Rehabilitation of patient with double crown system: A Marburg denture

Main Article Content

Rakhi Shinde
Department of Prosthodontics and crown & Bridge, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, Datta Meghe institute of Higher Education &Research, India.

Anjali Bhoyar
Professor Department of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, Datta Meghe institute of Higher Education &Research, India.

Seema Sathe
Professor & Head - Department of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, Datta Meghe institute of Higher Education &Research, India

Poorvi Jain
Post Graduate Student - Department of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital , Datta Meghe institute of Higher Education &Research, India.

Keywords

double, frequently, telescoping, century

Abstract

Telescopic crowns were initially created as retainers for detachable partial dentures at the turn of the 20th century (RPDs). Along with these names, they are frequently referred to as a double crown, crown and sleeve coping (CSC), or Konuskrone, a German term for a design in the form of a cone (Wentz HJ & Lehmann KM, 1998). These crowns are constructed of an inner, main telescopic coping that is permanently bonded to an abutment and a corresponding secondary telescoping crown that is directly attached to a detachable prosthesis. Copings were developed to hold and stabilise the secondary crown and protect the abutment from thermal irritants and tooth decay. The secondary crown fits into the primary coping to create a telescoping unit that serves as an anchor for the remaining dentition ( Langer Y & Langer A, 2000).

Abstract 199 | pdf Downloads 188

References

1. Wenz HJ, Lehmann KM. A telescopic crown concept for the restoration of the partially edentulous arch: the Marburg double crown system. Int J Prosthodont. 1998;11(6):541-50.
2. Langer Y, Langer A. Tooth-supported telescopic prostheses in compromised dentitions: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;84(2):129-32. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2000.108026.
3. Wenz HJ, Hertrampf K, Lehmann KM. Clinical longevity of removable partial dentures retained by telescopic crowns: Outcome of the double crown with clearance fit. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14(3):207-13.
4. Langer A. Telescope retainers and their clinical application. J Prosthet Dent. 1980;44(5):516-22. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(80)90070-0.
5. Yalisove IL. Crown and sleeve-coping retainers for removable partial prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent. 1966;16(6):1069-85. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(66)90173-9.
6. Pisulkar SK, Agrawal R, Belkhode V, Nimonkar S, Borle A, Godbole SR. Perception of Buccal Corridor Space on Smile Aesthetics among Specialty Dentist and Layperson. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2019;9(5):499-504. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_2_19.
7. Wray L. The diabetic patient and dental treatment: an update. Br Dent J. 2011 Sep 9;211(5):209-15. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2011.724.
8. Crum RJ, Loiselle RJ. Oral perception and proprioception: A review of the literature and its significance to prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent. 1972;28(2):215-30. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(72)90141-2.
9. Ohkawa S, Okane H, Nagasawa T, Tsuru H. Changes in retention of various telescope crown assemblies over long-term use. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;64(2):153-8. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(90)90170-h.
10. Prakash V, Parkash H, Gupta R. Fixed removable prosthesis employing Marburg double crown system. The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society. 2008;8(1):59-62.
11. Kalucha S, Mishra KK, Gedam SR. Noncompliance in psychosis. Journal of Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences University. 2017;12(1):61-65. 12. Eggbeer D, Bibb R, Williams R. The computer-aided design and rapid prototyping fabrication of removable partial denture frameworks. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2005;219(3):195-202. doi: 10.1243/095441105X9372.
13. PuroHit HS, PiSulKar SK, GoDbole SD, KAMBALA SS, MISTRY RA. Marburg Denture System: Aiming to Preserve the Proprioception-A Case Report. Journal of Clinical & Diagnostic Research. 2020 Oct 1;14(10). DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2020/44839.14099
14. Singh K, Gupta N. Telescopic Denture-A Treatment Modality for Minimizing the Conventional Removable Complete Denture Problems: A Case Report. Journal of Clinical & Diagnostic Research. 2012;6(6).
15. Preiskel HW. Overdentures made easy: a guide to implant and root supported prostheses. Quintessence Publishing Company; 1996.
16. Laufer BZ, Gross M. Splinting osseointegrated implants and natural teeth in rehabilitation of partially edentulous patients. Part II: principles and applications. J Oral Rehabil. 1998;25(1):69-80. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.1998.00583.x.
17. Besimo C, Graber G. A new concept of overdentures with telescope crowns on osseointegrated implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1994;14(6):486-95.

Article Sidebar

pdf
Published
Jun 24, 2023
DOI https://doi.org/10.47750/jptcp.2023.30.16.031

Article Details

How to Cite
Rakhi Shinde, Anjali Bhoyar, Seema Sathe, & Poorvi Jain. (2023). Rehabilitation of patient with double crown system: A Marburg denture. Journal of Population Therapeutics and Clinical Pharmacology, 30(16), 241–246. https://doi.org/10.47750/jptcp.2023.30.16.031
Issue
Vol. 30 No. 16 (2023): JPTCP
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

All articles published in JPTCP  are licensed under Copyright Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.