CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS OF PERICAPSULAR NERVE GROUP (PENG) BLOCK IN CHRONIC HIP PAIN: A RETROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY
Main Article Content
Keywords
PENG block; chronic hip pain; hip osteoarthritis; regional anesthesia; pain intervention, ultrasound-guided intervention; opioid-sparing analgesia.
Abstract
Background: Chronic hip pain limits mobility and quality of life, and many patients have suboptimal relief or medication intolerance. The pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block targets articular branches to the anterior hip capsule, aiming for motor-sparing analgesia.
Objective: To evaluate real-world effectiveness, opioid/NSAID-sparing impact, and safety of ultrasound-guided PENG block in chronic hip pain.
Methods: Retrospective observational analysis at a tertiary pain clinic. Consecutive adults receiving PENG block for chronic hip pain were included. Demographics, etiologies, and procedural details were abstracted. Outcomes were Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0–10) pain scores at baseline, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months; functional recovery (HOOS domains where available); changes in NSAID/opioid use; patient satisfaction (5-point Likert); and adverse events. Longitudinal comparisons used appropriate parametric/non-parametric tests; significance at p<0.05.
Results: Of 82 screened, 72 were analyzed (mean age 63.8 ± 8.9 years; 58.3% female). Etiologies: osteoarthritis 70.8%, post-arthroplasty pain 18.1%, avascular necrosis 6.9%, greater trochanteric pain 4.2%. Baseline NRS was 8.2 ± 0.9. Mean NRS improved to 3.4 ± 1.1 at 1 week, 2.8 ± 1.3 at 1 month, and 3.1 ± 1.5 at 3 months (all p<0.001 vs baseline; repeated-measures effect size η²=0.71). Clinically meaningful pain relief (≥50%) persisted in 68.1% at 3 months. HOOS domains improved significantly, with median functional gain ~59%. NSAID use decreased from 94.4% to 38.9%, and opioid use from 15.3% to 2.8% by 3 months. Satisfaction was high (very satisfied 70.8%, satisfied 20.8%). No major complications occurred; minor, self-limited effects in 13.9%. No quadriceps weakness was observed.
Conclusions: Ultrasound-guided PENG block provided substantial, durable, and motor-sparing analgesia for chronic hip pain with marked reductions in NSAID/opioid use and excellent safety. These real-world data support integrating PENG block into multimodal, non-surgical management pathways for appropriately selected patients.
References
2. Sato R, Tsuchiya T, Doi K, Sugiura K, Iwasaki Y, Yokota K. Single PENG block using long-acting anesthetic with steroid for hip osteoarthritis: case series. J Anesth. 2023;37(2):197-203.
3. Kose SG, Yavuz SS, Yilmaz C, Ozkan F, Uysal HY. Ultrasound-guided PENG block versus intra-articular injection in hip osteoarthritis: randomized trial. Korean J Pain. 2023;36(1):91-99.
4. Aziz MB, Abdallah FW. Pericapsular Nerve Group Block. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024.
5. Donatiello V, Lee A, Rossi F, et al. PENG block in elderly hip fracture patients: retrospective cohort study. J Anaesth Analg Crit Care. 2025;5:2.
6. Reysner M, Hallows G, Portera-Cailliau G. Ethanol neurolysis of pericapsular nerves for chronic hip pain: case series. Br J Anaesth. 2025;124(3):e29-e34.
7. Hipskind J, Patel R, Kumar A. Ultrasound-guided PENG block: anatomy, technique and clinical applications. Ultrasonography. 2025;44(1):54-61.
8. Hanauer M, Smith A, Roberts L. PENG block in anterior total hip arthroplasty: randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2025;107(7):523-531.
9. Jadon A, Sharma M, Govil D. Pulsed radiofrequency of PENG for hip OA-related adductor spasm: case report. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2021;49(4):320-323.
10. Choi JH, Moon D, Park SH. Hip capsule innervation and relevance to PENG block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2022;47(9):743-749.
11. Coyne L, Caruso B. Anatomy of articular sensory branches to the hip capsule: implications for PENG block. Clin Anat. 2022;35(3):345-352.
12. Lee YK, Park JH, Kim HS. Motor-sparing hip analgesia: systematic review of PENG and iliaca blocks. Pain Med. 2023;24(2):317-327.
13. Wang D, Wang L, Zhang Z. PENG block and opioid-sparing after hip arthroplasty: meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2024;19(1):78.
14. Singh N, Bhatia S, Kumar R. Long-term outcomes of PENG block in hip osteoarthritis: 12-month study. Pain Pract. 2024;24(6):768-776.
15. Brown K, Willis S, Collins P. Patient-reported outcomes and cost-effectiveness of PENG block in chronic hip pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2024;49(5):464-471.
16. Nguyen T, Lee K, Young L. Safety profile of PENG block in outpatient practice: prospective study. Pain Ther. 2023;12(4):1401-1412.
17. Olson M, Eriksson O, Forsberg M. PENG block plus physiotherapy improves functional outcomes in hip OA. J Rehabil Med. 2023;55(3):e14.
18. Patel H, Shah R. Clinical effectiveness of PENG block in chronic hip pain: retrospective clinic review. Int J Pain Manag. 2024;10(2):45-52.
19. Miller D, Li J, Hobson R. Ultrasound assessment of pericapsular nerve anatomy for PENG block. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2022;48(12):3074-3082.
20. Zhang Y, Wei Z, Sun J. Improvement in quality of life after PENG block in elderly hip OA patients. Age Ageing. 2024;53(4):193-199.
21. Smith G, Clark D, Jones H. PENG block vs femoral nerve block in hip surgery pain control: randomized trial. Anesth Analg. 2023;136(1):123-130.
22. Garcia L, Hruz A, Lippert W. Ultrasound guidance techniques for PENG block: technical review. Tech Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2022;26(1):11-17.
23. Tiwari S, Sharma V. PENG block in chronic greater trochanteric pain syndrome: pilot study. J Pain Res. 2024;17:165-172.
24. Johnson M, Morris N. Early mobilization and motor-sparing effect of PENG block after hip surgery. J Orthop Trauma. 2023;37(8):e341-e347.
25. Girón-Arango L, Peng PWH, Chin KJ, et al. Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block for hip pain: description and pilot case series. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018;43(8):859-863.
