Comparative Evaluation of Wound Healing Outcomes Between Reso-Pac® And Coe-PakTM following Conventional Gingivectomy

Gopika Gopikrishnan Nair; Sharath K. Shetty; Anita Kulloli; Santosh Martande; D.Gopalakrishnan; Shweta Kadam; Mariam Poulose; Bharath Kumar Ayyanahalli Matta

doi:10.47750/jptcp.2023.30.11.024

Gopika Gopikrishnan Nair

Department of Periodontology, Dr D.Y. Patil Dental College and Hospital, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, India.

Sharath K. Shetty

Department of Periodontology, Dr D.Y. Patil Dental College and Hospital, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, India.

Anita Kulloli

Department of Periodontology, Dr D.Y. Patil Dental College and Hospital, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, India.

Santosh Martande

Department of Periodontology, Dr D.Y. Patil Dental College and Hospital, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, India.

D.Gopalakrishnan

Department of Periodontology, Dr D.Y. Patil Dental College and Hospital, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, India.

Shweta Kadam

Department of Periodontology, Dr D.Y. Patil Dental College and Hospital, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, India.

Mariam Poulose

Department of Periodontology, Dr D.Y. Patil Dental College and Hospital, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, India.

Bharath Kumar Ayyanahalli Matta

Department of Periodontology, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, MAHE, Manipal, India.

Keywords

Gingivectomy, Periodontal dressings, Wound healing

Abstract

Background: The aim of this present study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of wound healing outcomes between Reso-Pac® and Coe-PakTM periodontal dressing following conventional gingivectomy.
Methods: Seven patients undergoing orthodontic treatment with the need for gingivectomy were considered for this study. The patients were randomized into test sites and control sites and the surgical sites were protected by Reso- Pac® and Coe-Pak TM periodontal dressing respectively. Landry’s healing index was used to evaluate the postoperative healing outcomes for both sites after 3, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days.
Results: The test site exhibited a median healing index score of 3(3-4) and the control site exhibited a median score of 3(2-3) on the 3rd postoperative day. There was a statistically significant difference between the test sites and control sites on the post-surgical 7th, and 14th days proving Reso-Pac® to be the ideal periodontal dressing to provide faster and superior healing compared to Coe-Pak TM periodontal dressing. Open wounds had been epithelized completely and replaced with new tissue on the 21st and 28th days. Hence, both sites noted similar healing outcomes on the 21st and 28th days, giving a median score of 5 (5-5) each, which was not statistically significant.
Conclusion: Reso-Pac® is an ideal periodontal dressing as it is easy to apply, and provides faster and superior wound healing when compared to Coe-Pak TM.

Abstract 392 | PDF Downloads 284

References

1. Kathariya R, Jain H, Jadhav T. To pack or not to pack: the current status of periodontal dressings. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater. 2015;13(2): e73-86.
2. Burke JF. Effects of inflammation on wound repair. J Dent Res. 1971;50(2):296-303.
3. Flores-de-Jacoby L, Mengel R. Conventional surgical procedures. Periodontol 2000. 1995;9:38-54.
4. Mohan, Harsh. Textbook of Pathology. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers, 2000.
5. Guo S, Dipietro LA. Factors affecting wound healing. J Dent Res. 2010;89(3):219-29.
6. Wikesjö UM, Nilvéus RE, Selvig KA. Significance of early healing events on the periodontal repair: a review. J Periodontol. 1992;63(3):158-65.
7. AN Savitha, Christopher S, Soumik B. Reso PackTM- A Novel Periodontal Dressing in Comparison with Coe-Pak: A Clinical Study. I J Pre Clin Dent Res 2015;2(1):32-37.
8. Frisch J, Bhaskar SN. Tissue response to eugenol-containing periodontal dressings. J Periodontol. 1967;38(5):402-8.
9. Pippi R. Post-Surgical Clinical Monitoring of Soft Tissue Wound Healing in Periodontal and Implant Surgery. Int J Med Sci. 2017 Jul 18;14(8):721-728.
10. Budisidharta, Y., Syaify, A., & Lastianny, S. (2020). The effects of zinc oxide non- eugenol and cellulose as periodontal dressings on open wounds after periodontal surgery. Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi), 53(1), 45-49.
11. Kumar MBV, Narayanan V, Jalaluddin M, Almalki SA, Dey SM, Sathe S. Assessment of Clinical Efficacy of Different Periodontal Dressing Materials on Wound Healing: A Comparative Study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019;20(8):896-900.
12. Gholami L, Ansari-Moghadam S, Sadeghi F et al. Clinical and Cytotoxic Comparison of Two Periodontal Dressings after Periodontal Flap Surgery. World J Dent 2019;10(1):7-13.
13. Raghavan SL, Panneerselvam E, Mudigonda SK, Raja KKVB. Protection of an intraoral surgical wound with a new dressing: a randomised controlled clinical trial. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;58(7):766-770.
14. Sachs HA, Farnoush A, Checchi L, Joseph CE. Current status of periodontal dressings. J Periodontol. 1984;55(12):689-96.
15. Kadam S, Kulloli A, Shetty SS, Martande SS, Nair G, Poulose M, Guruprasad M, Mehta V. Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Antibiotics incorporated Platelet Rich Fibrin Versus Platelet Rich Fibrin alone in the Treatment of Intrabony Defects. J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol Vol 30(2):e267–e274.

PDF

Published

May 13, 2023

DOI https://doi.org/10.47750/jptcp.2023.30.11.024

How to Cite

Gopika Gopikrishnan Nair, Sharath K. Shetty, Anita Kulloli, Santosh Martande, D.Gopalakrishnan, Shweta Kadam, Mariam Poulose, & Bharath Kumar Ayyanahalli Matta. (2023). Comparative Evaluation of Wound Healing Outcomes Between Reso-Pac® And Coe-PakTM following Conventional Gingivectomy. Journal of Population Therapeutics and Clinical Pharmacology, 30(11), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.47750/jptcp.2023.30.11.024