A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS ON PHYSIOLOGICAL MODULATION OF BARORECEPTOR SENSITIVITY BY ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUGS
Main Article Content
Keywords
Baroreceptor sensitivity; Baroreflex; Antihypertensive drugs; Autonomic regulation; Hypertension; Systematic review; Meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: Baroreceptor sensitivity (BRS) plays a critical role in short-term blood pressure regulation and cardiovascular autonomic control. Impaired BRS is commonly observed in hypertension and is associated with increased cardiovascular risk. Antihypertensive drugs lower blood pressure through diverse pharmacological mechanisms that may differentially influence baroreflex function; however, the physiological effects of these agents on BRS have not been comprehensively synthesized.
Objective: To systematically evaluate and quantitatively synthesize the effects of major classes of antihypertensive drugs on baroreceptor sensitivity in adult humans.
Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Web of Science in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Randomized controlled trials, crossover studies, and observational studies assessing baroreceptor sensitivity in adults receiving antihypertensive therapy were included. Baroreceptor sensitivity was measured using pharmacological, spontaneous sequence, or spectral analysis techniques. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool and ROBINS-I. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed, with heterogeneity quantified using the I² statistic. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on antihypertensive drug class and BRS assessment method.
Results: Antihypertensive therapy was associated with an overall improvement in baroreceptor sensitivity compared with baseline or control conditions. Renin–angiotensin system inhibitors and central sympatholytic agents consistently demonstrated significant enhancement of baroreflex function, likely mediated by improved arterial compliance and reduced sympathetic activity. Beta-blockers and calcium-channel blockers showed variable or modest effects, influenced by drug-specific physiological actions and the method of BRS assessment. Diuretics exhibited minimal impact on baroreceptor sensitivity. Moderate heterogeneity was observed across studies, attributable to differences in study design, treatment duration, and BRS measurement techniques.
Conclusion: Antihypertensive drugs exert class-specific physiological effects on baroreceptor sensitivity. Agents that improve arterial compliance or suppress sympathetic activity are most effective in enhancing baroreflex function, whereas other classes demonstrate neutral or variable effects. These findings underscore the importance of autonomic modulation as a complementary therapeutic target in hypertension and support a physiology-driven approach to antihypertensive drug selection. Further standardized and long-term studies are required to clarify the prognostic significance of baroreflex improvement.
References
2. Benarroch EE. The arterial baroreflex: functional organization and involvement in neurologic disease. Neurology. 2008;71(21):1733–8.
3. La Rovere MT, Pinna GD, Raczak G. Baroreflex sensitivity: measurement and clinical implications. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2008;13(2):191–207.
4. Parati G, Di Rienzo M, Mancia G. How to measure baroreflex sensitivity: from the cardiovascular laboratory to daily life. J Hypertens. 2000;18(1):7–19.
5. Safar ME, Levy BI, Struijker-Boudier H. Current perspectives on arterial stiffness and pulse pressure in hypertension and cardiovascular diseases. Circulation. 2003;107(22):2864–9.
6. Grassi G, Mark A, Esler M. The sympathetic nervous system alterations in human hypertension. Circ Res. 2015;116(6):976–90.
7. La Rovere MT, Bigger JT Jr, Marcus FI, Mortara A, Schwartz PJ. Baroreflex sensitivity and heart-rate variability in prediction of total cardiac mortality after myocardial infarction. Lancet. 1998;351(9101):478–84.
8. Floras JS. Sympathetic nervous system activation in human heart failure: clinical implications of an updated model. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54(5):375–85.
9. Schwartz PJ, De Ferrari GM. Sympathetic–parasympathetic interaction in health and disease: abnormalities and relevance in heart failure. Circ Res. 2011;108(6):720–38.
10. Mancia G, Grassi G. Antihypertensive treatment: past, present and future. J Hypertens. 2014;32(9):170–6.
11. Schiffrin EL. Effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor antagonists on vascular remodeling. Hypertension. 1999;33(1 Pt 2):1–6.
12. Julius S, Nesbitt S. Sympathetic overactivity in hypertension: a moving target. J Hypertens. 1996;14(Suppl 5):S3–S8.
13. Esler M. The sympathetic nervous system through the ages: from Thomas Willis to resistant hypertension. Exp Physiol. 2011;96(7):611–22.
14. Parati G, Mancia G. Baroreflex sensitivity in hypertension: implications for cardiovascular risk stratification. J Hypertens Suppl. 1997;15(2):S19–S25.
15. Grossman E, Messerli FH. Calcium antagonists. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2004;47(1):34–57.
16. Kaplan NM. Kaplan’s Clinical Hypertension. 11th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2015.
17. Di Rienzo M, Parati G, Castiglioni P, Tordi R, Mancia G. Baroreflex effectiveness index: an additional measure of baroreflex control of heart rate in daily life. Hypertension. 2001;38(6):133–8.
18. Parati G, Saul JP, Di Rienzo M, Mancia G. Spectral analysis of blood pressure and heart rate variability in evaluating cardiovascular regulation: a critical appraisal. Hypertension. 1995;25(6):1276–86.
19. La Rovere MT, Pinna GD, Maestri R, et al. Prognostic implications of baroreflex sensitivity in heart failure patients in the beta-blocking era. Circulation. 2001;103(16):2072–7.
20. Schwartz PJ, La Rovere MT, Vanoli E. Autonomic nervous system and sudden cardiac death: experimental basis and clinical observations for post-myocardial infarction risk stratification. Circulation. 1992;85(1 Suppl):I77–I91.

