FREQUENCY OF EMERGENCY OBSTETRIC HYSTERECTOMY (EOH) IN PATIENTS OF PLACENTA PREVIA
Main Article Content
Keywords
Emergency obstetric hysterectomy, Indications, Maternal morbidity, Placenta Previa.
Abstract
Background: In the case of severe obstetric bleeding, emergency obstetric hysterectomy (EOH) is a potentially life-saving surgical intervention in the failure of conservative therapy. Uncontrolled bleeding of the placenta Previa, uterine rupture and atony is also a predominant manifestation in developing countries.
Material & Methods: The study was a descriptive cross-sectional applied in the department of obstetrics and gynecology between June 2022 till Dec 2022, with the approval of the institutional ethical review committee and the college of physicians and surgeons Pakistan. Non-probability consecutive sampling was used to include 150 women who had a diagnosis of placenta Previa. Emergency obstetric hysterectomy as a result of Placenta Previa was the major outcome variable. The analysis of data was done in SPSS version 22. The descriptive statistics were used to compute the average, standard deviation and frequency percentages of the variables that were categorical.
Results: A total of 150 women with placenta previa were included, with a mean maternal age of 30.9 +- 5.1 years. The frequency of Emergency Obstetric Hysterectomy was 18%. Significant associations were observed with parity (p = 0.031), booking status (p = 0.014), and previous cesarean sections (p = 0.004), while maternal age, BMI, and gestational age showed no significant relationship with hysterectomy.
Conclusion: EOH is a significant complication among women with placenta previa, particularly in those with higher parity, unbooked status, and prior cesarean sections. Strengthening antenatal care and early risk identification may help reduce severe maternal morbidity.
References
Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23866483/
2. Chawla J, Arora D, Paul M, Ajmani SN. Emergency Obstetric Hysterectomy: A Retrospective Study from a Teaching Hospital in North India over Eight Years. Oman Med J. 2015 May; 30(3):181-6. doi: 10.5001/omj.2015.39.
3. Naureen J, Sumera T. Emergency obstetric hysterectomy – one year review at Allied hospital, Faisalabad. Ann Punjab Med Coll. 2010;4(1):86–9.
doi: https://doi.org/10.29054/apmc/2010.680
4. Sarah K. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: a great obstetric challenge. Pak J Med Sci. 2018;34(6):1567–70.
doi: 10.12669/pjms.346.13686
5. Uzma M, Rahila FC, Aasma H. An analysis of emergency obstetrical hysterectomies over five years in Pakistan. Rawal Med J. 2019;44(2):284–7.
Available from: https://rmj.org.pk
6. Zhang Y, Yan J, Han Q, Yang T, Cai L, Fu Y, et al. Emergency obstetric hysterectomy for life-threatening postpartum hemorrhage: a 12-year review. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(45):e8443.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008443
7. Daskalakis G, Anastasakis E, Papantoniou N, Mesogitis S, Theodora M, Antsaklis A. Emergency obstetric hysterectomy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86(2):223–7.
doi: 10.1080/00016340601088448
8. Khairunnisa N, Gulfareen H, Memon N, Ambreen H. Emergency obstetric hysterectomy frequency and maternal outcome. Pak Armed Forces Med J. 2010;60(2):274–7.
Available from: https://pafmj.org/PAFMJ/article/view/852
9. Chawla J, Arora D, Paul M, Ajmani SN. Emergency obstetric hysterectomy: a retrospective study from a teaching hospital in North India over eight years. Oman Med J. 2015;30(3):181–6.
doi: 10.5001/omj.2015.39
10. Hassan SA, Nedaa MB, Samera FA, Estabrq AH, Ibrahim HS, Wesam RD, et al. Placenta previa: 13 years’ experience at a tertiary care center in Western Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J. 2016;37(7):762–6.
doi: 10.15537/smj.2016.7.13259
11. Schneiderman M, Balayla JA. Comparative study of neonatal outcomes in placenta previa versus cesarean for other indication at term. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013;26(11):1121–7.
doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.770465
12. MacDorman M, Declercq E, Menacker F. Recent trends and patterns in cesarean and vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) deliveries in the United States. Clin Perinatol. 2011;38(2):179–92.
doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2011.03.007
13. Dandolu V, Graul AB, Lyons A, Matteo D. Obstetrical hysterectomy, cesarean delivery and abnormal placentation. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25(1):74–7.
doi: 10.3109/14767058.2011.565391
14. Yang X, Li Y, Li C, Zang W. Current overview of assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(2):385–91.
doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.10.017
15. Tahseen H, Tahira T, Hafiz S, Noreen Z. Placenta previa: A comparative study of obstetric outcome in previously scarred and unscarred uterus. Pak J Med Health Sci. 2018;12(3):889–91.
Available from: https://pjmhsonline.com/2018/july_sep/pdf/889.pdf
16. Brace V, Kernaghan D, Penney G. Learning from adverse clinical outcomes: major obstetric haemorrhage in Scotland 2003–05. BJOG. 2007;114(11):1388–96.
doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01533.x
17. Getahun D, Oyelese Y, Salihu HM, Ananth CV. Previous cesarean delivery and risks of placenta previa and placental abruption. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(4):771–8.
doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000206182.63788.80
18. Smith J, Mousa HA. Peripartum hysterectomy for primary postpartum haemorrhage: incidence and maternal morbidity. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;27(1):44–7.
doi: 10.1080/01443610601016925
19. Monjok E. Re: Warraich Q, Esen U. 2009. Perimortem caesarean section. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 29:690-693. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010 May;30(4):428; author reply 429. doi: 10.3109/01443610903560146.
20. MacDorman M, Declercq E, Menacker F. Recent trends and patterns in cesarean and vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) deliveries in the United States. Clin Perinatol. 2011 Jun;38(2):179-92. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2011.03.007.

