Potential role for the conservative management of warfare penetrating Shrapnel and bullets to the abdomen: an observational study

Main Article Content

M Ezzedien Rabie
Mansour Al Asmari
Abdelelah Hummadi
Yahia Al Malki
Ahmad Abu Al Yazeed
Ahmad Al Hazmi
Yasser Almahdi

Keywords

Abstract

Background: the conservative management of selected cases of penetrating Shrapnel and bullet
injuries to the abdomen, inflicted in the warzone, has not been previously reported.
Material and methods: Patients, who sustained penetrating bullets or Shrapnel abdominal injuries in
the battle field, were included in the study.
Results: 39 consecutive patients were included in the study. They were all males with a mean age of
31 years. 4 (10.3%) patients had bullet injury, while 35 (89.7%) had Shrapnel injury. The injury was
localized to the abdomen in only two cases (5%), while it involved the abdomen as well as other sites
in the remaining 37 patients (95%). 13 patients (33.3%) underwent laparotomy in the first line hospital,
while 26 (66.7%) were referred to our hospital without laparotomy. Out of these 13 laparotomies, 10
(77%) were positive therapeutic, while 3 (23%) were positive non therapeutic. In our hospital, 10
(77%) out of these 13 patients needed only continued post operative care while 3(23%) needed
relaparotomy. In the 26 patients who were referred to our hospital without laparotomy, 4 (15.4%)
needed laparotomy, while conservative management was followed in 22(84.6%) with only one failure.
All laparotomies performed in our hospital were positive therapeutic ones. At the end of the study,
patients were contacted by phone. 23 patients, were found in good health, two patients had minor
complaints, while. 14 could not be contacted.
Conclusion: a subset of patients with penetrating Shrapnel and bullet injury to the abdomen, who
show no frank indication for laparotomy, could be treated conservatively. The clinical evaluation
should be augmented with contrast enhanced abdominal CT scan. Preparedness to operate if conditions
change, should be an indispensable part of the treatment plan. By adopting this policy, a reduction in
the rates of positive non therapeutic or negative laparotomy, could be anticipated.

Abstract 123 | pdf Downloads 50

References

1. Velmahos GC, Demetriades D, Cornwell III EE. Transpelvic gunshot wounds: Routine laparotomy or selective management. World J Surg 1998; 22: 1034-1038.
2. Khan S, Pardhan A, Bawa T, Haroon N. Conservative management of an abdominal gunshot injury with a peritoneal breach: wisdom or absurdity? BMJ Case Rep.2013 Nov 22;2013. Pii: bcr2013201593. Doi: 10.1136/bcr-2013-201593.
3. Bennett JD. Abdominal surgery in war-the early story. J R Soc Med. 1991 Sep;84(9):554-7.
4. Rizzi M. History of penetrating abdominal wounds. Rev Med Urug 2009; 25 (4): 249-263.
5. Vujovic B, Mazlagic D. Epidemiology and surgical management of abdominal war injuries in Sarajevo: State Hospital of Sarajevo experience. Prehosp Disaster Med. 1994 AprJun;9(2 Suppl 1):S29-34. PMID: 10155515.
6. Dawidson I, Miller E, Litwin MS. Gunshot wounds of the abdomen. A review of 277 cases. Arch Surg. 1976 Aug;111(8):862-5. PMID: 942296
7. Shaftan GW. Indications for operation in abdominal trauma. Am J Surg. 1960;99: 657-664 DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(60)90010-6.
8. Shaftan GW. J Trauma. 1969 Dec;9(12):1026-8. Selective conservatism in penetrating abdominal
trauma.
9. Liebenberg ND, Maasch AJ. Penetrating abdominal wounds-a prospective trial of conservative treatment based on physical signs. S Afr Med J. 1988 Sep 3;74(5):231-3. PMID: 3413612.
10. Muckart DJ, Abdool-Carrim AT, King B. Selective conservative management of abdominal gunshot wounds: a prospective study. Br J Surg. 1990 Jun;77(6):652-5. PMID: 2383733.
11. Demetriades D, Charalambides D, Lakhoo M, Pantanowitz D. Gunshot wound of the abdomen:
role of selective conservative management. Br J Surg. 1991 Feb;78(2):220-2. PMID: 2015480.
12. Karabulut R, Turkyilmaz Z, Sonmez K, Basaklar AC. Nonoperative management of gunshot injury
of abdomen in a 10-year-old boy. Indian J Surg. 2013 Jun;75(Suppl 1):166-7. Doi: 10.1007/s12262-012-0563-z. Epub 2012 Jun 16. PMID: 24426552.
13. Adesanya AA, Afolabi IR, da Rocha-Afodu JT. Civilian abdominal gunshot wounds in Lagos. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1998 Aug;43(4):230-4. PMID: 9735644.
14. Yanar H, Ozcinar B, Taviloglu K, Ertekin C, Guloglu R, Arabaci E. Selective conservative management of penetrating hollow viscus injuries: a report of three cases. Acta Chir Belg. 2010 Jul-Aug;110(4):479-83.
15. Singh AK, Sodickson A, Abujudeh H. Imaging of abdominal and pelvic injuries from the Boston
Marathon bombing. Emerg Radiol. 2016 Feb;23(1):35-9. Doi: 10.1007/s10140-015-1354-1. Epub 2015 Oct 7. PMID: 26445949.
16. Georgi BA , Massad M, Obeid M. Ballistic trauma to the abdomen: shell fragments versus bullets. J Trauma. 1991 May;31(5):711-5.
17. Saghafinia M, Nafissi N, Motamedi MR, Motamedi MH, Hashemzade M, Hayati Z, Panahi F. Assessment and outcome of 496 penetrating gastrointestinal warfare injuries. J R Army Med Corps. 2010 Mar;156(1):25-7. PMID: 20433101.
18. Klaue P, Franke S, Jaroschik K. The value of diagnostic peritoneal lavage in perforating abdominal injuries. Chirurg. 1981 Apr;52(4):237-40. PMID: 7227005.
19. Rabie ME, Binitie PO, Al-Sheri GY, Al-Qahtani MS. The selective conservative management of gunshot injury to the abdomen. Saudi Med J. 2004 Jul;25(7):944-7. PMID: 15235705.
20. M Ezzedien Rabie. Non-operative management of multiple penetrating fragments of the torso secondary to an explosion. Surgical Practice. 2008; 12:26–29.