IMPACT OF CYSTIC DUCT EVALUATION BY MAGNETIC RESONANCE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY BEFORE LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY TO MINIMIZE POST CHOLECYSTECTOMY SYNDROME: A MULTICENTER STUDY

Main Article Content

A S M Shahidul Hossain
Mahmud Hasan Mostofa Kamal
Mohammad Ali Kabir
Zereen Sultana
Lt. Col. Sultana Parvin

Keywords

Biliary anatomy, Cholecystectomy, Cystic duct, Magnetic resonance Cholangiopancreatography, post-cholecystectomy syndrome, Preoperative imaging

Abstract

Background: Post-cholecystectomy syndrome (PCS) encompasses a range of persistent abdominal symptoms following cholecystectomy. Incomplete evaluation of the cystic duct (CD) anatomy is a significant etiological factor.  Objective: To determine the impact of preoperative Magnetic Resonance Cholangiography (MRCP) in delineating CD anatomy on the prevention of post-cholecystectomy syndrome (PCS). Methods: This prospective cross-sectional study was conducted at Ibne Sina Diagnostic & Consultation Center (Uttara), Popular Diagnostic Center (Savar), Super Medical Hospital (Savar) And Enam Medical College Hospital (Savar), Dhaka, from January 2019 to December 2021. A purposive sample of 109 patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy was enrolled. All participants underwent preoperative Magnetic Resonance Cholangiography (MRCP) for precise mapping of cystic duct anatomy. Surgical strategies were subsequently tailored based on the MRCP findings. Patients were prospectively followed for 1 year postoperatively to identify any symptoms of Post-cholecystectomy Syndrome (PCS). Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 23.0, employing descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and regression analysis. Results: Preoperative MRCP identified cystic duct variants in 34.9% of patients. The overall incidence of PCS was 9.2%. A significant association was found between cystic duct variants and PCS development (p=0.003). Surgical adaptation based on MRCP findings resulted in a significantly lower PCS rate (4.3% vs. 12.7%, p=0.012). MRCP demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy (Sensitivity: 96.2%, Specificity: 98.6%) for delineating cystic duct anatomy. Conclusion: Routine preoperative MRCP for cystic duct mapping significantly reduces the incidence of post-cholecystectomy syndrome. It enables proactive surgical planning, leading to more definitive dissection and addressing a key etiology of PCS. Its integration into clinical practice is highly recommended.

Abstract 13 | Pdf Downloads 4

References

[1] Lamberts, M. P., Lugtenberg, M., Rovers, M. M., Roukema, A. J., Drenth, J. P., Westert, G. P., & Van Laarhoven, C. J. (2013). Persistent and de novo symptoms after cholecystectomy: a systematic review of cholecystectomy effectiveness. Surgical endoscopy, 27(3), 709-718.
[2] Vilela, Débora Gomes Junqueira, et al. "Understanding diarrhea in cholecystectomy patients: bibliographical review article." Rev Med (São Paulo) 101.3 (2022): 194771.
[3] Nasir, Ammadudin, et al. "POST CHOLECYSTECTOMY SYNDROME: A TWO-YEAR STUDY." Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal 68.4 (2018).
[4] Mageed, S. A., Omar, M. A., & Redwan, A. A. (2018). Remnant gallbladder and cystic duct stump stone after cholecystectomy: tertiary multicenter experience. Int Surg J, 5(5), 3478-3483.
[5] Arora, Divya, et al. "post-cholecystectomy syndrome: A new look at an old problem." Journal of minimal access surgery 14.3 (2018): 202-207.
[6] Singh, Ashish, et al. "Management of residual gall bladder: a 15-year experience from a north Indian tertiary care center." Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery 22.1 (2018): 36-41.
[7] Saroj, Sanjay Kumar, et al. "The laparoscopic Re-exploration in the management of the gallbladder remnant and the cystic duct stump calculi." Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research: JCDR 10.8 (2016): PC06.
[8] Krishnan, Sandeep, and Douglas Pleskow. "Malignant Obstruction: Biliary Distal." ERCP E-Book (2012): 342.
[9] Rustagi, Tarun, and Priya A. Jamidar. "Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography–related adverse events: general overview." Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics 25.1 (2015): 97-106.
[10] Yoen, Heera, et al. "Comparisons between image quality and diagnostic performance of 2D-and breath-hold 3D magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography at 3T." European Radiology 31.11 (2021): 8399-8407.
[11] Rathore, Manoher Singh, et al. "Comparative study to assess diagnostic reliability of ultrasound and 3T-MRCP in patients of obstructive jaundice." (2015): 919-930.
[12] Kedage, Vijayendra. A Prospective Study to Determine Factors that Predict Difficult Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Patients with Symptomatic Calculous Cholecystitis. MS thesis. Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences (India), 2016.
[13] Hussein, Ahmed Mohamed, Marmar Essam Mahmoud Salama, and Hossam Abd Elkader. "Role of MRCP in the assessment of patients undergoing cholecystectomy." The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine 72.2 (2018): 3879-3885.
[14] Levy, Angela D., Koenraad Mortele, and Benjamin M. Yeh, eds. Gastrointestinal Imaging Cases. OUP USA, 2013.
[15] Pina, Lucas N., et al. "Surgical considerations of the cystic duct and Heister valves." The Surgery Journal 1.01 (2015): e23-e27.
[16] Gupta, Vishal, and Gaurav Jain. "Safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Adoption of universal culture of safety in cholecystectomy." World journal of gastrointestinal surgery 11.2 (2019): 62.
[17] Yıldız, Hülya Kurtul, et al. "Diagnostic contribution of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in biliary obstruction: Additional findings and misdiagnosis." JAREM. Journal of Academic Research in Medicine 7.3 (2017): 135.
[18] Dili, Alexandra, and Claude Bertrand. "Laparoscopic ultrasonography as an alternative to intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy." World journal of gastroenterology 23.29 (2017): 5438.
[19] Girometti, Rossano, et al. "post-cholecystectomy syndrome: spectrum of biliary findings at magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography." The British Journal of Radiology 83.988 (2010): 351-361.
[20] Meier, P. N. "ERCP topics." Endoscopy 32.11 (2000): 863-873.