CORRELATION OF CAROTID INTIMA MEDIA THICKNESS WITH GLYCAEMIC CONTROL AND ANTHROPOMETRIC PARAMETERS IN PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY
Main Article Content
Keywords
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Carotid Intima Media Thickness, Glycaemic Control, Anthropometry, Cardiovascular Risk, Subclinical Atherosclerosis
Abstract
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) is a chronic condition associated with increased cardiovascular risk due to subclinical atherosclerosis. Carotid Intima Media Thickness (CIMT) is a non-invasive marker for early atherosclerotic changes.
Objectives: To assess CIMT in patients with T2DM and determine its correlation with glycaemic control and anthropometric risk factors.
Methods: This cross-sectional observational study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Solan over 18 months. A total of 80 T2DM patients aged 25–60 years were recruited. CIMT was measured using B-mode ultrasonography at three points on each side of the common carotid artery. Glycaemic control was assessed using fasting blood glucose and HbA1c levels. Anthropometric data including BMI, waist circumference, and waist-to-hip ratio were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata 17.0, with significance set at p<0.05.
Results: The mean age of participants was 48.1 years. The mean CIMT was 0.77 mm on the right and 0.773 mm on the left. High-risk CIMT values were observed in 26.3% of participants. CIMT showed a statistically significant positive correlation with BMI (r=0.313, p=0.005), waist-to-hip ratio (r=0.672, p<0.0001), HbA1c (r=0.664, p<0.001), and total cholesterol (r=0.413, p=0.003). Most participants (77.5%) had no detectable carotid plaque.
Conclusion: CIMT is significantly associated with poor glycaemic control and adverse anthropometric indices in T2DM patients. Routine CIMT assessment may help in early detection of cardiovascular risk and guide preventive strategies in this population.
References
2. Powers AC, Stafford JM, Rickels MR. Diabetes Mellitus: Complications. In: Loscalzo J, Fauci A, Kasper D, Hauser S, Longo D, Jameson JL, editors. Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine, 21e. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education; 2022.
3. Ogurtsova K, da Rocha Fernandes JD, Huang Y, Linnenkamp U, Guariguata L, Cho NH, et al. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates for the prevalence of diabetes for 2015 and 2040. Diabetes Res Clin Pract [Internet]. 2017;128:40–50.
4. International Institute of Population Sciences. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5) India 2019-21. NFHS-5 report. Mumbai; 2021.
5. Naqvi TZ, Lee MS. Carotid intima-media thickness and plaque in cardiovascular risk assessment. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging [Internet]. 2014;7(10):1025–38.
6. Øygarden H. Carotid Intima-Media Thickness and Prediction of Cardiovascular Disease. Vol. 6, Journal of the American Heart Association. 2017.
7. Greenland P, Alpert JS, Beller GA, Benjamin EJ, Budoff MJ, Fayad ZA, et al. 2010 ACCF/AHA guideline for assessment of cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic adults. J Am Coll Cardiol [Internet]. 2010;56(25).
8. Lorenz MW, Schaefer C, Steinmetz H, Sitzer M. Is Carotid intima media thickness useful for individual prediction of cardiovascular risk? Ten-year results from the Carotid Atherosclerosis Progression Study (CAPS). Eur Heart J [Internet]. 2010;31(16):2041–8.
9. Naqvi TZ, Lee MS. Carotid intima-media thickness and plaque in cardiovascular risk assessment. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging [Internet]. 2014;7(10):1025–38.
10. Øygarden H. Carotid intima-media thickness and prediction of cardiovascular disease. J Am Hear Assoc [Internet]. 2017;6(1):e005313.
11. Frostegård J. Immunity, atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease. BMC Med [Internet]. 2013;11(1):117.
12. Gepner AD, Young R, Delaney JA, Tattersall MC, Blaha MJ, Post WS, et al. Comparison of coronary artery calcium presence, carotid plaque presence, and carotid intima-media thickness for cardiovascular disease prediction in the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging [Internet]. 2014;8(1).
13. Gateva A, Assyov Y, Karamfilova V, Kamenov Z. Common carotid artery intima media thickness (CIMT) in patients with prediabetes and newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Complications. 2024;38(7):108766.
14. Brohall G, Odén A, Fagerberg B. Carotid artery intima-media thickness in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance: A systematic review. Diabet Med [Internet]. 2006;23:609–16.
15. Fusaro MFGS, Zanini JLSS, Silva IN. Increased carotid intima-media thickness in Brazilian adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2016;8(1):74.
16. Gómez-Marcos MA, Recio-Rodríguez JI, Rodríguez-Sánchez E, Patino-Alonso MC, Magallón-Botaya R, Martínez-Vizcaino V, et al. Carotid Intima-Media Thickness in Diabetics and Hypertensive Patients. Rev Española Cardiol (English Ed [Internet]. 2011;64(7):622–5.
17. Zhou YY, Qiu HM, Yang Y, Han YY. Analysis of risk factors for carotid intima-media thickness in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Western China assessed by logistic regression combined with a decision tree model. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2020;12(1).
18. Guo HJ, Li CC, Bian XY, Hao Q. Correlation study on the relationship between dyslipidemia and carotid intima-media thickness in patients with diabetes mellitus. Pakistan J Med Sci [Internet]. 2023;39(3):875–9.
19. Arenillas JF, Molina CA, Chacón P, Rovira A, Montaner J, Coscojuela P, et al. High lipoprotein (a), diabetes, and the extent of symptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis. Neurology [Internet]. 2004;63(1):27–32.
