PREDICTIVE VALUE OF INFLAMMATORY HEMATOLOGICAL INDICES, REPRODUCTIVE AND PREGNANCY-RELATED FACTORS, AND BASELINE NEUROIMAGING FOR SHORT-TERM NEUROLOGICAL AND VISUAL OUTCOMES IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE ISCHEMIC STROKE
Main Article Content
Keywords
Acute Ischemic Stroke , Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII) , Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) , Neuroimaging Biomarkers
Abstract
Background: Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a heterogeneous neurological emergency influenced by systemic inflammatory cascades, biological sex, reproductive dynamics, and baseline vascular-neuroimaging markers. While individual risk markers have been studied, the integrated predictive capacity of inflammatory hematological indices, reproductive and pregnancy-related variables, and baseline neuroimaging parameters for short-term functional and visual outcomes remains to be fully elucidated.
Objective: To evaluate the predictive value of admission inflammatory hematological indices, reproductive/pregnancy-related factors, and baseline neuroimaging markers for short-term (90-day) neurological and visual outcomes in patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke.
Methods: This prospective cohort study evaluated 160 adult patients with acute ischemic stroke admitted at Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences. Admission inflammatory hematological indices—including the Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII), Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR), and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR)—were derived from baseline complete blood counts. A detailed reproductive and pregnancy-related history (parity, gravidity, history of preeclampsia/gestational hypertension, age at menarche, and oral contraceptive or hormone replacement therapy exposure) was compiled for female participants. Baseline non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) and CT angiography (CTA) parameters were recorded, including Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS), presence of dense vessel sign, clot burden score (CBS), and presence of posterior circulation or occipital lobe infarcts. The primary endpoint was 90-day favorable neurological outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0–2. The secondary endpoint was persistent visual deficit (visual field defects, cortical blindness, or diplopia) evaluated at 90 days. Multivariable logistic regression models were developed to evaluate independent predictive factors.
Results: Among 160 patients (mean age 58.4 ± 11.2 years; 52.5% female, n=84), 98 patients (61.3%) achieved a favorable 90-day neurological outcome (mRS≤2), while 62 patients (38.8%) experienced poor functional outcomes or mortality (mRS≥3). Persistent visual deficits were identified in 31 patients (19.4%). Baseline SII was significantly elevated in patients with poor 90-day functional outcomes (1342.8±482.1 vs. 628.4±214.6×109/L, p<0.001). Among female participants (n=84), a history of preeclampsia or gestational hypertension was significantly more prevalent in the poor outcome group (32.4% vs. 10.2%, p=0.012). Low baseline ASPECTS (≤7) (p<0.001) and posterior circulation/occipital infarct location (p<0.001) strongly correlated with adverse functional and visual recovery. Multivariable logistic regression revealed that admission SII>920×109/L (adjusted OR = 3.68, 95% CI: 1.72–7.88, p=0.001), baseline ASPECTS ≤7 (adjusted OR = 4.12, 95% CI: 1.88–9.03, p<0.001), history of hypertensive pregnancy disorders in females (adjusted OR = 3.15, 95% CI: 1.18–8.42, p=0.022), and occipital/posterior visual pathway involvement (adjusted OR = 5.84, 95% CI: 2.24–15.22, p<0.001) were independent predictors of adverse 90-day neurological and visual outcomes.
Conclusion: Integrated evaluation of admission systemic inflammatory indices (SII), reproductive history (preeclampsia/gestational hypertension), and baseline neuroimaging scores (ASPECTS, lesion topography) provides high predictive accuracy for 90-day functional recovery and persistent visual deficits in acute ischemic stroke. Incorporating these multi-domain parameters into acute stroke triage enables early risk stratification and personalized rehabilitation planning.
References
2. Sacco RL, Kasner SE, Broderick JP, et al. An updated definition of stroke for the 21st century: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2013;44(7):2064–2089. doi:10.1161/STR.0b013e318296aeca.
3. Iadecola C, Anrather J. The immunology of stroke: from mechanisms to translation. Nat Med. 2011;17(7):796–808. doi:10.1038/nm.2399.
4. Campbell BCV, De Silva DA, Macleod MR, et al. Ischaemic stroke. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019;5(1):70. doi:10.1038/s41572-019-0118-8.
5. Jayaraj RL, Azimullah S, Beiram R, Jalal FY, Rosenberg GA. Neuroinflammation: friend and foe for ischemic stroke. J Neuroinflammation. 2019;16(1):142. doi:10.1186/s12974-019-1516-2.
6. Hu B, Yang XR, Xu Y, et al. Systemic immune-inflammation index is a promising prognostic biomarker in patients with severe inflammatory and neoplastic conditions. Ann Oncol. 2014;25(10):2062–2068. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdu254.
7. Weng Y, Zeng T, Shen Y, et al. Systemic immune-inflammation index predicts 3-month functional outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Front Neurol. 2021;12:728913. doi:10.3389/fneur.2021.728913.
8. Zhou Y, Zhang Y, Zhao X, et al. Systemic immune-inflammation index predicts hemorrhagic transformation and 90-day prognosis in patients with acute ischemic stroke receiving intravenous thrombolysis. Brain Behav. 2022;12(8):e2682. doi:10.1002/brb3.2682.
9. Bushnell C, McCullough LD, Awad IA, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in women: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2014;45(5):1545–1588. doi:10.1161/01.str.0000442009.06663.48.
10. Garovic VD, Dechend R, Easterling T, et al. Hypertension in pregnancy: diagnosis, blood pressure goals, and pharmacotherapy: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Hypertension. 2022;79(2):e21–e41. doi:10.1161/HYP.0000000000000208.
11. Benschop L, Duvekot JJ, Roeters van Lennep JE. Future cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease risk after preeclampsia. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2019;18:140–146. doi:10.1016/j.preghy.2019.09.013.
12. Rexrode KM, Madsen TE, Yu AYX, et al. Sex differences in stroke: epidemiology, clinical presentation, medical care, and outcomes. Lancet Neurol. 2022;21(11):985–998. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(22)00324-6.
13. Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, et al. Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: 2019 update to the 2018 guidelines for the early management of acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2019;50(12):e344–e418. doi:10.1161/STR.0000000000000211.
14. Barber PA, Demchuk AM, Zhang J, Buchan AM. Validity and reliability of a quantitative computed tomography score in predicting outcome of hyperacute stroke patients treated with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator. Lancet. 2000;355(9216):1670–1674. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02237-6.
15. Menon BK, Campbell BC, Levi CR, Demchuk AM. Role of imaging in current acute ischemic stroke workflow for endovascular therapy. Stroke. 2015;46(6):1453–1461. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009160.
16. Rowe FJ, Hepworth LR, Howard C, Hanna KL, Currie J, Viswanathan AC. High incidence and prevalence of visual dysfunction in stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain Behav. 2019;9(3):e01247. doi:10.1002/brb3.1247.
17. Sand KM, Midelfart A, Thomassen L, Hoff JM, Naess H. Visual impairment in acute stroke: incidence and characteristics. Acta Neurol Scand. 2016;133(2):107–114. doi:10.1111/ane.12442.
18. Yaghi S, Willey JZ, Cucchiara B, et al. Treatment and outcomes of small vessel ischemic stroke: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Stroke. 2020;51(5):e93–e103. doi:10.1161/STR.0000000000000227.
19. Nannoni S, de Groot R, Bell S, Markus HS. Stroke in women: risk factors, presentation, and outcomes. Nat Rev Neurol. 2021;17(6):361–371. doi:10.1038/s41582-021-00490-y.
20. Goyal M, Menon BK, van Zwam WH, et al. Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet. 2016;387(10029):1723–1731. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00163.

