A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY OF THE CLINICAL AND BACTERIOLOGICAL PROFILE OF COMMUNITY ACQUIRED PNEUMONIA IN ADULT PATIENTS

Main Article Content

Dr. Archana Andhavarapu
Dr. Chandra Sekhar Gurugubelli

Keywords

Community-acquired pneumonia, clinical profile, bacteriological profile, antimicrobial resistance, adult, cross-sectional study.

Abstract

Background: Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) remains one of the most prevalent and potentially life-threatening infectious diseases affecting adults worldwide. Despite advances in diagnostic techniques and therapeutic interventions, CAP continues to impose a substantial burden on healthcare resources.


Objectives: To provide a comprehensive analysis of the clinical and bacteriological profile of adult patients diagnosed with CAP in a tertiary care hospital. To evaluate the prevalence of co-morbidities, the spectrum of causative agents, antimicrobial resistance patterns, and factors influencing clinical outcomes.


Methodology: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted over 18 months, enrolling 350 adults (>18 years old) with a confirmed diagnosis of CAP. Clinical assessments, laboratory investigations, radiological evaluations, and microbiological cultures were performed. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was conducted for all isolates. Statistical analyses were performed.


Results: The study cohort had a mean age of 54.2 years, with a male predominance. The common symptoms included cough (92%), fever (87%), and dyspnea (70%). Co-morbidities were present in 69% of patients, with diabetes mellitus and COPD being the most frequent. Streptococcus pneumoniae was the leading pathogen (41%), followed by Haemophilus influenzae (15%) and atypical bacteria (12%). Resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics was notable, while fluoroquinolones and macrolides retained efficacy. Multi-lobar involvement, advanced age, co-morbidities, and delayed antibiotic therapy were significantly associated with increased mortality (9%).


Conclusion: CAP in adults displays significant diversity, with a considerable burden of co-morbidities and antimicrobial resistance. Early diagnosis, tailored empirical therapy based on local resistance patterns, and prompt management of underlying illnesses are crucial for improving outcomes mentioned above.


 


 

Abstract 0 | pdf Downloads 0

References

1. World Health Organization. Pneumonia. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/pneumonia
2. Musher DM, Thorner AR. Community-acquired pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(17):1619-28.
3. Torres A, Peetermans WE, Viegi G, Blasi F. Risk factors for community-acquired pneumonia in adults in Europe: a literature review. Thorax. 2013;68(11):1057-65.
4. Jain S, Self WH, Wunderink RG, et al. Community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization among U.S. adults. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(5):415-27.
5. Mandell LA, Wunderink RG, Anzueto A, et al. Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society consensus guidelines on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44(Suppl 2):S27–S72.
6. Lim WS, van der Eerden MM, Laing R, et al. Defining community acquired pneumonia severity on presentation to hospital: an international derivation and validation study. Thorax. 2003;58(5):377-82.
7. Lisboa, Thiago et al. “Pleural infection: changing bacteriology and its implications.” Respirology (Carlton, Vic.) vol. 16,4 (2011): 598-603. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1843.2011.01964.
8. Fine MJ, Auble TE, Yealy DM, et al. A prediction rule to identify low-risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 1997;336(4):243-50.
9. Arancibia F, Bauer TT, Ewig S, et al. Community-acquired pneumonia due to Gram-negative bacteria and Pseudomonas aeruginosa: incidence, risk, and prognosis. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(16):1849-58.
10. File TM Jr, Marrie TJ. Burden of community-acquired pneumonia in North American adults. Postgrad Med. 2010;122(2):130-41.
11. Almirall J, Bolíbar I, Vidal J, et al. Epidemiology of community-acquired pneumonia in adults: a population-based study. Eur Respir J. 2000;15(4):757-763.