
Dr Medha
Dr Niharika
Dr Awanindra kumar Jha


Dentist perspective, FPD, Implant, RPD, Single tooth replacement


The study aimed to analyze the dentists of North Bihar region about different treatment modalities for replacement of a single missing tooth and the factors that would affect their choices. The study concluded that fixed partial denture is the most common procedure in patient’s perspective to restore a single tooth gap. Dentist educational training, patient oral factors affect the decision-making process. Dentist of various age groups had difference in their preference from the prosthesis like esthetic and function. There was no significant difference between the preferred choice of males and females Fixed partial denture is the most common procedure in dentist perspective to restore a single tooth gap. There is a need to upgrade dentist with educational training regarding all the available options as well as their advantages and disadvantages, the final call should be made keeping all the factors in mind and whatever is best for the concerned patient.

Abstract 131 | Pdf Downloads 64


1. Lombardi RE. The principal of visual perception and their clinical application to denture esthetics. J Prosthet Dent. 1973; 29: 358–382
2. Kern BE. Anthropometric parameters of tooth selection. J Prosthet Dent. 1967; 17:431–437
3. Charles M, Heartwell JR, Rahn AO. Syllabus of complete denture, IV edn. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia.1986; pp 256–260
4. Frush JP, Fisher RD (1956) How dentogenic interpret the personality factor. J Prosthet Dent. 1956; 6:441–449
5. James.I.Kretzschmar. Natural tooth pontic. Am. Dent. Assoc. Vol132, no 11,1552-1553.
6. Chan R.W, Tseng T.N. Single tooth replacement-Expanded treatment options. Aus Dent J 1994;39:137–149.
7. Priest G.F. Failure rates of restorations for single-tooth replacement. Int J Prosthodont1996;9:38-45.
8. Al-Shammari, K. F., Al-Ansari, J. M., Al-Khabbaz, A. K., Nociti, F. H. Jr & Wang, H. L. Factors associated with implant recommendation for single-tooth replacement. Implant Dentistry.2005; 14, 201–208.
9. Salinas T.J, Block M.S, Sadan A. Fixed partial denture or single-tooth implant restoration? Statistical considerations for sequencing and treatment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;62:2–16.
10. Bragger U, Krenander P, Lang NP. Economic aspects of single-tooth replacement. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 16, 2005; 335–341
11. Thomas J. Salinas, Steven E. Eckert, In Patients Requiring Single Tooth Replacement, What Are the Outcomes of Implant- as Compared to Tooth-Supported Restorations? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22(SUPPL):71–95.
12. Cosyn J, Raes S, De Meyer S, Raes F, Buyl R, Coomans D, De Bruyn H. An analysis of the decision-making process for single implant treatment in general practice. J Clin Periodontol 2012; 39: 166–172.
13. Pommer, B., Zechner, W., Watzak, G., Ulm, C., Watzek, G. & Tepper, G. (2011a) Progress and trends in patients’ mindset on dental implants.II: implant acceptance, patient-perceived costs and patient satisfaction. Clinical Oral Implants Research 22, 106–112.
14. Younhee Kim, Sun-Young Park, Sung-Hee Oh, YeaJi Jung, Ji-Min Kim, Soo-Yeon Yoo, Seong-Kyun Kim, Economic Evaluation of Single-Tooth Replacement: Dental Implant Versus Fixed Partial Denture Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29:600–607.
15. Trovik, T. A., Klock, K. S. & Haugejorden, O. (2002b) Predictors of Norwegian adult patients’ perceived need for replacement of teeth at the time of extraction. Community Dental Health.2002; 19, 79–85.

Most read articles by the same author(s)