Assessment-Related Stress among First-Year MBBS Students: A Cross-Sectional Study

Main Article Content

DINESH THANGAVEL
Dr K. Arunkumar
Dr. N. Naganikka

Keywords

Assessment, Academic stress, First-year medical students, First MBBS, AI-enhanced medical education

Abstract

Background: Assessment is an integral component of competency-based medical education and is intended to facilitate continuous learning, self-directed study, and competency development. However, frequent internal assessments, extensive syllabus coverage, and inadequate preparation time may contribute to academic stress, particularly among First MBBS students.
Aim: To study the assessment-related stress among First MBBS students, identify major assessment-related stressors, and explore factors that may reduce stress and improve academic confidence.
Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study was conducted among 150 First MBBS students. Institutional Ethics Committee approval was obtained, and informed consent was secured from all participants. A structured, self-designed questionnaire assessed assessment frequency, syllabus load, adequacy of preparation time, performance pressure, feedback, and faculty support. Responses were recorded using a five-point Likert scale. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.
Results: Approximately 72% (108/150) of students perceived internal assessments as moderately to highly stressful. The major reported stressors were extensive syllabus coverage (74%), frequent assessments (68%), and short gaps between examinations (61%). Assessment-related stress was perceived to affect concentration in 58% of students, sleep in 46%, memory in 42%, and overall academic performance in 39%. Adequate preparation time (65%), constructive and timely feedback (71%), and supportive teacher guidance (69%) were identified as factors that helped reduce stress and improve confidence.
Conclusion: Assessment-related stress is common among First MBBS students. Extensive syllabus coverage, frequent assessments, and short intervals between examinations were the major perceived stressors. Optimizing assessment frequency and spacing, providing adequate preparation time, ensuring timely constructive feedback, and strengthening faculty mentoring may reduce assessment-related stress and promote effective learning.


 

Abstract 0 | PDF Downloads 0

References

1.Dyrbye LN, Thomas MR, Shanafelt TD. Systematic review of depression, anxiety, and other indicators of psychological distress among U.S. and Canadian medical students. Acad Med. 2006;81(4):354-373.
2.Rotenstein LS, Ramos MA, Torre M, Segal JB, Peluso MJ, Guille C, et al. Prevalence of depression, depressive symptoms, and suicidal ideation among medical students: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2016;316 (21):2214-2236.
3.National Medical Commission. Competency-Based Undergraduate Curriculum for the Indian Medical Graduate. New Delhi: National Medical Commission; 2019.
4.National Medical Commission. Competency-Based Assessment Module for Undergraduate Medical Education. New Delhi: National Medical Commission; 2019.
5.Lyndon MP, Strom JM, Alyami HM, Yu TC, Wilson NC, Singh PP, et al. The relationship between academic assessment and psychological distress among medical students: a systematic review. Perspect Med Educ. 2014;3(6):405-418.
6.Yusoff MSB, Abdul Rahim AF, Baba AA, Ismail SB, Pa MNM. Prevalence and sources of stress among Universiti Sains Malaysia medical students. Med Educ. 2010;44(7):718-727.
7.Anuradha R, Dutta R, Raja JD, Sivaprakasam P, Patil AB. Stress and stressors among medical undergraduate students: a cross-sectional study in a private medical college in Tamil Nadu. Indian J Community Med. 2017;42(4):222-225.
8.Shankar PR, Balasubramanium R, Dwivedi NR. Student stress in medical education: lessons from the Indian context. Educ Health. 2017;30 (3):238-244.
9.Archer JC. State of the science in health professional education: effective feedback. Med Educ. 2010;44(1):101-108.
10.Bastos ECMA, Almeida RLM, Lucchetti ALG, Tibiriçá SHC, Ezequiel OS, Lucchetti G. The use of feedback in improving the knowledge, attitudes and skills of medical students: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Med Sci Educ. 2021;31(6):2093-2104.
11.Ende J. Feedback in clinical medical education. JAMA. 1983;250(6):777-781.
12.Eva KW, Regehr G. Self-assessment in the health professions: a reformulation and research agenda. Acad Med. 2005;80(10 Suppl): S46-S54.
13.Shumway JM, Harden RM. AMEE Guide No. 25: The assessment of learning outcomes for the competent and reflective physician. Med Teach. 2003;25(6):569-584.
14.van der Vleuten CPM, Schuwirth LWT, Driessen EW, Dijkstra J, Tigelaar D, Baartman LKJ, et al. A model for programmatic assessment fit for purpose. Med Teach. 2012;34(3):205-214.
15.Harden RM, Crosby JR, Davis MH. AMEE Guide No. 14: Outcome-based education: Part 1—An introduction to outcome-based education. Med Teach. 1999;21(1):7-14.