PRESCRIBING COMPETENCY OF MEDICAL STUDENTS: NATIONAL SURVEY OF MEDICAL EDUCATION LEADERS

Main Article Content

Jiayu Liu
SherWin Wong
Gary Foster
Anne Holbrook

Keywords

Prescribing Competency, Medical Education, Survey, Canada, Medication Safety

Abstract

Evidence suggests that newly licensed physicians are not adequately prepared to prescribe medications safely. There is currently no national pre-licensure prescribing competency assessment required in North America. This study’s purpose was to survey Canadian medical school leaders for their interest in and perceived need for a nation-wide prescribing assessment for final year medical students.


Method


In spring of 2015, surveys were disseminated online to medical education leaders in all 17 Canadian medical schools. The survey included questions on perceived medication prescribing competency in medical schools, and interest in integration of a national assessment into medical school curricula and licensing.


Results


372 (34.6 %) faculty from all 17 Canadian medical schools responded. 277 (74.5%) respondents were residency directors, 33 (8.9%) vice deans of medical education or equivalent, and 62 (16.7%) clerkship coordinators. Faculty judged 23.4% (SD 22.9%) of their own graduates’ prescribing knowledge to be unsatisfactory and 131 (44.8%) felt obligated to provide close supervision to more than a third of their new residents due to prescribing concerns. 239 (73.0%) believed that an assessment process would improve their graduates’ quality, 262 (80.4%) thought it should be incorporated into their medical school curricula and 248 (76.0%) into the national licensing process. Except in regards to close supervision due to concerns, there were no significant differences between schools’ responses.


Conclusions


Amongst Canadian medical school leadership, there is a perceived inadequacy in medical student prescribing competency as well as support for a standardized prescribing competency assessment in curricula and licensing processes.

Abstract 1111 | pdf Downloads 132

References

1. Canadian Institute for Health Information. Prescribed Drug Spending in Canada, 2012: A Focus on Public Drug Programs. Ottawa: Author; 2014. Available at: https://secure.cihi.ca/free_products/Prescribed_Drug_Spending_in_Canada_EN.pdf.
2. Health Canada. Prescription Drug List. Ottawa: Author; 2015. Available at: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/dhp-mps/prodpharma/pdl-ord/pdl_list_fin_ord-eng.php.
3. Snow T. NHS expenditure on prescribed medicines up by 7.6%, with 15.1% increase in hospital sector. Pharmaceutic J 2014. Available at: http://www.pharmaceutical-journal.com/news-and-analysis/nhs-expenditure-on-prescribed-medicines-up-by-76-with-151-increase-in-hospital-sector/20067182.article.
4. Street-Porter J. We need to wean ourselves off prescription drugs. Independent; 2015. Available at: http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/with-one-billion-prescriptions-written-every-year-it-s-time-to-wean-ourselves-off-the-drugs-10254599.html.
5. Sifferlin A. Americans spent a record amount on medicine in 2014. TIME; 2015. Available at: http://time.com/3819889/medicine-spending/.
6. Berkrot B. U.S. prescription drug spending to hit $400 billion a year by 2020: IMS. Reuters; 2016. Available at: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-usa-drugspending-idUSKCN0XB08Q.
7. Baker G, Norton P, Flintoft V et al. The Canadian Adverse Events Study: the incidence of adverse events among hospital patients in Canada. CMAJ 2004;170(11):1678–86.
8. Lazarou J, Pomeranz B, Corey P. Incidence of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Survey Anesthesiol 1999;43(1):53–54.
9. Gurwitz J, Field T, Avorn J, et al. Incidence and preventability of adverse drug events in nursing homes. Am J Med 2000;109(2):87–94.
10. Sultana J, Cutroneo P, Trifirò G. Clinical and economic burden of adverse drug reactions. J Pharmacol Pharmacotherap 2013;4(5):73–77.
11. Bouvy J, De Bruin M, Koopmanschap M. Epidemiology of Adverse Drug Reactions in Europe: A Review of Recent Observational Studies. Drug Safety 2015;38(5):437–53.
12. The Canadian Medical Protective Association. Medication management, quality healthcare - Safety of care. CMPA; 2015. Available at: https://www.cmpa-acpm.ca/-/medication-management-quality-healthcare.
13. Association of American Medical Colleges. Core Entrustable Professional Activities for Entering Residency: Faculty and Learners’ Guide. Association of American Medical Colleges; 2014. Available at: https://members.aamc.org/eweb/upload/Core%20EPA%20 Faculty%20and%20Learner%20Guide.pdf.
14. Royal Pharmaceutical Society. A Competency Framework for all Prescribers. Royal Pharmaceutical Society; 2016. Available at: https://www.rpharms.com/Portals/0/RPS%20document%20library/Open%20access/Profes-sional%20standards/Prescribing%20competency%20framework/prescribing-competency-framework.pdf.
15. Young H. Lack of pharmacological training causes overuse and misuse of drugs. CMAJ 2007;178(3):276–76.
16. Ryan C, Ross, S Davey, P et al. Prevalence and causes of prescription errors: The Prescribing Outcomes for Trainee Doctors Engaged in Clinical Training (PROTECT) Study. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(1):e79802
17. Dornan T, Ashcroft D, Heathfield H et al. An in-depth investigation into causes of prescribing errors by foundation trainees in relation to their medical education: EQUIP study. General Medical Council, 2009. Available at: https://www.gmc-uk.org/FINAL_Re-port_prevalence_and_causes_of_prescribing_errors.pdf_28935150.pdf.
18. Mucklow J, Bollington L, Maxwell S. Assessing prescribing competence. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2012;74(4):632–39.
19. Maxwell S, Cameron I, Webb D. Prescribing safety: ensuring that new graduates are prepared. The Lancet; 2015. Available at: http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(14)62339-4/fulltext.
20. Sayburn A. Preparing to prescribe: Lessons from the prescribing safety assessment. Student BMJ; 2015. Available at: http://student.bmj.com/student/view-article.html?id=sbmj.h316.
21. Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology: Program Directors. Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, 2017. Available at: http://www.royalcollege.ca/rcsite/documents/arps/clin-pharmacology-e.
22. British Pharmacological Society. Clinical Pharmacology: A Dynamic Medical Specialty Essential for UK Healthcare. British Pharmacological Society; 2015. Available at: https://www.bps.ac.uk/BPSMemberPortal/media/BPSWebsite/Clinical-Pharmacology-A-dynamic-medical-speciality-essential-for-UK-Healthcare.pdf.
23. Frank J, Snell L, Sherbino J. The Draft CanMEDS 2015 Physician Competency Framework. Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, 2015. Available at: http://www.royalcollege.ca/portal/page/portal/rc/common/documents/canmeds/framework/canmeds2015_framework_series_IV_e.pdf.
24. Qayyum F, Wright M, Lee M, Leung C, Sada A, Hol-brook A. Medical student opinions on their training in clinical pharmacology and therapeutics. McMaster Univers Med J 2015;9(1):4–8.
25. Wu V, Chan O, Maxwell S, et al. Development and validation of the McMaster Prescribing Competency Assessment for Medical Trainees (MacPCA). J Popul Therapeut Clin Pharmacol 2015;22(2):173–78.
26. SurveyMonkey Plans and Pricing. SurveyMonkey, 2015. Available at: https://www.surveymonkey.com/pricing/.
27. Raosoft. Sample Size Calculator by Raosoft, Inc. Raosoft, 2015. Available at: http://www.raosoft.com/samplesize.html.
28. Shih T, Fan X. Comparing response rates in e-mail and paper surveys: A meta-analysis. Ed Res Rev 2009;4(1):26–40.
29. Grava-Gubins I, Scott S. Effects of various methodologic strategies Survey response rates among Canadian physicians and physicians-in-training. Can Fam Phys 2008;54(10):1424–30.
30. National Physician Survey. Response Rates. NPS; 2014. Available at: http://nationalphysiciansurvey.ca/surveys/2014-survey/response-rates/.
31. The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. CanMEDS Framework. The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; 2017. Available at: http://www.royalcollege.ca/rcsite/canmeds/canmeds-framework-e.

Most read articles by the same author(s)