3D PRINTING ETHICAL PERSPECTIVES ON NURSING SCIENCE: AN INTEGRATIVE LITERATURE REVIEW

Main Article Content

Ronnell Dela Rosa

Keywords

Ethical Practice, 3D Printing, Integrative Review, Nursing Science

Abstract

3D printing has revolutionized healthcare in particular to medical and nursing sciences. 3D printing often uses additive manufacturing.  3D printing could transform nursing education, research, and caring encounters using new technologies raise ethical difficulties and non-implementing policies to a model development and innovations.  This study focuses on the literature review of ethical undertaking of 3D printing in nursing science. It uses the framework of Knaff and Whittemore (2005) on Integrative literature reviews using PRISMA as illustration of analysis. Proquest, Elsevier, Hindawi, CINAHL, PubMed, Medline Plus, and Ebsco searched 3D printing ethical research. "3D Printing," "Ethics in 3D Printing," "Prototyping," and "Rapid Manufacturing" were searched for 2010 English articles. Eight studies were identified and determined relevant to this literature review. This study also discussed merging empirical and theoretical reporting, and documentation assessed policy. Focused group discussions and Roundtable Discussions tied it to current Intellectual Property Rights printing law and 3rd printing ethics. Study review experts/validators' matrix and selection criteria formed a rubric. Members checking were facilitated. Results recommended assessment of nursing encounter on the use of 3D printing technologies, their knowledge and awareness are both vital. Also, this may be served as platform institutionally to create a model, program and reconstitute a particular policy to ensure ethical conformation to the nursing science whether in education, service and community nursing works.

Abstract 325 | pdf Downloads 142

References

1. Chua, C. K., Yeong, W. Y., & Lim, C. S. (2017). Legal and ethical implications of additive manufacturing: A snapshot from Singapore. Virtual and Physical Prototyping, 12(2), 15716.
2. Asif A, Lee E, Caputo M, et al. Role of 3D printing technology in paediatric teaching and training: a systematic review. BMJ Paediatrics Open 2021;5:e001050. doi:10.1136/ bmjpo-2021001050
3. Cornwall, J. (2016). The ethics of 3D-printing copies of bodies donated for medical education and research: What is there to worry about? Australasian Medical Journal, 8–11. https://doi.org/10.4066/amj.2015.2567
4. Dela Rosa, R. and Castro, J. Praxes, Issues and Challenges in Mainstreaming Gender and Development at Senior High School. International Journal of Arts and Social Science. ISSN 2581-7922. Vol. 4 Issue 4. July – August 2021.
5. Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal. 2009; 26(2):91-108.
6. Ibanga, I. J., Bamidele, O., Romero, C. B., Mastul, A. H., Solomon, Y., & Jayme, C. B. (2023). Revolutionizing Healthcare with 3D/ 4D Printing and Smart Materials. Engineering Science Letter, 2(01), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.56741/esl.v2i01.291
7. Li, Phoebe, Stephen Mellor, James Griffin, Charlotte Waelde, Liang Hao, Richard Everson (2014). ”Intellectual Property and 3D Printing: A Case Study on 3D Chocolate Printing.”, 2014. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice. March 2014.
8. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med 6(7): e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed 1000097
9. Neely, E. L. (2015). The Risks of Revolution: Ethical Dilemmas in 3D Printing from a US Perspective. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22(5), 1285–1297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9707-4
10. Oducado, R. M. F., Tuppal. C. P., Estoque, H. V., Sadang, J. M., Superio. D. L., Real. D. V.C., Roa, M. N. Y., Malaga, X. G.,Quiros, J. D., Fajardo, M. T. R. & Dela Rosa, R.D. (2021). Uso de Internet y la alfabetización en eSalud con temor al COVID-19 entre estudiantes de enfermería en Filipinas International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation (IJERI), 15, 487-502 . ISSN: 2386-4303 DOI https://doi.org/10.46661/ijeri.5520
11. Rajam, Shardha; Adya Jha (2018). 3D Printing-An Analysis of Liabilities and Potential Benefits Within the Indian Legal Framework. NUJS Law Review.
12. Reyes, Aubrey Nichole C, Patrick Samuel Ngo (2017). The World of 3D Printing: A Test of Applicability of Amending RA 8293 on Patent Infringement. Paper presented at DLSU Research Congress 2017, DeLa Salle University, Manila, Philippines. June 20-22, 2017. Retrieved from: https://www.dlsu.edu.ph>uploads>pdf>conferences>HCT>HCT-1-104
13. Rosa RDD (2018) From Station to Bedside and Beyond: Clinical Nursing Workflow Processes in Cardiovascular and Oncology Units. J Res Development 5: 161. doi: 10.4172/2311- 3278.1000161.
14. Soriano, G. and Dela Rosa, R. (2021). Caring Behaviors and Spiritual Care Competencies of Nurses in Selected Hospitals in Manila, Philippines: A Correlational Study. Wesleyan Scientific Review.Vol.1 Number1.
15. Souza MT, Silva MD, Carvalho R. Integrative review: what is it? How to do it? Einstein (São Paulo). 2010;8(1):102-6
16. Vaz, V. M., & Kumar, L. (2021). 3D Printing as a Promising Tool in Personalized Medicine. Aaps Pharmscitech, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-020-01905-8
17. Vincent, J. (2014, September 1). Three quarters of the Ikea catalogue is CGI. The Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/tech/three-quarters-of-the-ikea-catalogue-is-cgi9704120.html
18. Whittemore R, Knafl K. The integrative review: updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2005; 52(5).
19. Ye Z, Dun A, Jiang H, Nie C, Zhao S, Wang T, Zhai J. The role of 3D printed models in the teaching of human anatomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med Educ. 2020 Sep 29;20(1):335. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02242-x. PMID: 32993608; PMCID: PMC7523371.