Nutritional Status, Anemia, and Vitamin D Abnormalities Among Women of Reproductive Age: Findings from Quetta, Pakistan
Main Article Content
Keywords
Women of reproductive age, Nutritional status, Body mass index, anemia, Underweight
Abstract
Background: Women of reproductive age are vulnerable to a range of nutritional problems, including underweight, overweight, anemia, and vitamin D abnormalities. The coexistence of these conditions represents an important public-health challenge, particularly in resource-limited settings. This study assessed nutritional status, anemia, and vitamin D status among women of reproductive age and examined their associations.
Methods: A total of 425 women aged 15–49 years were included in the analysis. Sociodemographic characteristics, body mass index (BMI), nutritional status, anemia status, and vitamin D status were assessed. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize participant characteristics. Associations between nutritional status and anemia or vitamin D status were evaluated using Pearson’s chi-square test. Unadjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and effect sizes were calculated for binary comparisons. Statistical significance was considered at p < 0.05.
Results: Of the 425 participants, 47.1% were overweight, 14.4% were underweight, and 38.6% had normal BMI. Anemia was present in 23.5% of participants, while 21.6% had low vitamin D status, including 15.3% with insufficiency and 6.4% with deficiency. No significant associations were observed between underweight and anemia (OR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.39–1.51; p = 0.443), overweight and anemia (OR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.54–1.34; p = 0.483), or overweight and low vitamin D (OR = 1.16, 95% CI: 0.73–1.84; p = 0.523). Participants classified with abnormal nutritional status had significantly higher odds of low vitamin D than those with normal nutritional status (24.9% vs. 16.5%; OR = 1.68, 95% CI: 1.02–2.77; p = 0.040). Underweight participants also showed a higher prevalence of low vitamin D (31.1% vs. 20.1%), although the binary association was borderline (p = 0.052). Nutritional status varied significantly across age groups, with underweight more prominent among younger women and overweight increasingly predominant with advancing age (χ² = 45.08, p < 0.001; Cramér’s V = 0.416).
Conclusion: The study demonstrates a substantial burden of abnormal nutritional status, anemia, and low vitamin D among women of reproductive age. The significant association between abnormal nutritional status and low vitamin D, together with the age-related shift from underweight toward overweight, highlights the need for comprehensive nutritional assessment. Interventions should address both inadequate and excess nutrition while incorporating appropriate screening for micronutrient abnormalities.
References
2. Richardson, C., A. Clark, and F. Glycenfer, Nourishing in phases: a guide to nutrition throughout the menstrual cycle. 2026.
3. Riaz, M., et al., Dietary Habits, Nutritional Status, and Socioeconomic Factors Among University Students in Punjab, Pakistan: A Multicity Nutritional and Social Survey. Social Science Review Archives, 2026. 4(2): p. 2723-2742.
4. Lukwa, A.T. and D. Okova, The double burden of malnutrition: rethinking clinical and policy responses in the era of rising obesity in low-and middle-income countries. Public Health Nutrition, 2026. 29(1): p. e22.
5. Anato, A., et al., Anemia in Women of Reproductive Age (15–49 years) in West Africa: A Scoping Review of Etiologic Factors and Programmatic Implications. Nutrition Reviews, 2026. 84(9): p. 1956-1971.
6. Song, B., Global, regional and national burdens of iron deficiency anemia in women of childbearing age from 1990 to 2021: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2026: p. 1-8.
7. Thapa, R., ROLE OF IRON STATUS ON PSYCOSOCIAL DOMAINS (QUALITY OF LIFE, STRESS AND MOOD) IN WOMEN OF REPRODUCTIVE AGE. 2025, Purdue University Graduate School.
8. Islam, G.R., Inequality, chronic undernutrition, maternity, and diabetes mellitus as the determinant of anemia among ever-married women in Bangladesh. BMC Public Health, 2021. 21(1): p. 310.
9. Kiani, A.K., et al., Main nutritional deficiencies. Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene, 2022. 63(2 Suppl 3): p. E93.
10. Cashman, K.D., Vitamin D Deficiency: Defining, Prevalence, Causes, and Strategies of Addressing: KD Cashman. Calcified tissue international, 2020. 106(1): p. 14-29.
11. Deepika, D., et al., Widespread Hypovitaminosis D among Adolescent Girls in India: The Role of Dietary Vitamin D Intake and Socioeconomic Status. Nutrition Research, 2026.
12. Akhila, B., et al., Unraveling the Paradox of Vitamin D Deficiency in India: Interplay of Lifestyle, Genetics, Fortification Strategies, and Public Health Policies. Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry, 2026: p. 1-16.
13. Accacha, S., et al., Vitamin D and skeletal health: Practical approaches for bone health across the lifespan. Current Problems in Pediatric and Adolescent Health Care, 2026: p. 101940.
14. Zambrano-Villacres, R., et al., The seven methods for the evaluation of nutritional status—ABCDEFG: narrative review. Applied Sciences, 2026. 16(2): p. 845.
15. Iqbal, J., et al., Determinants of Folate and Vitamin B12 Deficiencies in Women of Reproductive Age: Insights from the 2018 National Nutrition Survey of Pakistan. Nutrients, 2026. 18(7): p. 1128.
16. Salam, R.A., et al., Effects of preventive nutrition interventions among adolescents on health and nutritional status in low-and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 2020. 16(2): p. cl2. 1085.
17. Akseer, N., et al., Global and regional trends in the nutritional status of young people: a critical and neglected age group. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2017. 1393(1): p. 3-20.
18. Gross, R., et al., Nutrition baseline surveys in communities. Nutrition surveys and calculations: guidelines, software and additional information. Version current, 1997.

