COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF SCREW-RETAINED AND CEMENT-RETAINED IMPLANT RESTORATIONS: A CLINICAL STUDY AT FARYAL DENTAL COLLEGE, PAKISTAN

Main Article Content

Rahul Butani
Ghazala Suleman
Nausheen Jawaid
Mohammed Kaleem Khan
Shuja Hamid
Zehra Iqtidar

Keywords

Implant Restorations, Comparative Assessment, screw-retained implant restorations, cement-retained implant restorations

Abstract

This study examines the frequency and factors inducing the use of screw-retained and cement-retained implant restorations among dentists in Faryal Dental College and compares these results with those from a similar study done in Saudi Arabia.


Materials and Methods: Across Pakistan a five-page questionnaire was sent to private clinics and dental institutions. Descriptive statistics and Chi-square tests was used to analyzing data.


Results: 120 surveys were distributed, but 90 were returned, giving a response rate of 75%. Cement-retained restorations were preferred by 73.3% of dentist, while 26.7% preferred screw-retained restorations. Resin-modified glass ionomer cement was the most used cement (46%), shadowed by resin cement (28%), conventional GIC (21%), and zinc phosphate (5%). Laboratory limits influenced the choice of retention system for 55.6% of respondents.


Conclusions: In Pakistan, most dentists still prefer cement-retained restorations mainly because they are cheap and easier to manage in local laboratories. However, awareness about screw-retained options is gradually increasing, especially among younger dentists.

Abstract 23 | PDF Downloads 6

References

1. Makke A, Alhajj M, AlQahtani A. Survey of screw-retained versus cement-retained implant restorations in Saudi Arabia. Int J Dent. 2017;2017:5478371.
2. Chee W, Jivraj S. Screw versus cemented implant-supported restorations. Br Dent J. 2006;201(8):501–507.
3. Bashir M, Zafar MS. Materials in modern implant prosthodontics. Pak J Med Sci. 2022;38(4):890–896.
4. Wittneben JG, Joda T, Weber HP. Screw-retained vs cement-retained prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25(4):81–90.
5. Eshra A, et al. Influence of laboratory support on clinician choice. Int J Prosthodont. 2015;28(3):237–244.
6. Taylor TD, Agar JR. Implant prosthodontics: current perspective. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000;15(1):66–75.
7. Millar BJ, Taylor NG. Choice of cement for implant restorations. Br Dent J. 2020;228(5):337–343.
8. Pauletto N et al. Residual cement as a cause of peri-implantitis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999;14(6):869–879.
9. Siddiqui A, Shah SA. Barriers to oral health care utilization in Pakistan. Pak Oral Dent J. 2019;39(1):45–49.
10. Linkevicius T, Apse P. Margin location and cement excess. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021;32(4):451–458.
11. Nazir MA et al. Public awareness about implant dentistry in developing countries. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019;20(8):932–937.
12. Hussain M et al. Trends in implant prosthetics in developing regions. J Pak Dent Assoc. 2022;31(1):45–53.
13. Wilson TG. Excess cement and peri-implant disease. J Periodontol. 2009;80(9):1388–1392.
14. Majid OW. Retention type and peri-implant disease. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2024;24(1):10–20.
15. Al-Mubarak S et al. Perception and barriers to implant therapy among Saudi patients. Saudi J Dent Res. 2022;33(1):89–97.
16. Kourkouta S et al. Regional variations in implant prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent. 2023;130(2):215–223.
17. Buser D et al. Modern implant dentistry based on osseointegration. Periodontol 2000. 2017;73(1):7–21.
18. Majid S, Siddiqui A. Laboratory challenges in implant dentistry in Pakistan. Pak Oral Dent J. 2024;44(2):123–130.
19. Shadid R, Sadaqa N. A comparison between screw- and cement-retained implant prostheses. J Oral Implantol. 2012;38(3):298–307.
20. Pennington J, Parker S. Improving quality of life using implant prostheses. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2012;33(4):268–276.
21. Kourtis S et al. Clinical decision-making in implant prosthodontics: A global perspective. Int J Oral Rehabil. 2023;50(5):321–330.
22. Chrcanovic BR et al. Comparison between cement- and screw-retained implant restorations: A meta-analysis. J Prosthodont. 2021;30(7):588–598.
23. Ahmad Z et al. Digital transformation in Pakistani dental practice. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2023;33(8):869–876.
24. Mayya A et al. Awareness of dental implants in South India. Indian J Dent Res. 2018;29(3):263–7.
25. Makke A, Alhajj M, AlQahtani A. Survey of screw-retained versus cement-retained implant restorations in Saudi Arabia. Int J Dent. 2017;2017:5478371.
26. Chee W, Jivraj S. Screw versus cemented implant-supported restorations. Br Dent J. 2006;201(8):501–507.
27. Wittneben JG, Joda T, Weber HP. Screw-retained vs cement-retained prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25(4):81–90.
28. Bashir M, Zafar MS. Materials in modern implant prosthodontics. Pak J Med Sci. 2022;38(4):890–896.
29. Kourkouta S, et al. Regional variations in implant prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent. 2023;130(2):215–223.
30. Majid S, Siddiqui A. Laboratory challenges in implant dentistry in Pakistan. Pak Oral Dent J. 2024;44(2):123–130.
31. Eshra A, et al. Influence of laboratory support on clinician choice. Int J Prosthodont. 2015;28(3):237–244.
32. Nazir MA, et al. Public awareness about implant dentistry in developing countries. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019;20(8):932–937.
33. Siddiqui A, Shah SA. Barriers to oral health care utilization in Pakistan. Pak Oral Dent J. 2019;39(1):45–49.
34. Pauletto N, Rigo H, et al. Residual cement as a cause of peri-implantitis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999;14(6):869–879.
35. Majid OW. Retention type and peri-implant disease. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2024;24(1):10–20.
36. Wilson TG. Excess cement and peri-implant disease. J Periodontol. 2009;80(9):1388–1392.
37. Linkevicius T, Apse P. Margin location and cement excess. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021;32(4):451–458.
38. Taylor TD, Agar JR. Implant prosthodontics: current perspective. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000;15(1):66–75.
39. Millar BJ, Taylor NG. Choice of cement for implant restorations. Br Dent J. 2020;228(5):337–343.
40. Shadid R, Sadaqa N. A comparison between screw- and cement-retained implant prostheses. J Oral Implantol. 2012;38(3):298–307.
41. Hussain M, et al. Trends in implant prosthetics in developing regions. J Pak Dent Assoc. 2022;31(1):45–53.
42. Al-Mubarak S, et al. Perception and barriers to implant therapy among Saudi patients. Saudi J Dent Res. 2022;33(1):89–97.
43. Mayya A, et al. Awareness of dental implants in South India. Indian J Dent Res. 2018;29(3):263–7.
44. Elarbi M, et al. Patient perception and satisfaction toward dental implants in Egypt. Egypt Dent J. 2021;67(3):2153–62.
45. Chrcanovic BR, et al. Comparison between cement- and screw-retained implant restorations: A meta-analysis. J Prosthodont. 2021;30(7):588–598.
46. Kourtis S, et al. Clinical decision-making in implant prosthodontics: A global perspective. Int J Oral Rehabil. 2023;50(5):321–330.
47. Pennington J, Parker S. Improving quality of life using implant prostheses. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2012;33(4):268–276.
48. Buser D, et al. Modern implant dentistry based on osseointegration. Periodontol 2000. 2017;73(1):7–21.