DESIGN, SYNTHESIS, SPECTRAL CHARACTERIZATION AND IN-SILICO ANTIDIABETIC EVALUATION OF A HYDRAZONE–CYANOGUANIDINE AND A DIPHENYLPYRROLONE–GUANIDINE CONJUGATE

Main Article Content

Prafulkumar Rajeshbhai Valand
Dr. Jayshreeben Narsinhbhai Patel

Keywords

hydrazone; guanidine; pyrrolone; α-glucosidase; PPAR-γ; SwissADME; GUSAR; antidiabetic.

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus remains a major global health challenge and demands novel antidiabetic chemotypes with improved safety and pharmacokinetic profiles. Hydrazone, guanidine and pyrrol/pyrrolone motifs are privileged scaffolds in current antidiabetic drug discovery, particularly as α-glucosidase and DPP-4 inhibitors or PPAR-γ modulators(11,12,13,14). Here we report the synthesis, full spectroscopic characterization and in-silico evaluation of two new small molecules: Compound 3, an open-chain hydrazone–cyanoguanidine derivative (C₉H₁₂N₄; SMILES: CC(=NN=C(N)N)c1ccccc1), and Compound 4, a highly conjugated diphenylpyrrolone–guanidine system bearing a 4-nitrophenyl moiety, (E)-2-(4-nitrophenyl)-1-((Z)-3-oxo-4,5-diphenyl-1,3-dihydro-2H-pyrrol-2-ylidene)guanidine (C₂₃H₁₇N₅O₃). Both compounds were synthesized by condensation strategies: Compound 3 from acetone phenylhydrazone and cyanoguanidine; Compound 4 from benzil, cyanoguanidine and p-iodonitrobenzene via cyclocondensation and N-arylation. Structures were confirmed by IR, ¹H and ¹³C NMR and mass spectrometry. Diagnostic bands for N–H, C=N and C–N in the IR spectra, together with downfield C=N carbons in the ¹³C NMR spectra, unequivocally supported the proposed hydrazone/guanidine and pyrrolone–ylidene frameworks. SwissADME calculations indicated acceptable physicochemical and drug-likeness profiles with no major structural alerts. GUSAR-based toxicity modeling predicted moderate acute oral toxicity (rat LD₅₀ ~ 835 mg·kg⁻¹ for Compound 4; OECD Class 4) and low bioaccumulation potential. Target-prediction and docking studies suggested favorable binding of both compounds to key antidiabetic targets (α-glucosidase and PPAR-γ).


This work introduces two new guanidine-containing chemotypes supported by comprehensive spectral and in-silico evidence and provides a complete experimental framework for their biological evaluation as potential antidiabetic leads.

Abstract 5 | Pdf Downloads 7

References

1. Daina A, Michielin O, Zoete V. SwissADME: a free web tool to evaluate pharmacokinetics, drug-likeness and medicinal chemistry friendliness of small molecules. Sci Rep. 2017;7:42717.
2. Bakchi B, et al. An overview on applications of SwissADME web tool in medicinal chemistry. J Mol Struct. 2022.
3. Sawant RL, et al. Targeting PPAR-γ to design and synthesize antidiabetic agents. EXCLI J. 2018.
4. Yasmin S, et al. Thiazolidinediones and PPAR orchestra as antidiabetic agents. Eur J Med Chem. 2017.
5. Srinivasa MG, et al. Development of novel thiazolidine-2,4-dione derivatives as PPAR-γ ligands. Sci Rep. 2023.
6. Najmi A, et al. Synthesis, molecular docking and in-vivo antidiabetic evaluation of benzylidene thiazolidinediones. Sci Rep. 2023.
7. Khan I, et al. Triazole-containing bis-hydrazones as α-amylase and α-glucosidase inhibitors. ACS Omega. 2023.
8. Noreen F, et al. 7-Fluorochromone thiosemicarbazones as multi-target antidiabetic agents: in vitro and in silico studies. Sci Rep. 2025.
9. Thabet HK, et al. Thiazole–sulfonamide derivatives targeting DPP-4, α-glucosidase and α-amylase. Chem Biol Interact. 2024.
10. Dej-adisai S, et al. α-Glucosidase inhibitory assay and isolation of flavonoids. Plants. 2021.
11. Ghani U. Re-exploring promising α-glucosidase inhibitors for T2DM. Eur J Med Chem. 2015.
12. Dirir AM, et al. Plant-derived α-glucosidase inhibitors as antidiabetic agents. Phytochem Rev. 2022.
13. Akmal M, et al. Alpha-glucosidase inhibitors. In: StatPearls [Internet]. 2024.
14. Coleman RL, et al. Meta-analysis of α-glucosidase inhibitors on cardiovascular outcomes. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2019.
15. Scott LJ, et al. Miglitol: a review of its therapeutic potential. Drugs. 2000.
16. Rena G, et al. The mechanisms of action of metformin. Diabetologia. 2017.
17. LaMoia TE, Shulman GI. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of metformin action. Endocr Rev. 2021.
18. Ghasemi A, et al. Streptozotocin as a tool for induction of diabetic rat models. Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2023.
19. OECD. Test No. 423: Acute Oral Toxicity – Acute Toxic Class Method. OECD Publishing, 2002.
20. OECD. Test No. 420 and 425: Acute Oral Toxicity Guidelines. OECD Publishing.
21. Genexplain GmbH. GUSAR software and pre-computed models.
22. (Prafulkumar R Valand, 2025)
23. Askerova UF, et al. Prediction of acute toxicity for benzofuran hydrazone derivatives using GUSAR. New Med Compounds. 2021.
24. Bakchi B, et al. Applications of SwissADME in medicinal-chemistry research. J Mol Struct. 2022.
25. Sawant RL, et al. Docking-based design of thiazolidine PPAR-γ agonists. EXCLI J. 2018.
26. Petrova OV, et al. Synthesis of pyrrole-heterocyclic derivatives as bioactive agents. J Mol Struct. 2024.
27. Bhat AA, Tandon N, Tandon R. Pyrrolidine derivatives as antidiabetic agents: current status. Med Chem 2022.
28. Mugaranja KP, et al. α-Glucosidase inhibition activity of phenolic fractions. Heliyon. 2020